Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ArcSight Logger based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Dynatrace, and Splunk Enterprise Security.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
OpenText Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
ArcSight Logger excels in comprehensive log management and integration, appealing to those prioritizing these features. In comparison, Wazuh stands out for its open-source flexibility and scalability, offering valuable adaptability for diverse security needs and a cost-effective pricing strategy.
ArcSight Logger has a substantial initial setup cost, while Wazuh is known for its minimal or nonexistent setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in installation affordability.
ArcSight Logger has a substantial initial setup cost, while Wazuh is known for its minimal or nonexistent setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in installation affordability.
ArcSight Logger is favored for its cost-efficiency and robust log management, especially in scalable and secure environments. In comparison, Dynatrace offers advanced AI monitoring and tech integration, providing expansive features justifying its higher price, appealing to those valuing detailed performance insights.
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced analytics and versatility for SIEM, appealing to those needing robust data analysis. In comparison, ArcSight Logger focuses on detailed log management, ideal for organizations prioritizing log collection over analytics. Splunk provides deployment flexibility, while ArcSight excels in stable management.
Splunk Enterprise Security generally has higher setup costs compared to ArcSight Logger, offering sophisticated analytics tools and scalability, while ArcSight Logger is noted for its cost-effectiveness with a focus on log management.
Splunk Enterprise Security generally has higher setup costs compared to ArcSight Logger, offering sophisticated analytics tools and scalability, while ArcSight Logger is noted for its cost-effectiveness with a focus on log management.
IBM Security QRadar provides comprehensive features and user-friendly interface for effective security monitoring. In comparison, ArcSight Logger focuses on log management and offers strong integration with ArcSight SIEM, making it suitable for large enterprises requiring robust log management.
IBM Security QRadar generally incurs lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious users, while ArcSight Logger may demand a higher initial investment, potentially offering advanced features as a trade-off.
IBM Security QRadar generally incurs lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious users, while ArcSight Logger may demand a higher initial investment, potentially offering advanced features as a trade-off.
ArcSight Logger excels in data management and log retrieval, appealing to those needing robust logging features. In comparison, Elastic Security offers real-time threat detection and scalability, drawing interest from those prioritizing flexibility. ArcSight offers straightforward deployment; Elastic provides advanced analytics and long-term value.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
ArcSight Logger offers robust compliance and security features, ideal for enterprises focused on security needs. In comparison, Graylog is favored for its user-friendly interface and configurability, making it appealing to those seeking flexibility and cost-effective log management solutions.
ArcSight Logger offers competitive pricing and excels in log management, while LogRhythm SIEM provides robust threat detection and advanced analytics features. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM offers comprehensive functions, and ArcSight Logger is known for straightforward deployment and reliable customer service.
ArcSight Logger offers robust data ingestion and extensive compliance support, appealing to buyers focused on cost and support. In comparison, Grafana Loki excels with scalability and integration within Grafana, appealing to those seeking dynamic visualizations and alignment with modern cloud environments.
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
ArcSight Logger excels in data integration and search capabilities, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive data handling. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer appeals to users focusing on advanced analytics and reporting, catering to organizations seeking in-depth analysis and adaptable, feature-rich solutions.
ArcSight Logger excels in integration and comprehensive log analysis, appealing to those prioritizing efficient deployment and robust support. In comparison, syslog-ng offers flexibility with advanced filtering and scalability, suiting buyers valuing modular deployment and adaptability for complex environments, despite potential initial costs.
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
ArcSight Logger provides extensive data collection and analytical tools, delivering a robust security solution. In comparison, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers simplicity and ease of use, appealing to users seeking straightforward setup and functionality. ArcSight's comprehensive support contrasts with SolarWinds' budget-friendly pricing and easy deployment.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost than SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, which offers a more budget-friendly option. While ArcSight Logger provides enhanced features, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server balances affordability with essential capabilities.
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost than SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, which offers a more budget-friendly option. While ArcSight Logger provides enhanced features, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server balances affordability with essential capabilities.
ArcSight Logger offers powerful search capabilities ideal for organizations with complex data retention needs. In comparison, Devo delivers superior scalability and real-time analytics, making it attractive for companies seeking advanced features and quicker insights.
ArcSight Logger excels in security and compliance, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing robust protection. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers advanced analytics and seamless integration, attracting those needing comprehensive data analysis and visualization. ArcSight Logger is cost-effective; VMware Aria Operations delivers significant ROI.
ArcSight Logger is valued for cost-effectiveness, efficient log management, scalability, and data analysis. In comparison, Check Point Security Management offers comprehensive threat prevention and policy management. ArcSight attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Check Point appeals to those needing advanced security features despite higher costs.
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.