Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Logger vs Graylog comparison

OpenText and Graylog are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #29 with an average rating of 6.9, while Graylog is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.5. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in LM, compared to Graylog’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Graylog users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Logger
Read 31 ArcSight Logger reviews
  • 1,735 Views
  • 1,697 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Graylog
Read 18 Graylog reviews
  • 9,650 Views
  • 8,360 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Graylog are prominent competitors in the log management solutions market. ArcSight Logger tends to have an advantage with its strong security features, while Graylog is noted for its user-friendly architecture and flexibility.

Features: ArcSight Logger stands out for its robust compliance and security features, reliable threat detection, and data integrity. These attributes make it suitable for enterprises facing strict regulatory demands. On the other hand, Graylog is known for its ease of customization, integration capabilities, and user-friendly interface, which appeals to organizations seeking agile, adaptable solutions.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger could improve its integration options, streamline its processes, and enhance its user interface for better adaptability. Graylog needs more comprehensive documentation, improved troubleshooting capabilities, and enhanced user support to streamline operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger is recognized for a structured deployment process but may lack flexibility during implementation. Its customer service is reliable but may not be flexible enough for all users. Graylog offers an easy and simple deployment process, leading to faster setup but needs improvement in response times and detailed customer support.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger's initial setup cost is high, but users justify this with its strong ROI supported by its extensive feature set. Graylog offers a cost-effective solution, being particularly appealing with its open-source option, though users sometimes note a longer timeline for ROI realization as they configure it to their specific requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger
Ranking in Log Management
29th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Graylog
Ranking in Log Management
17th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog is 6.4%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Nagendra Nekkala. - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place
The technical support team is very slow. The support persons do not take prompt action. They take too much time to implement new changes. Even if we tell them that we are not able to get critical logs, they take almost three to four days to provide a resolution. The support is not good.
Read full review
Nicolae CIornii - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable solution with room for improvement in interactivity and user-friendliness
We have tested IBM QRadar and now use it. First of all, the key factor is the pricing. I saw that IBM QRadar has an interactive dashboard, providing valuable insights to people. Additionally, I've seen that IBM QRadar has an agent that simplifies installations across various platforms without requiring intricate configurations. Also, IBM QRadar has automatic reporting.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist."
"It's a robust, mature product and you can do some really complex operations and analytics."
"The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive."
"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."
"Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."
More ArcSight Logger pros
"We're using the Community edition, but I know that it has really good dashboarding and alerts."
"The best feature of Graylog is the Elasticsearch integration. We can integrate and we can run filters, such as an event of interest, and those logs we can send to any SIEM tool or as an analytic. Additionally, there are clear and well-documented implementation instructions on their website to follow if needed."
"Open source and user friendly."
"Message forwarding through the in-built module."
"Allowing us to set up alerts and integrate with platforms we already use, such as Slack and OpsGenie to alert users of these errors proactively, is also a very useful feature."
"Real-time UDP/GELF logging and full text-based searching."
"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."
"The ability to write custom alerts is key to information security and compliance."
More Graylog pros
 

Cons

"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."
"In the next release, I want to see more intelligence."
"It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."
"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"We have had problems with archiving."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
More ArcSight Logger cons
"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."
"Graylog can improve the index rotation as it's quite a complex solution."
"Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest."
"I would like to see a default dashboard widget that shows the topology of the clusters defined for the graylog install."
"I would like to see some kind of visualization included in Graylog."
"It would be great if Graylog could provide a better Python package in order to make it easier to use for the Python community."
"Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt."
"With technical support, you are on your own without an enterprise license."
More Graylog cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."
"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."
"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."
"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."
"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."
"The pricing is quite harsh."
"ArcSight is an expensive solution."
"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."
"It's open source and free. They have a paid version, but we never looked into that because we never needed the features of the paid version."
"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog.​​"
"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."
"I use the free version of Graylog."
"We're using the Community edition."
"Having paid official support is wise for projects."
"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."
More Graylog pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ArcSight Logger?
We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Logger?
The pricing isn't the problem. We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?
The solution has room for improvement. We're currently upgrading to the newer version, where they have something like Kafka, a hub for all solutions feeding information into Logger. However, I thin...
See all answers
What do you like most about Graylog?
The product is scalable. The solution is stable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?
We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Graylog?
Since it's a free tool, I don't have much to say. Troubleshooting is important to me. The initial setup is complex. I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 37% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 32% of the time
Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 13% of the time
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 7% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 3% of the time
More ArcSight Logger Competitors
Grafana Loki vs Graylog Logo
Grafana Loki vs Graylog
Compared 45% of the time
Wazuh vs Graylog Logo
Wazuh vs Graylog
Compared 21% of the time
syslog-ng vs Graylog Logo
syslog-ng vs Graylog
Compared 10% of the time
Security Onion vs Graylog Logo
Security Onion vs Graylog
Compared 4% of the time
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog
Compared 3% of the time
More Graylog Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger
November 2024
ArcSight Logger reportDownload ArcSight Logger product report
Buyer's Guide
Graylog
November 2024
Graylog reportDownload Graylog product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger
Graylog2
 

Learn More

OpenText
Graylog
 

Overview

HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.

Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

  • Considerably faster analysis speeds.
  • More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
  • Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
  • Lower cost than alternatives.
  • Full-scale customer service.
  • No expensive training or tool experts required.
 

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa
Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog
October 2024
Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.