Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs Fortinet FortiGate comparison

Citrix and Fortinet are both solutions in the Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions category. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    Fortinet FortiGate
    Read 316 Fortinet FortiGate reviews
    • 11,636 Views
    • 8,201 Comparison Views
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 22, 2024

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] and Fortinet FortiGate are popular SD-WAN solutions. Fortinet FortiGate seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features, comprehensive security, and advanced routing options.

    Features: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is valued for its seamless integration, traffic management, and cost-effectiveness. Fortinet FortiGate offers comprehensive security features, advanced routing options, and a richer set of features.

    Room for Improvement: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] needs to address scalability issues, update hardware, and improve outdated components. Fortinet FortiGate could enhance its reporting tools, provide better configuration options, and make minor improvements for user convenience.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers straightforward deployment but receives mixed reviews on customer service. Fortinet FortiGate is praised for its efficient deployment and reliable customer service, offering a better overall experience.

    Pricing and ROI: Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and reasonable ROI. Fortinet FortiGate requires higher upfront costs but delivers strong ROI through extensive features and reliability, making it a better long-term investment.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Report (Updated: September 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    September 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 813,418 peers since 2012
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Fortinet FortiGate
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Number of Reviews
    316
    Ranking in other categories
    Firewalls (2nd), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (1st), WAN Edge (1st)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jul 4, 2023
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review
    DineshKumar28 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Sep 25, 2024
    Effective threat prevention with responsive customer support
    We are using Fortinet FortiGate as a firewall Fortinet FortiGate has been invaluable. It has helped save costs due to its various features, reliable performance, very good UI, low latency, and stability. The Threat Intel engine in Fortinet FortiGate is highly rated for its effectiveness in…
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The tool is quite cost-effective because it replaces the need for MPLS, which is a bit expensive...Citrix SD-WAN doesn't need much maintenance."
    "The reliability of connectivity is most valuable."
    "The most valuable feature of Citrix SD-WAN is customization. You are able to customize the solution to your needs."
    "It allows us to use additional VPNs, offering more options compared to other VPN solutions."
    "We are using it widely for the local record for SaaS-based applications. Another valuable feature is a local breakout."
    "Downtime for branch offices is now almost zero. We have 100% real-time visibility into all of our lines. MPLS links have been replaced with lower-cost links, saving a larger percentage of line costs. Overall, I see SD-WAN as a must. And the Citrix SD-WAN product has delivered on expectations and exceeded them. (With later firmware updates we now have good firewall capabilities in the product too)."
    "It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity."
    "They have a zero downtime failover mechanism, where, when there's a link failure or a link weakness, or bad link conditions, they provide the ability to fail back seamlessly."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pros
    "One of the nice things about FortiGate is that it can be deployed on the cloud or on-premises. You can actually do both. That's the biggest reason why I stick with this solution as opposed to something like Cisco Meraki. Another nice thing is that I can log directly into a FortiGate or get to it through their FortiCloud access products. They're pretty reliable and consistent. One of the reasons why I started using the product was their single pane of management. I can deploy their line of firewalls in conjunction with their switching and access points, and I can manage the entire network from one interface. I don't have to log into one interface for the firewall, another one for the access points, and another one for the switches. These firewalls have access point controller functionality built right into the system, so I don't even have to purchase additional devices to manage them."
    "Centralized monitoring, policy management, and virtualized appliances allow us to take control over our public and private infrastructure."
    "It's a firewall that secures our internal network. I have been using it since 2013, and I find that most of the features are advanced, and very user friendly."
    "It's very fast and easy to configure."
    "We can use our devices to check all of the perimeters. It secures email websites."
    "I like how we can achieve total integration."
    "The features that I have found most valuable are the SD-WAN and their IP4 policy."
    "The web tutor and automatic rules by schedule are good features."
    More Fortinet FortiGate pros
     

    Cons

    "The reports need to be improved. We need to have them customized but they don't have that right now. I would like for them to have better system predictions. We don't have that right now. My system may be working fine right now but after making some changes, that can change."
    "I would like to see support for additional reporting."
    "The only improvement for Citrix SD-WAN would be to lower its cost."
    "The price could be improved, it's an expensive solution."
    "The initial setup could be a bit easier."
    "The solution's licensing model could be improved."
    "I would like to either see the price reduced or have it packaged with other products to give better value for the money."
    "Citrix SD-WAN does not have the SD-WAN with one optimization in a single license. Other competitors have this option and it should be added to this solution."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] cons
    "Scalability is one of the disadvantages. When it comes to scalability, you have to actually change the box. If you want to upgrade it, you need to actually change the existing box and probably you take the system off to other sites."
    "Some of the features in the graphical user interface do not work, which requires that we used the command-line-interface."
    "We had a minor problem where there was a major system upgrade on the hardware platfrom and the Mac client was not available as soon as it might have been. The PC client was available immediately, but we had to wait a month or so, before there was a mac client. I was slightly irritated that it was not ready on time, but it was eventually resolved."
    "FortiGate should have a better way of detecting and managing the system memory because otherwise if the memory is too low, a system restart is required."
    "The solution lacks sufficient filtering."
    "In the future, I would like to see improvements made to cloud-based management."
    "Fortinet FortiGate can improve by integrating the web application firewall and the DDoS protection part of the solution. Having a WAF feature, web application firewall, and proxy together would be a good benefit."
    "In the balance between links feature normally you can just choose one option to balance. It would be better for the solution to have more than one option, preferably three."
    More Fortinet FortiGate cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The license was a one-time purchase. It's expensive."
    "It is a bit expensive. A cheaper product would be good, but everybody likes things to be cheaper. We bought the devices up front, and then we pay for the annual support."
    "Citrix SD-WAN is quite an affordable product."
    "The price is relatively expensive."
    "I believe that Citrix SD-WAN is a good investment, but I do not have the information to be more specific."
    "The price of the subscription should be cheaper."
    "It depends on the scale. In our case, it would have been better if we had known about the life cycling steps, but otherwise, it is worth the money."
    "I'm not quite sure of the price ranges. Roughly, the hidden devices can scale up to $20K for one appliance. However, the branch CPs are USD $1,000 to $2,500."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    "Other firewalls are more expensive than Fortinet FortiGate, such as the Azure firewall."
    "Here in Brazil, we're going through difficult economic times and the tax on the dollar is high. All the solutions from minor competitors are growing in the market. The prices have come more competitive."
    "The price, in comparison to other products is very cheap."
    "It was worth the money overall. It's good value."
    "It's very affordable."
    "The pricing is flexible."
    "We are on an annual license to use Fortinet FortiGate."
    "The license is yearly. We pay for the top end. It's called 360."
    More Fortinet FortiGate pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Comparison Review

    it_user216600 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jan 3, 2016
    Sophos UTM vs. Fortinet FortiGate
    I have used both Sophos and Fortinet products in production and I have found the Sophos UTM appliances (hardware and virtual) to be a better fit most of the time -- with a few caveats which I will touch on below. In both instances, the transition from TMG will be mostly straightforward. The main…
    Read full review
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    21%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    7%
    Retailer
    7%
    Educational Organization
    22%
    Computer Software Company
    15%
    Manufacturing Company
    6%
    Comms Service Provider
    6%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
    Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?
    When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage at large. In my opinion, Fortinet would be the best option and l use Fortinet too...
    See all answers
    What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?
    From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know the firewalls change every 5 to 7 years as stated but you really do need to upg...
    See all answers
    What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?
    As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite good. The most valuable features for me are their web and email filtering. I wou...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    Sophos XG vs Fortinet FortiGate Logo
    Sophos XG vs Fortinet FortiGate
    Compared 22% of the time
    Netgate pfSense vs Fortinet FortiGate Logo
    Netgate pfSense vs Fortinet FortiGate
    Compared 13% of the time
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate Logo
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate
    Compared 12% of the time
    Meraki MX vs Fortinet FortiGate Logo
    Meraki MX vs Fortinet FortiGate
    Compared 5% of the time
    WatchGuard Firebox vs Fortinet FortiGate Logo
    WatchGuard Firebox vs Fortinet FortiGate
    Compared 5% of the time
    More Fortinet FortiGate Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    October 2024
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Fortinet FortiGate
    October 2024
    Fortinet FortiGate reportDownload Fortinet FortiGate product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    FortiGate 60b, FortiGate 60c, FortiGate 80c, FortiGate 50b, FortiGate 200b, FortiGate 110c, FortiGate
     

    Learn More

    Citrix
    Fortinet
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

    Fortinet FortiGate enhances network security, prevents unauthorized access, and offers robust firewall protection. Valued features include advanced threat protection, reliable performance, and a user-friendly interface. It improves efficiency, streamlines processes, and boosts collaboration, providing valuable insights for informed decision-making and growth.

     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, IBM, Cisco, Dell, HP, Oracle, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Vodafone, Orange, BT Group, Telstra, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, CenturyLink, NTT Communications, Tata Communications, SoftBank, China Mobile, Singtel, Telus, Rogers Communications, Bell Canada, Telkom Indonesia, Telkom South Africa, Telmex, Telia Company, Telkom Kenya
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    September 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions. Updated: September 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.