Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Cybereason Managed Detection & Response comparison

"The product provides integrations with several different SaaS applications."

"Having quarterly meetings with the team to review the last 90 days and determine what if any changes need to be made."

"Arctic Wolf is our eyes and ears 24/7 because we can't possibly watch all of our alerts. We may see all of these alerts, but our attention is distracted because we're working on other things."

"The tool definitely saves money for our company's customers."

"This service makes answering audits much easier since it covers so many security best practices."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its ease of implementation."

"Security protection is the best feature of this product."

"The integration between Cisco AMPs and the Windows servers is most valuable. So, they can also sandbox machines on which they see something suspicious."

"The quick reaction and the ability to restore the state before within a short time are significant."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is endpoint management...The solution's support team is quite good at giving us feedback if there is an issue."

"The quick reaction and the ability to restore the state before within a short time are significant."

"Automated information on zero-day threats is provided without us needing to ask."

"They focus on detecting administrator-level control compromises. Because they're focusing more on administrator-level compromise, they are less able to see if an individual user has been compromised. It is, admittedly, very difficult because they don't know what normal human behavior is. If a hacker compromises a human account and then acts just like the human, how are you ever going to notice, unless you have some inside knowledge of how the company works? For example, they overlook account lockouts on user accounts, whereas in our own alerting system, we do not. We review every account lockout, and if it is bad, we contact the person, whereas they think of that as noise because they're more focused on the administrator-level compromise."

"In the future, I would like to see a summary report."

"I have heard that the tool doesn't go right to the endpoints."

"While they do inventory assets, including software inventory and CVE updates based on software subscriptions, would be a major improvement."

"We get a lot of false alarms, but that's because they don't know our network in detail. I think that could be alleviated if we told them more about our network so they could create rules to skip some of those things."

"More integrations with various security tools to improve data ingestion would be beneficial."

"While they do inventory assets, including software inventory and CVE updates based on software subscriptions, would be a major improvement."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response's analysis and remediation parts could be improved. It's not bad, but it needs improvement."

"If the language barrier was addressed, it would lower the barrier for a number of German customers."

"The interface, particularly the dashboard we use for looking at alerts, could be improved."

"If the language barrier was addressed, it would lower the barrier for a number of German customers. It would take away a unique selling point for our own specialist managed service."

"For every new client or every new case, my company has to spin up a new instance, because of which there is a new URL."

"I find their pricing to be reasonable and competitive."

"It is more expensive than CrowdStrike, but it also has more features. I don't remember the amount, but I do remember that it was on the higher side. I believe we have five sensors, and the sensors have a yearly cost. We don't have any additional costs, but I know that if we have more features, they will add to the cost."

"The pricing is pretty competitive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The pricing is fair."

"Price-wise, Cybereason Managed Detection & Response is effective for larger companies, but if you have a small company with less than 1,000 employees, then it gets expensive."