Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Logger vs Graylog comparison

OpenText and Graylog are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #29 with an average rating of 6.9, while Graylog is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.5. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in LM, compared to Graylog’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Graylog users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Logger
Read 31 ArcSight Logger reviews
  • 1,735 Views
  • 1,697 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Graylog
Read 18 Graylog reviews
  • 9,650 Views
  • 8,360 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Graylog are prominent competitors in the log management solutions market. ArcSight Logger tends to have an advantage with its strong security features, while Graylog is noted for its user-friendly architecture and flexibility.

Features: ArcSight Logger stands out for its robust compliance and security features, reliable threat detection, and data integrity. These attributes make it suitable for enterprises facing strict regulatory demands. On the other hand, Graylog is known for its ease of customization, integration capabilities, and user-friendly interface, which appeals to organizations seeking agile, adaptable solutions.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger could improve its integration options, streamline its processes, and enhance its user interface for better adaptability. Graylog needs more comprehensive documentation, improved troubleshooting capabilities, and enhanced user support to streamline operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger is recognized for a structured deployment process but may lack flexibility during implementation. Its customer service is reliable but may not be flexible enough for all users. Graylog offers an easy and simple deployment process, leading to faster setup but needs improvement in response times and detailed customer support.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger's initial setup cost is high, but users justify this with its strong ROI supported by its extensive feature set. Graylog offers a cost-effective solution, being particularly appealing with its open-source option, though users sometimes note a longer timeline for ROI realization as they configure it to their specific requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger
Ranking in Log Management
29th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Graylog
Ranking in Log Management
17th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog is 6.4%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Nagendra Nekkala. - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 1, 2023
A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place
The product helps me see all the event logs in one place. When I look into the application, I can see different levels of alerts and make the required decision The solution provides information about the risk factors. It also provides information on our security exposure. There are multiple…
Read full review
Peter Malaty - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 30, 2022
I can create pipelines, charts, and data maps anyway I like, but the solution needs a better live logging display and improved authentication
Graylog needs to improve their authentication. Their AD integration is really bad. When it comes to ACL's, access control lists, where you want to have different group memberships and control who gets access to what, it really could use major improvements. It seems like a beta authentication version that they came up with in a hurry and said, "Hey guys, we've got something going for you. Use it until we think of something later on." I believe their enterprise version has improved some of these features, but I use the open source version. The second thing would be the way they handle live logging. The fact that Graylog displays logs from the top down is just ridiculous. I've never seen anything that logs this way except for Graylog. I believe this is an issue because they have the selector going in that direction, so it would make sense that they have to implement it that way, but it's definitely not cool. When you're looking at Graylog's live logging, whether it's doing a one-second or five-second pull, you'll notice that new log lines are placed at the top of the screen, not the bottom of the screen. I find this ridiculous because normally when you're looking at logs anywhere, on Linux, even in Windows, you're going to see that the logs are generated at the bottom. That's one thing that Graylog definitely needs to improve. Graylog also needs to invest some time to improve the performance and how they handle the maintenance of Elasticsearch. An added feature I would like to see is the capacity to delegate most of the backend maintenance to the frontend UI. When you have somebody from the service desk working on the solution or somebody who's not a technical person, they could run some of the maintenance stuff directly from the UI. Another thing is something that I saw in LogDNA, where you could have a color based on log regex. For example, it would color the timestamps next to the log lines orange, make the source of the log purple, and then make the actual log content black. That would be very nice to see in Graylog.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."
"It's an efficient solution."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive."
"The technical support team is good...It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console."
"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."
More ArcSight Logger pros
"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."
"Allowing us to set up alerts and integrate with platforms we already use, such as Slack and OpsGenie to alert users of these errors proactively, is also a very useful feature."
"What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc."
"The ability to write custom alerts is key to information security and compliance."
"Open source and user friendly."
"Graylog's search functionality, alerting functionality, user management, and dashboards are useful."
"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is."
"We run a containerized microservices environment. Being able to set up streams and search for errors and anomalies across hundreds of containers is why a log aggregation platform like Graylog is valuable to us."
More Graylog pros
 

Cons

"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."
"In the next release, I want to see more intelligence."
"It would be better if the product is cheaper."
"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"We have had problems with archiving."
"It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
More ArcSight Logger cons
"I would like to see a date and time in the Graylog Grok patterns so that I can save time when searching for a log. I like how the streams and the search query work, but adding a date and time will allow me to pull out a log in a milli-second."
"It would be great if Graylog could provide a better Python package in order to make it easier to use for the Python community."
"Graylog needs to improve their authentication. Also, the fact that Graylog displays logs from the top down is just ridiculous."
"Lacks sufficient documentation."
"There should be some user groups and an auto sign-in feature.​"
"I would like to see a default dashboard widget that shows the topology of the clusters defined for the graylog install."
"Elasticsearch recommendations for tuning could be better. Graylog doesn't have direct support for running the system inside of Kubernetes, so it can be challenging to fill in the gaps and set up containers in a way that is both performant and stable."
"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."
More Graylog cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite harsh."
"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."
"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."
"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."
"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."
"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."
"ArcSight is an expensive solution."
"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."
"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
"I use the free version of Graylog."
"It's open source and free. They have a paid version, but we never looked into that because we never needed the features of the paid version."
"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."
"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog.​​"
"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements.​"
"We're using the Community edition."
"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."
More Graylog pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ArcSight Logger?
We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Logger?
The pricing isn't the problem. We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?
The solution has room for improvement. We're currently upgrading to the newer version, where they have something like Kafka, a hub for all solutions feeding information into Logger. However, I thin...
See all answers
What do you like most about Graylog?
The product is scalable. The solution is stable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?
We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Graylog?
Since it's a free tool, I don't have much to say. Troubleshooting is important to me. The initial setup is complex. I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 37% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 33% of the time
Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 13% of the time
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 8% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 3% of the time
More ArcSight Logger Competitors
Grafana Loki vs Graylog Logo
Grafana Loki vs Graylog
Compared 45% of the time
Wazuh vs Graylog Logo
Wazuh vs Graylog
Compared 20% of the time
syslog-ng vs Graylog Logo
syslog-ng vs Graylog
Compared 10% of the time
Security Onion vs Graylog Logo
Security Onion vs Graylog
Compared 4% of the time
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog
Compared 3% of the time
More Graylog Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger
November 2024
ArcSight Logger reportDownload ArcSight Logger product report
Buyer's Guide
Graylog
October 2024
Graylog reportDownload Graylog product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger
Graylog2
 

Learn More

OpenText
Graylog
 

Overview

HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.

Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

  • Considerably faster analysis speeds.
  • More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
  • Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
  • Lower cost than alternatives.
  • Full-scale customer service.
  • No expensive training or tool experts required.
 

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa
Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog
October 2024
Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.