Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting comparison

"The tool definitely saves money for our company's customers."

"Having quarterly meetings with the team to review the last 90 days and determine what if any changes need to be made."

"The visibility into our endpoints is huge."

"The agents give pretty good visibility into what is happening at the endpoint."

"They have a portal where you can evaluate and mitigate any vulnerabilities that you and your network might have."

"I highly recommend Arctic Wolf as they excel in ensuring the company is well-trained and updated on industry developments."

"I rate the overall solution nine out of ten."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the managed detection and response component."

"The solution helps to detect some suspicious items for us and our clients."

"More integrations with various security tools to improve data ingestion would be beneficial."

"They could probably expand on their integration tools. They can integrate with more security tools."

"While they do inventory assets, including software inventory and CVE updates based on software subscriptions, would be a major improvement."

"In the future, I would like to see a summary report."

"I would like to see them build the ability to co-sell an EDR platform, manage an EDR or manage the actual response, potentially from the issues that are coming up from the security risks."

"I can't think of any specific features that they need to add at the moment. As long as they continue to develop new solutions to support different operating systems and technologies, we are satisfied with their service. We appreciate the effort they put into adding new features and functionality to their service and believe they are doing a great job in providing us with all the necessary tools and resources to stay secure."

"I would actually be interested in having fewer features at a lower price."

"They focus on detecting administrator-level control compromises. Because they're focusing more on administrator-level compromise, they are less able to see if an individual user has been compromised. It is, admittedly, very difficult because they don't know what normal human behavior is. If a hacker compromises a human account and then acts just like the human, how are you ever going to notice, unless you have some inside knowledge of how the company works? For example, they overlook account lockouts on user accounts, whereas in our own alerting system, we do not. We review every account lockout, and if it is bad, we contact the person, whereas they think of that as noise because they're more focused on the administrator-level compromise."

"The solution’s user interface could be improved."

"The pricing is fair."

"I find their pricing to be reasonable and competitive."

"The pricing is pretty competitive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"It is more expensive than CrowdStrike, but it also has more features. I don't remember the amount, but I do remember that it was on the higher side. I believe we have five sensors, and the sensors have a yearly cost. We don't have any additional costs, but I know that if we have more features, they will add to the cost."