Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs FatPipe WAN Optimization comparison

Citrix and FatPipe Networks are both solutions in the WAN Optimization category. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    FatPipe WAN Optimization
    • 120 Views
    • 55 Comparison Views
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 22, 2024

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] and FatPipe WAN Optimization are two prominent solutions in WAN optimization. FatPipe WAN Optimization seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced functionalities and overall performance.

    Features: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is valued for reliable connectivity, easy management, and strong security features. FatPipe WAN Optimization offers superior bandwidth management, advanced security protocols, and better integration capabilities. FatPipe's feature set is generally perceived as more advanced.

    Room for Improvement: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] could benefit from enhancements in scalability, more streamlined updates, and improved documentation. FatPipe WAN Optimization needs better documentation, simpler configuration processes, and enhancements in user interface design.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is praised for its straightforward deployment process and robust customer support. FatPipe WAN Optimization, while also providing good customer service, has a more complex deployment. Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is generally easier to deploy.

    Pricing and ROI: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers competitive pricing but users have mixed feedback on ROI. FatPipe WAN Optimization is considered pricier but is viewed as delivering better ROI due to advanced features. Users tend to feel that FatPipe is worth the higher cost due to its comprehensive capabilities.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: November 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    November 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Customer Service

    Sentiment score
    7.5
    Citrix SD-WAN customer support receives mixed feedback, praised for helpfulness but criticized for response times and inconsistent quality.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Room For Improvement

    Sentiment score
    5.9
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] needs easier setup, enhanced reporting, better technical support, improved security, and a refined licensing model.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Scalability Issues

    No sentiment score available
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers scalability, flexibility, and performance optimization, supporting enterprises and smaller setups but may require significant upgrades.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Setup Cost

    No sentiment score available
    Citrix SD-WAN pricing varies widely, with options for perpetual licenses, and costs ranging from $1,000 to $20,000 per deployment.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Stability Issues

    Sentiment score
    6.6
    Users find Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] stable with minimal maintenance, despite occasional power issues and hardware failures beyond Citrix's control.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Valuable Features

    Sentiment score
    8.3
    Citrix SD-WAN offers robust security, reliability, load balancing, ease of management, cost-effectiveness, and seamless failover with centralized online management.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.4
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    FatPipe WAN Optimization
    Average Rating
    0.0
    Number of Reviews
    0
    Ranking in other categories
    WAN Optimization (8th)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review
    Use FatPipe WAN Optimization?
    Share your opinion
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    22%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    8%
    Retailer
    6%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 31% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    No data available
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    November 2024
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    November 2024
    FatPipe WAN Optimization reportDownload FatPipe WAN Optimization product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    No data available
     

    Learn More

    Citrix
    FatPipe Networks
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

    With FatPipe WAN Optimization, you can measurably increase productivity levels as it reduces response time for interactive applications, helps speed-up large data transfers between your headquarters, branches and data storage and/or disaster recovery sites, thereby increasing speed of data transfer between sites.

     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    Information Not Available
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    November 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: November 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.