Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] comparison

HPE Aruba Networking and Citrix are both solutions in the WAN Optimization category. Additionally, 100% of HPE Aruba Networking users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Citrix users who would recommend it.
Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Pl...
Read 20 Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform reviews
  • 632 Views
  • 448 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 22, 2024

    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform and Citrix SD-WAN compete in the SD-WAN performance and features category. Users generally prefer Aruba for its support and pricing, while Citrix stands out for its specific features.

    Features: Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is praised for its comprehensive security, application performance capabilities, and reliable connectivity. Citrix SD-WAN is noted for its integration ease with virtual environments, robust traffic handling, and advanced configuration options.

    Room for Improvement: Users of Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform suggest analytics and reporting enhancements, improvement in scalability, and better hardware integration. Citrix SD-WAN users recommend improvement in stability, user interface upgrades, and more comprehensive documentation.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform users find deployment straightforward with responsive support. Citrix SD-WAN users experience more complexity in deployment but also commend the support provided.

    Pricing and ROI: Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform users find setup cost reasonable with favorable ROI. Citrix SD-WAN users comment on higher setup costs but acknowledge substantial long-term benefits and ROI.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: September 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    September 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 813,418 peers since 2012
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Pl...
    Average Rating
    8.8
    Number of Reviews
    20
    Ranking in other categories
    WAN Optimization (2nd), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (7th), WAN Edge (7th)
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Raja Waqar Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
    Oct 30, 2023
    User-friendly and offers valuable feature for tracking traffic flow, providing insights into latency and exact paths from source to destination
    In future releases, I would like to see security features, so Aruba might need some firewalls, like other vendors. For example, Fortinet gives the same feature, but it's gives the feature, that we can use the firewall as well. But, inside the Aruba, I didn't see this feature, secure device, I didn't see the feature. Although it's secure, we established a secure tunnel between all the branches, but still, Aruba might need some security features to be enhanced inside this product. It might be that Aruba doesn't need that one. But the vendor, if they are giving some extra security feature availability, they also give that feature.
    Read full review
    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jul 4, 2023
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "I had to deal with them on a couple of issues, but the tool's technical support is top-notch...The product's initial setup phase is straightforward and the easiest."
    "The most valuable feature of Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect is the boost."
    "The tool's most valuable feature is bandwidth optimization."
    "The most valuable feature is the support for asymmetric lines."
    "I really love the auto-tunnel creation feature."
    "The most valuable features of Silver Peak VX is the flexibility, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, the long-distance performance of the application storage is easy and effective."
    "The platform is valuable for bandwidth reduction."
    "Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect has high availability."
    More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform pros
    "The tool is quite cost-effective because it replaces the need for MPLS, which is a bit expensive...Citrix SD-WAN doesn't need much maintenance."
    "The zero-touch deployment is most valuable for us."
    "The most valuable feature is security, as it gives me the port bindings that cannot be accomplished using other solutions."
    "The SD-WAN solution as it is already is quite feature-rich and the upgrade process is very simple."
    "The main advantage of Citrix SD-WAN is that it enables fast communication between our branches and data centers. And, with its cloud management features, it also makes the process of adding new branches into our company network much easier."
    "The scalability and stability are quite good in general."
    "We are using it widely for the local record for SaaS-based applications. Another valuable feature is a local breakout."
    "The most valuable feature of Citrix SD-WAN is customization. You are able to customize the solution to your needs."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "I guess the tool should give you a little more flexibility on what you can show on the main window, which can be an area of improvement."
    "This solution is suitable for small to medium-sized companies. If we have large-sized companies it is better to use Cisco or Palo Alto."
    "If compared with Cisco, then Aruba's pricing is very aggressive."
    "Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform’s stability and technical features need improvement."
    "They have to implement more security with it. The security, mainly their firewall functions, have to be included in the firewall features."
    "I expect automation in the Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform's next release."
    "There are some functional limitations that could improve."
    "The support from Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect has declined since Aruba acquired them. The knowledge and speed of the agents could improve."
    More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform cons
    "The reports need to be improved. We need to have them customized but they don't have that right now. I would like for them to have better system predictions. We don't have that right now. My system may be working fine right now but after making some changes, that can change."
    "I would like to see support for additional reporting."
    "Citrix SD-WAN does not have the SD-WAN with one optimization in a single license. Other competitors have this option and it should be added to this solution."
    "Given that Citrix SD-WAN solved all our problems by providing us with everything we needed to unify communications with our branches and data centers, I cannot suggest anything further in terms of improvements."
    "Citrix SD-WAN's knowledge base has a few missing things, so you may need to seek help from support."
    "Even though the monitoring is pretty good, there is some room for improvement there."
    "Overall, network security and next-generation firewall features are areas that they can improve on."
    "The price could be improved, it's an expensive solution."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The price of Silver Peak VX is reasonable but could improve."
    "The licensing fees depend on the bandwidth. As an example of what we charge our customers, for 100MB without Boost, the price is approximately $2,000. That includes the licensing and the unit."
    "There is an annual license required to use Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect."
    "The license for Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect is paid annually."
    "On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, I rate the pricing around five to six."
    "The license could improve for Silver Peak VX."
    "You typically will license the hardware and you license the software to access the hardware capabilities. The price will range anywhere from a hundred to $300 a month. There are no additional costs."
    "The pricing for this product is good."
    More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform pricing and cost advice
    "Citrix SD-WAN is quite an affordable product."
    "The price is relatively expensive."
    "It is a bit expensive. A cheaper product would be good, but everybody likes things to be cheaper. We bought the devices up front, and then we pay for the annual support."
    "The license was a one-time purchase. It's expensive."
    "As NetScaler is now, I find it quite pricey."
    "It depends on the scale. In our case, it would have been better if we had known about the life cycling steps, but otherwise, it is worth the money."
    "I'm not quite sure of the price ranges. Roughly, the hidden devices can scale up to $20K for one appliance. However, the branch CPs are USD $1,000 to $2,500."
    "It's a little bit on the high side compared to the other products."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    14%
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Manufacturing Company
    10%
    University
    5%
    Computer Software Company
    21%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    7%
    Retailer
    7%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Silver Peak NX?
    The tool's most valuable feature is bandwidth optimization.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silver Peak NX?
    Compared to other solutions, I think it is a cheap product in the market. I think the pricing is good. I wish we had more sites. We have 30 locations domestically. I really wish we had more so we c...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Silver Peak NX?
    I haven't had a problem using the product since day one. As a matter of fact, I got it up and running by just reading the quick start guide and deploying it. It is really easy to deploy. I guess th...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiGate vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform
    Compared 26% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform
    Compared 19% of the time
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Logo
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform
    Compared 14% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform
    Compared 11% of the time
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Logo
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Competitors
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 31% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform
    October 2024
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform reportDownload Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    October 2024
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Silver Peak NX, Silver Peak VX, Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect
    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
     

    Learn More

    HPE Aruba Networking
    Citrix
     

    Overview

    The EdgeConnect SD-WAN platform secures and powers a self-driving wide area network for cloud-first enterprises.

    In today’s edge-to-cloud enterprise, user experience and security are not optional

    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN provides a secure network foundation for Zero Trust and SASE. It includes a first-class SD-WAN paired with a next-generation firewall delivering unmatched quality of experience and advanced security.

    Best-of-breed SASE with no compromise

    EdgeConnect SD-WAN enables a best-of-breed SASE architecture that meets the security requirements of today’s digital organizations. It provides comprehensive SD-WAN and security services including next-generation firewall, fine-grained segmentation, IDS/IPS, and tightly integrates with many SSE (Security Service Edge) solutions.

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

     

    Sample Customers

    Group Dekko, Kingston Technology, American Student Assistance, Ares Management, Charlotte Metro Credit Union, Colonial Savings, Community Bank, Denali Credit Union, Bed Bath & Beyond, Breweries of Cameroon, Carnival Australia, Coastal Beverages, Toshiba Electronics, Tru Blu Beverages, WAXIE Sanitary Supply, Charleston Area Medical Center, Community Health Plan, Healthcare Company, Mercy Health, Linklaters, Miles & Stockbridge, Thomson Snell & Passmore
    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    September 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: September 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors, best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors, and best WAN Edge vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.