Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform comparison

Citrix and Versa Networks are both solutions in the Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions category. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Versa Networks users who would recommend it.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    Versa Unified Secure Access...
    Read 21 Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform reviews
    • 2,891 Views
    • 2,173 Comparison Views
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 22, 2024

    Citrix SD-WAN EOL and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge compete in the advanced capabilities and integration of security features category. Versa has the upper hand due to its extensive security capabilities and modern architecture.

    Features: Citrix SD-WAN EOL users note robust traffic control, reliability, and ease of integration with legacy systems. Versa SASE users highlight its security capabilities, zero-trust framework, and seamless cloud integration. Versa’s superior security features and modern architecture stand out in today's environments.

    Room for Improvement: Citrix SD-WAN EOL needs enhancements in scalability, better analytics, and improved user interface. Versa SASE requires better documentation, more responsive tech support, and streamlined onboarding processes.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix SD-WAN EOL is easy to deploy and provides reliable customer service. Versa SASE is also easy to deploy but receives mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness. Both have easy deployment, but Citrix leads slightly in customer service.

    Pricing and ROI: Citrix SD-WAN EOL is cost-effective with solid ROI. Versa SASE has higher initial costs but delivers substantial long-term ROI with its comprehensive features and versatile deployment models. Versa's higher upfront investment is justified by strong ongoing returns.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Report (Updated: September 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    September 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 813,418 peers since 2012
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Versa Unified Secure Access...
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Number of Reviews
    21
    Ranking in other categories
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (9th), WAN Edge (10th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (14th)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jul 4, 2023
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review
    PranavGupta - PeerSpot reviewer
    Nov 3, 2023
    A cloud-managed, cloud-delivered private access service efficiently connecting distributed users with. distributed applications without compromising on security or user experience.
    Certainly, there are areas that require enhancement, and the current focus is on improvements. Presently, I believe that the emphasis should be on enhancing user interface (UI) features, particularly over end devices. The issue arises when attempting to log in to Versa from other devices, as the UI is not device-specific. Consequently, guiding someone to log in to Versa antivirus becomes challenging. Despite the absence of issues on the website, the lack of a login scope impedes graphical representation of user data or databases. Since work databases support only a limited range of features, I recommend augmenting features for end devices to address these limitations.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The VPN and the load balancing are the most valuable features."
    "The tool is quite cost-effective because it replaces the need for MPLS, which is a bit expensive...Citrix SD-WAN doesn't need much maintenance."
    "The most valuable feature of Citrix SD-WAN is customization. You are able to customize the solution to your needs."
    "The most valuable feature is its reliability."
    "The best feature is the backup capability, where all of the users' computers are tied into a central data repository."
    "The solution is brilliant, the way it calculates its paths and trails is great."
    "The SD-WAN solution as it is already is quite feature-rich and the upgrade process is very simple."
    "We are using it widely for the local record for SaaS-based applications. Another valuable feature is a local breakout."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pros
    "It is very easy to deploy. The GUI interface is really good, and the security features are also very good. It is also stable and scalable, and their support is also good."
    "The most valuable aspects of the solution are the next-generation firewall features and geo-blocking capabilities."
    "The most valuable features are the main steering and the firewall. The security features and SD-WAN features are also quite good."
    "Versa FlexVNF is a scalable product because it does not have any hardware dependencies. This makes it a versatile solution that can be easily integrated with any firewall."
    "The granularity when it comes to configuration and security features are valuable."
    "The solution is stable and suitable."
    "Overall, it's nice and very user friendly. That's what makes it so successful. They give you complicated features but with a very simple user interface, and that's been a big success for them."
    "Versa is a good centralized solution, where you're setting up your infrastructure in a data center type thing."
    More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform pros
     

    Cons

    "I would like to either see the price reduced or have it packaged with other products to give better value for the money."
    "I am happy with this product. If anything, its price can be reduced. It is a bit expensive."
    "The solution's licensing model could be improved."
    "Citrix SD-WAN does not have the SD-WAN with one optimization in a single license. Other competitors have this option and it should be added to this solution."
    "Citrix should continue to offer a perpetual licensing model because it is very important to us."
    "Citrix SD-WAN's knowledge base has a few missing things, so you may need to seek help from support."
    "The communication around the life cycle would have been really helpful. The main issue we have had is related to the life cycle because some of the things that we are using were discontinued. They were discontinued within a year after we had purchased it, which is a bit painful. If we had known that, we would've made some other decisions."
    "Enhancements are needed to improve the stability."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] cons
    "There are limitations when you connect from multiple locations. It does not work as expected. If you have more than 400 users, then it will choke. It will not perform as expected."
    "Future releases should contain AI for the voice feature."
    "The UTM features can be improved. It should offer better functionality."
    "The smaller units lack a lot of functionality."
    "The security should be improved."
    "SASE is the next big thing that is coming up, and it needs to be developed in Versa. This is the only thing that needs to be adapted very quickly by Versa. With the pandemic going on, I would like to see more features for working from home. They have launched Versa Secure Access (VSA), but it is currently immature. They need to tighten it up for work from home and SD-WAN concept."
    "We've had the odd occasional stability issue with software upgrades."
    "The VPN feature is relatively new. It came out two releases ago, and they're still fixing that up."
    More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "I'm not quite sure of the price ranges. Roughly, the hidden devices can scale up to $20K for one appliance. However, the branch CPs are USD $1,000 to $2,500."
    "It is a bit expensive. A cheaper product would be good, but everybody likes things to be cheaper. We bought the devices up front, and then we pay for the annual support."
    "It depends on the scale. In our case, it would have been better if we had known about the life cycling steps, but otherwise, it is worth the money."
    "It's a little bit on the high side compared to the other products."
    "It would be helpful to have a demo license available for customers who want to prove the concept and conduct a proof of concept (POC) before committing to the solution. This is particularly important for customers in Egypt who often require a demonstration of the solution's features and compatibility with their needs before making any investment or incurring costs. Providing a demo license would allow customers to assess whether the solution would meet their needs or not."
    "Citrix SD-WAN is quite an affordable product."
    "The price is relatively expensive."
    "The price of the subscription should be cheaper."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    "It is neither cheap nor expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
    "While I cannot provide too much commentary on the price, I feel it to be fair for the moment."
    "We provide subscriptions for our customers on a yearly, not monthly, basis."
    "I find Versa a little more expensive than VMware in terms of remote access and secure web gateway elements."
    "It is not very expensive because of the white box support. Its hardware is much cheaper than other products. With the support for x86 and white box, it is one of the most cost-effective platforms that are currently available."
    "Price wise, it's more expensive than is the competition. I would give pricing a rating of three out of five."
    "The price is expensive but it makes sense for the market."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    21%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    7%
    Retailer
    7%
    Computer Software Company
    18%
    Financial Services Firm
    11%
    Manufacturing Company
    9%
    Government
    7%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Versa FlexVNF?
    Versa is a good centralized solution, where you're setting up your infrastructure in a data center type thing.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Versa FlexVNF?
    Both Versa and VMware are cheap in terms of the router. I find Versa a little more expensive than VMware in terms of remote access and secure web gateway elements.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Versa FlexVNF?
    We've had the odd occasional stability issue with software upgrades, etcetera. They don't support certain other third-party applications, which can be a bit limiting at times, whereas VMware seems ...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 31% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
    Compared 25% of the time
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
    Compared 20% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
    Compared 13% of the time
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Logo
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
    Compared 11% of the time
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Logo
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
    Compared 7% of the time
    More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    October 2024
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
    September 2024
    Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform reportDownload Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    Versa FlexVNF, FlexVNF, Versa Titan
     

    Learn More

    Citrix
    Versa Networks
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

    The Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is a comprehensive solution that provides secure access to cloud applications and services. It combines networking and security functions into a single platform, making it easier for organizations to manage their network infrastructure. The platform includes features such as SD-WAN, VPN, firewall, web filtering, and more. It also offers advanced security capabilities such as intrusion prevention, malware protection, and threat intelligence. With the Versa SASE Platform, organizations can ensure secure access to their cloud applications and services from any location, while also reducing costs and simplifying network management.

     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    CenturyLink, RCN Business, Colt Technology Services
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    September 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions. Updated: September 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.