Atlassian ALM vs Polarion ALM comparison

Atlassian and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Atlassian is ranked #18, while Siemens is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Atlassian holds a 1.3% mindshare in ALM, compared to Siemens’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Atlassian ALM

Read 6 Atlassian ALM reviews

716 Views
653 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Polarion ALM

Read 21 Polarion ALM reviews

4,208 Views
2,913 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Atlassian ALM

Polarion ALM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Atlassian ALM and Polarion ALM compete in the application lifecycle management category. Based on data comparisons, Atlassian leads in pricing and support, while Polarion offers superior features.

Features: Atlassian ALM provides integration capabilities, a collaborative platform, and tools for managing dynamic workflows. Polarion ALM features comprehensive traceability, process automation, and compliance management, excelling in tracking and reporting functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Atlassian ALM could improve its document control, increase integration with third-party tools, and enhance reporting capabilities. Polarion ALM may need a simpler user experience, more out-of-the-box functionality, and improvements in initial setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Atlassian ALM's cloud-based deployment is straightforward, with efficient customer support. Polarion ALM offers both cloud and on-premises deployment, providing flexibility but potentially requiring more setup effort, with extensive training for complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Atlassian ALM is cost-effective with scalable subscription models, offering strong ROI for agile projects. Polarion ALM justifies its higher cost with its extensive feature set, providing significant returns in complex environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlassian ALM vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atlassian ALM vs. Polarion ALM

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Atlassian ALM is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 7.8%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Xie Zhifeng

R&D Director, CTO at CSDN

Scrum board feature is highly valuable and handles different user volumes

We have both small-sized and big-sized customers. The small ones generally have around 50 to 200 users. The larger ones, for example, in China, have around 15,000 platform users. So, the number of small companies is high, but the total business value comes from the big companies. Atlassian ALM can handle different user volumes. For customers with more than 500 users, we recommend deploying a high availability (HA) architecture. The solution supports both single-node and HA modes. I would rate the scalability a five out of ten. It could be better in terms of scalability with more users. It could be improved to better handle larger numbers of users. We have clients using Atlassian ALM both in China and globally. We have around 20 clients using this solution.

Read full review

Dina Bindi

Information and Communication technology at CNH Industrial

Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility

It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main power of this tool is the integration between the different products of the Atlassian suite. We have good integration with work management with Java. This is the major strength from this provider."

"This solution fits very well into our agile product management environment."

"The most valuable feature is the Scrum board."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its browser experience. I rate its traceability feature a ten out of ten. From the initial stage to the release, you can manage everything through a single point."

"It offers good performance."

"It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."

"We had a nice experience with technical support."

"You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs."

"It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."

"The software is stable."

"The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it."

More Polarion ALM pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the high-level project management."

"The reports are not really customizable, which is something that they should improve on."

"The automation for scheduling software and doing software tests should be simplified because it's complex and too rigid."

"Integration requires a lot of effort. You typically need to work with an implementation partner to get it done. Most connectors available for Polarion ALM are paid. Unlike other vendors offering several standard connectors for free, integrating third-party software with Polarion ALM involves discussing and coordinating with the third-party software providers, which requires effort."

"The solution needs to improve its user experience and graphics."

"We use PTC Windchill, and Polarion ALM doesn't have native integration, so we had to purchase the connector to integrate it with Polarion ALM. We still haven't implemented it."

"Test management lacks an automated process."

"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."

"The user interface is not yet optimized."

"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."

"The solution's editing capabilities need improvement."

More Polarion ALM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a community edition available, but if the price were lower for the addons then more people would use the full version."

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"It is an expensive product."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

"The solution is expensive."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Atlassian ALM?

The most valuable feature is the Scrum board.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian ALM?

The pricing is on the higher side. I would give it an eight out of ten, where one is low, and ten is high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atlassian ALM?

There is room for improvement in the high-level project management. In future releases, I would like to have a planning feature for high-level project management.

See all answers

What do you like most about Polarion ALM?

It is a very stable solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system. This could greatly enhance requirement checking, improve form, content, and clarity, an...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

We use Polarion ALM for software development, including requirements management, testing, change requests, and task tracking. We set up the environment by configuring items and reports based on use...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs Atlassian ALM

Compared 48% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Atlassian ALM

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Atlassian ALM

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs Atlassian ALM

Compared 8% of the time

Codebeamer vs Atlassian ALM

Compared 7% of the time

More Atlassian ALM Competitors

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 27% of the time

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 16% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Polarion ALM

Compared 1% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atlassian ALM

March 2025

Download Atlassian ALM product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM

March 2025

Download Polarion ALM product report

Overview

How to use Atlassian to manage application lifecycle: Atlassian builds software to pull together all the elements of application lifecycle management. Product management, developers, Q/A, dev ops, and business stake holders all have their own ways of interacting with application lifecycle management and Atlassian splits up the process into a few buckets.

1) Collaborate to plan and envision work

Atlassian's Confluence is a collaboration platform for building and driving consensus. Call stake holders in to give approval, comment on, and share pages and integrate with the rest of the development toolchain.

2) Build and track roadmaps

Atlassian's JIRA Software offers incredibly flexible project management with custom workflows, plugins, and high visibility rollups through JIRA Portfolio. Issues can be embedded right in confluence, or be used to kick off new branches in version control. Keep everyone on the same page with project progress.

3) Track and deploy code

Atlassian's Bitbucket is the world's most robust Git solution. The ability to deploy multiple-nodes with failover, global mirroring for super fast clones, and powerful code review control set it apart from competition. Bitbucket also has a mature plugin and hooks system that allows extensions and connection to a suite of CI software.

4) Support and Iterate

Track support requests, bugs, and route users in the right direction with JIRA Service Desk. With the same custom workflow engine as JIRA Software, a tight integration with the rest of the stack, and a knowledge base function make it a powerful addition to the ALM stack.

5) Tie it together

ChatOps helps tie every part of the ALM together. Get stake holders in the same room to manage a project, teams in the same page to manage their work, or plugin automated members to report on CI status, pull requests, page changes in Confluence, or bug reports. Like every piece of Atlassian's ALM there is a mature API for extending plugins and everything can be hosted behind your own firewall.

Atlassian

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

Buyer's Guide

Atlassian ALM vs. Polarion ALM

March 2025

Free Report: Atlassian ALM vs. Polarion ALM

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian ALM vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlassian ALM vs. Polarion ALM report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.