Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] comparison

Cisco and Citrix are both solutions in the Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions category. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Citrix users who would recommend it.
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
Read 92 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN reviews
  • 11,860 Views
  • 7,585 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 29, 2024

    Citrix SD-WAN and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN compete in the software-defined networking market. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN generally seems to have the upper hand in terms of comprehensive security features and scalability.

    Features: Citrix SD-WAN offers HDX WAN Optimization, application acceleration, and robust load balancing. It also provides reliable connectivity and cloud management. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is known for its extensive application routing, centralized management tools, and strong security capabilities.

    Room for Improvement: Citrix SD-WAN users report high costs and a complex licensing model, along with a need for enhanced security and better reporting/documentation. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is criticized for its high costs and complicated licensing. Users seek improved security integration, better integration capabilities, and a simpler management interface.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix SD-WAN supports on-premises setups with cloud management, although customer service quality varies. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN offers support for hybrid and cloud deployment environments, providing simplified deployment for complex infrastructures. Generally reliable technical support is noted, but both products could improve first-line support and deployment processes.

    Pricing and ROI: Citrix SD-WAN is pricey but offers flexible licensing models with a potential for long-term savings. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is also perceived as expensive, with a complex subscription-based pricing structure. While both are considered good investments for their feature sets, there's room for cost optimization to attract budget-conscious organizations.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Report (Updated: January 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    January 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.0
    Number of Reviews
    92
    Ranking in other categories
    Network Management Applications (5th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (2nd), WAN Edge (2nd)
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.4
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Q&A Highlights

    OT
    May 08, 2020
    What is the biggest difference between Cisco SD-WAN and Citrix SD-WAN?
    Cisco is a traditional networking play and has successfully transformed from pure hardware to now software defined products. Many network engineers already use the product and makes a lot of sense for a company with Cisco history to go towards Cisco just like a company which uses citrix desktops will go for the Citrix ADC. Therefore, configuration of Cisco, while not being difficult, is more "formatted" for Engineers who have used the solution and already have deep understanding of the protocols As a relatively new comer, Citrix seems to have put more effort to make the implementation process easier in terms of GUI Now, citrix has one fourth the market share of cisco and this is crucial in terms of competency - as it is 4 times easier to get Cisco competency However, in terms of costs, I like Citrix Netscaler pooled licensing arrangement, It is a flexible licensing framework whereby there is a common pool of license regardless whether the customer performs the deployment as a physical hardware, virtual device or even a containerized solution already use the product. Therefore, Cisco has higher costs As for used cases, I have seen NetScalers used for Load Balancing, for external users to internal services and resources like XenDesktop and XenApp Finally, both Cisco and Citrix have resilient solutions and provide good support - also some dependency where you are located. As for recommendation, it depends on your specific scenario in light of above points.
    See all answers
     

    Featured Reviews

    Igor Van Den Ouden - PeerSpot reviewer
    Enables secure and flexible branch connectivity with application-aware routing
    The valuable features of Cisco SD-WAN include its security policies and zone-based firewall that are applied to every site, as well as application-aware routing. Security is standard compliant, eliminating config drift that was prevalent before manual configurations. Application-aware routing offers flexibility in using different lines for traffic, depending on the policy implemented.
    Read full review
    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The technical support is very responsive."
    "It is a very scalable solution."
    "When we have had power outages for a few hours we have had no issue with Cisco SD-WAN coming back online and functioning."
    "Cisco SD-WAN is a good product."
    "Cisco SD-WAN's best features are the development of network links, application control, and bandwidth monitoring."
    "The most valuable feature is the ease of central management."
    "Using SD-WAN to combine services can result in better up time, higher speeds, and much lower costs."
    "The most valuable features of Cisco SD-WAN include the DIA and its integration with Cisco Umbrella for DNS security."
    More Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN pros
    "The best feature is the backup capability, where all of the users' computers are tied into a central data repository."
    "The stability is the main feature of Citrix SD-WAN. You can also upgrade the data packages or have less transmission."
    "It allows us to use additional VPNs, offering more options compared to other VPN solutions."
    "The most valuable feature is security, as it gives me the port bindings that cannot be accomplished using other solutions."
    "The VPN and the load balancing are the most valuable features."
    "The reliability of connectivity is most valuable."
    "It allows you to combine two asymmetrical connections."
    "The tool is quite cost-effective because it replaces the need for MPLS, which is a bit expensive...Citrix SD-WAN doesn't need much maintenance."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "There should be more security features in the hybrid and on-premise deployments of Cisco SD-WAN. The cloud has most of the security features."
    "All of the configurations are based on templates, and we need to spend a lot of time doing the templates. It's good because that means that all of the configurations will be equal in the network. However, we need to spend a lot of time implementing the templates and doing the customizations."
    "I would like to see revision cycles to be more stable."
    "The price could be better. From a technical side, and everything's working smoothly. Cisco SD-WAN could be cheaper."
    "Cisco SD-WAN is not as easy to deploy as the Meraki and FortiGate solutions. The zero-touch deployment could be a lot better. The deployment and initial setup are complicated and could be better."
    "This solution should include a fully functional firewall at no extra charge."
    "They should enhance the reporting because, as it is today, they need more executive-level reports."
    "It's an expensive solution."
    More Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN cons
    "The price could be improved, it's an expensive solution."
    "The initial setup could be a bit easier."
    "Citrix SD-WAN's knowledge base has a few missing things, so you may need to seek help from support."
    "The price is the only thing that could be improved. Citrix is not a cheap solution."
    "Enhancements are needed to improve the stability."
    "I would like to see support for additional reporting."
    "The only improvement for Citrix SD-WAN would be to lower its cost."
    "Citrix SD-WAN does not have the SD-WAN with one optimization in a single license. Other competitors have this option and it should be added to this solution."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "There is no license required for this solution."
    "It is going to be on a yearly basis. There are no additional costs."
    "The license model is too complex with too many flavors and options. You might not be able to see it from an end user's point of view, but from a telco point of view, their license model is too complex. They should have a flexible license model. If you want to have good pricing, you need to buy it for a two-year, four-year, or five-year license immediately. Some other vendors have much more flexible license models."
    "The price of the solution is the only negative factor, it is much more expensive compared with the Cisco Meraki SD-WAN solution."
    "You have to pay between 3000 and 10,000 euros, or something in that range. The core switches Nexus cost me between 10,000 and 20,000 euros."
    "On a scale of one to five, I would rate Cisco's pricing as a three."
    "It's costly. The cost is high compared to competitors."
    "It is expensive. The license limitation is there in terms of bandwidth. Basically, Cisco is always good in terms of performance and related things. However, if you want to have a license, for example, for 100 Mbps, they charge you because of their 100 Mbps. If you want to go without the license of 300 Mbps, it is a bandwidth license as well. This is not happening with other vendors. That is the reason why we moved away from Cisco. The bill gets a little bit high. I do remember that one time we were trying to increase the bandwidth for at least five devices, and the license got as high as 20-grand for five devices, only for the license. It was expensive for us at the time. Our company is not a big company, but it is a solid company. The price was very high, and we moved away from Cisco because of the price."
    More Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN pricing and cost advice
    "As NetScaler is now, I find it quite pricey."
    "Citrix SD-WAN is quite an affordable product."
    "It would be helpful to have a demo license available for customers who want to prove the concept and conduct a proof of concept (POC) before committing to the solution. This is particularly important for customers in Egypt who often require a demonstration of the solution's features and compatibility with their needs before making any investment or incurring costs. Providing a demo license would allow customers to assess whether the solution would meet their needs or not."
    "The price is relatively expensive."
    "I'm not quite sure of the price ranges. Roughly, the hidden devices can scale up to $20K for one appliance. However, the branch CPs are USD $1,000 to $2,500."
    "It is a bit expensive. A cheaper product would be good, but everybody likes things to be cheaper. We bought the devices up front, and then we pay for the annual support."
    "It's a little bit on the high side compared to the other products."
    "It depends on the scale. In our case, it would have been better if we had known about the life cycling steps, but otherwise, it is worth the money."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Educational Organization
    45%
    Computer Software Company
    13%
    Financial Services Firm
    6%
    Manufacturing Company
    4%
    Computer Software Company
    24%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    8%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Manufacturing Company
    6%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Cisco SD-WAN?
    When considering the most valuable features of Cisco SD-WAN, the decoupling of self-monitoring stands out significantly.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco SD-WAN?
    The pricing for Cisco SD-WAN is rated eight out of ten, with some variability depending on the reseller discounts and the size of the enterprise. It is also relatively cost-effective for smaller bu...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Cisco SD-WAN?
    The main area for improvement in Cisco SD-WAN is the lack of documentation, which often lags behind the software releases. This is especially notable since Cisco acquired the solution and is still ...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Compared 15% of the time
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Logo
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Compared 12% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Compared 12% of the time
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Logo
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Compared 9% of the time
    Peplink SpeedFusion vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Logo
    Peplink SpeedFusion vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Compared 7% of the time
    More Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Competitors
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 33% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 16% of the time
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    January 2025
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN reportDownload Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    January 2025
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Cisco SD-WAN
    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
     

    Learn More

    Cisco
    Citrix
     

    Overview

    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN serves to connect remote offices, reduce MPLS costs, and facilitate cloud and internet access while providing secure connectivity and centralized management for hybrid networks.

    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is leveraged for secure connectivity, load balancing, VPN, centralized network management, and migrating from traditional networks to SD-WAN. It supports hybrid networks, enabling centralized management across branches and data centers, improving security, and optimizing bandwidth usage. Industries such as banking and retail benefit from its capabilities for secure and efficient network management.

    What are the main features of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN?
    • Centralized Management: Simplifies network operations and administration.
    • Application-Level Routing: Enhances performance for critical applications.
    • Segmentation: Provides robust network segmentation for security.
    • Policy Configuration: Customizable policies for traffic management.
    • Real-Time Traffic Visibility: Enables monitoring for better insights.
    • Load Balancing: Distributes network traffic efficiently.
    • Hybrid Cloud Connectivity: Seamless integration with cloud services.
    • Deep Packet Inspection: Detailed traffic analysis for security.
    • High Security: Offers strong security protocols to protect the network.
    • Ease of Deployment: Features like zero-touch provisioning simplify setup.
    What benefits should be considered in reviews?
    • Cost Savings: Reduces operational expenses through efficient network management.
    • Reliability: Proven performance and uptime for critical operations.
    • Scalability: Grows with the organization's needs.
    • Integrated Health Monitoring: Proactively identifies and resolves issues.
    • Industry Trust: Cisco's reputation for quality and support.

    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN's implementation in banking enhances secure transaction communication between branches and data centers. Retailers utilize it to ensure steady connectivity for point-of-sale systems and inventory management. Organizations benefit from centralized management, making it easier to handle networks across multiple locations.

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

     

    Sample Customers

    Doyle Research, Ashton Metzler & Associates
    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    January 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions. Updated: January 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.