Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Logger vs Wazuh comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wazuh's customer service is highly rated, with excellent paid support and active community forums for troubleshooting assistance.
We use the open-source version of Wazuh, which does not provide paid support.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.1
Wazuh's interface is complex, lacking integration, scalability, AI capabilities, and requires better support, efficiency, and automated features.
The integration modules are insufficiently developed, necessitating the creation of custom integration solutions using tools like Logstash and PubSub.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Wazuh's scalability is mixed, requiring technical expertise, with feedback ranging from four to ten, noting resource challenges.
Scalability depends on the configuration and the infrastructure resources like compute and memory we allocate.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wazuh is cost-effective but includes support and infrastructure expenses, appealing to smaller organizations despite scalability limitations.
Totaling around two lakh Indian rupees per month.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Wazuh is generally stable with minor glitches, suitable for small to mid-level businesses, often affected by configuration issues.
The stability of Wazuh is strong, with no issues stemming from the solution itself.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Wazuh provides cost-effective, open-source security with integration, compliance, monitoring, and vulnerability assessment for diverse systems and platforms.
We found the MITRE framework mapping and the agent enrollment service to be the most valuable features of Wazuh.
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger
Ranking in Log Management
29th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Wazuh
Ranking in Log Management
2nd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 17.1%, up from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Nagendra Nekkala. - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place
The technical support team is very slow. The support persons do not take prompt action. They take too much time to implement new changes. Even if we tell them that we are not able to get critical logs, they take almost three to four days to provide a resolution. The support is not good.
Vikrant Puranik - PeerSpot reviewer
It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services
I worked with Splunk, Curator, ArcSight, and some legacy solutions that no longer exist. They became obsolete or transitioned to a different product. Cost-effectiveness was one reason we switched. We had to decide whether to spend $500,000 on a commercial product or rely on our skills to deploy an open-source solution. The big difference between Wazuh and other solutions is maturity and customization. Wazuh's scalability and out-of-the-box functionality are slightly lagging behind, but Wazuh has improved a lot since the first time we saw it. Others have more search capabilities, whereas Wazuh depends on Elasticsearch. Searching is a bit slower in Wazuh.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
University
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ArcSight Logger?
We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Logger?
The pricing isn't the problem. We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee.
What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?
The solution has room for improvement. We're currently upgrading to the newer version, where they have something like Kafka, a hub for all solutions feeding information into Logger. However, I thin...
What do you like most about Wazuh?
Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.
What needs improvement with Wazuh?
The latest version, 4.9, has improved the interface significantly. I am yet to explore more about the update to identify further areas for improvement. So far, the recent updates have addressed mos...
What is your primary use case for Wazuh?
We use Wazuh for our Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) needs. It serves as a log aggregator and provides us the capability to monitor our servers for brute force attacks and other se...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.