Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ArcSight Logger based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, and Dynatrace.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
OpenText Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
ArcSight Logger excels in comprehensive log management and integration, appealing to those prioritizing these features. In comparison, Wazuh stands out for its open-source flexibility and scalability, offering valuable adaptability for diverse security needs and a cost-effective pricing strategy.
ArcSight Logger has a substantial initial setup cost, while Wazuh is known for its minimal or nonexistent setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in installation affordability.
ArcSight Logger has a substantial initial setup cost, while Wazuh is known for its minimal or nonexistent setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in installation affordability.
Splunk Enterprise Security is favored for its real-time visibility and flexible analytics, making it suitable for complex environments. In comparison, ArcSight Logger is valued for efficient log management and compliance, offering an easier deployment. Splunk's advanced features justify its cost, whereas ArcSight's economical setup appeals to budget-conscious buyers.
ArcSight Logger is favored for its cost-efficiency and robust log management, especially in scalable and secure environments. In comparison, Dynatrace offers advanced AI monitoring and tech integration, providing expansive features justifying its higher price, appealing to those valuing detailed performance insights.
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
IBM Security QRadar appeals to tech buyers for its competitive pricing, seamless integration, and ease of deployment. In comparison, ArcSight Logger attracts those prioritizing advanced features, expansive data storage, and long-term ROI, despite its higher price and complexity in setup.
IBM Security QRadar is noted for its high setup costs, while ArcSight Logger offers a more budget-friendly setup. QRadar's extensive features may justify the cost for some, contrasting with ArcSight's simpler, cost-effective implementation.
IBM Security QRadar is noted for its high setup costs, while ArcSight Logger offers a more budget-friendly setup. QRadar's extensive features may justify the cost for some, contrasting with ArcSight's simpler, cost-effective implementation.
ArcSight Logger excels in data management and log retrieval, appealing to those needing robust logging features. In comparison, Elastic Security offers real-time threat detection and scalability, drawing interest from those prioritizing flexibility. ArcSight offers straightforward deployment; Elastic provides advanced analytics and long-term value.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
ArcSight Logger offers robust compliance and security features, ideal for enterprises focused on security needs. In comparison, Graylog is favored for its user-friendly interface and configurability, making it appealing to those seeking flexibility and cost-effective log management solutions.
ArcSight Logger offers competitive pricing and excels in log management, while LogRhythm SIEM provides robust threat detection and advanced analytics features. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM offers comprehensive functions, and ArcSight Logger is known for straightforward deployment and reliable customer service.
ArcSight Logger offers robust data ingestion and extensive compliance support, appealing to buyers focused on cost and support. In comparison, Grafana Loki excels with scalability and integration within Grafana, appealing to those seeking dynamic visualizations and alignment with modern cloud environments.
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
ArcSight Logger excels in data integration and search capabilities, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive data handling. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer appeals to users focusing on advanced analytics and reporting, catering to organizations seeking in-depth analysis and adaptable, feature-rich solutions.
ArcSight Logger excels in integration and comprehensive log analysis, appealing to those prioritizing efficient deployment and robust support. In comparison, syslog-ng offers flexibility with advanced filtering and scalability, suiting buyers valuing modular deployment and adaptability for complex environments, despite potential initial costs.
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
ArcSight Logger offers powerful search capabilities ideal for organizations with complex data retention needs. In comparison, Devo delivers superior scalability and real-time analytics, making it attractive for companies seeking advanced features and quicker insights.
ArcSight Logger provides extensive data collection and analytical tools, delivering a robust security solution. In comparison, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers simplicity and ease of use, appealing to users seeking straightforward setup and functionality. ArcSight's comprehensive support contrasts with SolarWinds' budget-friendly pricing and easy deployment.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost than SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, which offers a more budget-friendly option. While ArcSight Logger provides enhanced features, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server balances affordability with essential capabilities.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost than SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, which offers a more budget-friendly option. While ArcSight Logger provides enhanced features, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server balances affordability with essential capabilities.
ArcSight Logger excels in security and compliance, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing robust protection. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers advanced analytics and seamless integration, attracting those needing comprehensive data analysis and visualization. ArcSight Logger is cost-effective; VMware Aria Operations delivers significant ROI.
ArcSight Logger is valued for cost-effectiveness, efficient log management, scalability, and data analysis. In comparison, Check Point Security Management offers comprehensive threat prevention and policy management. ArcSight attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Check Point appeals to those needing advanced security features despite higher costs.
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
ArcSight Logger offers competitive pricing with strong customer support and intuitive operations. In comparison, LogLogic provides advanced features and integration flexibility, appealing to those needing robust analytics despite a steeper learning curve and higher costs.
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is higher upfront, offering robust features, while LogLogic provides a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is higher upfront, offering robust features, while LogLogic provides a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.
