Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo

Top 10 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: Citrix
4.1 out of 5
430 followers
Post review

Top Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, and Steelhead. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering superior application performance, seamless failover, and enhanced network visibility, ensuring reliable and optimized connectivity for enterprises.

Citrix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Citrix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
4.4 out of 5
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers reliable connections and ease of integration. In comparison, Cato SASE Cloud Platform provides comprehensive security and robust traffic management. Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] excels in cost-effectiveness, while Cato SASE Cloud Platform is valued for advanced features, higher ROI, and smooth deployment.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to the more affordable Cato SASE Cloud Platform. The significant cost difference highlights varied budget needs for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to the more affordable Cato SASE Cloud Platform. The significant cost difference highlights varied budget needs for initial implementation.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform
4.4 out of 5
Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform excels in reliability and support quality, offering advanced routing, strong security, and comprehensive analytics. In comparison, Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is noted for ease of integration and specific performance features, with application-level controls and seamless integration with other Citrix products.
Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform has a moderate setup cost emphasized by its comprehensive documentation, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is reported to have a high initial setup cost with limited support.
View comparison
Pricing
Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform has a moderate setup cost emphasized by its comprehensive documentation, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is reported to have a high initial setup cost with limited support.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Steelhead
4.1 out of 5
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Steelhead
4.1 out of 5
Steelhead shines with effective WAN optimization and reliability, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is known for flexibility and advanced security. In comparison, Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] requires better documentation and user-friendly configurations, but it maintains commendable customer service and competitive pricing. Steelhead users appreciate straightforward deployment and robust performance.
Steelhead users report high setup costs, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is noted for a more budget-friendly initial setup. Steelhead's pricing impacts smaller businesses more than Citrix SD-WAN, which aligns better with cost-sensitive projects.
View comparison
Pricing
Steelhead users report high setup costs, while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is noted for a more budget-friendly initial setup. Steelhead's pricing impacts smaller businesses more than Citrix SD-WAN, which aligns better with cost-sensitive projects.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Exinda
4.4 out of 5
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Exinda
4.4 out of 5
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers reliable performance and ease of management. In comparison, Exinda excels with comprehensive analytics and exceptional network optimization capabilities. Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] provides simpler deployment, but Exinda's complex setup is offset by better long-term ROI and superior customer service.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a high setup cost, whereas Exinda is known for its relatively low setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a high setup cost, whereas Exinda is known for its relatively low setup cost.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
WAAS
1 out of 5
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
WAAS
1 out of 5
WAAS is noted for its data compression and application acceleration. Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is recognized for its dynamic path selection and enhanced security features. In comparison, WAAS offers streamlined deployment while Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] provides better customer service. WAAS is cost-effective; Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers long-term benefits.
WAAS has an extensive setup cost compared to Citrix SD-WAN, which is known for its more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WAAS has an extensive setup cost compared to Citrix SD-WAN, which is known for its more economical initial investment.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
FatPipe WAN Optimization
1 out of 5
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers seamless integration and high reliability, suited for straightforward deployments. In comparison, FatPipe WAN Optimization excels with its advanced traffic handling and robust failover capabilities, appealing to buyers seeking comprehensive features and long-term cost savings despite higher initial costs.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a relatively higher setup cost, while FatPipe WAN Optimization offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] has a relatively higher setup cost, while FatPipe WAN Optimization offers a more cost-effective setup option.

Related categories

WAN Optimization
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
WAN Edge