AttackIQ vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform comparison

AttackIQ vs. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 885,728 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AttackIQ

Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (48th), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (5th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (18th)

Tenable One Exposure Manage...

Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of AttackIQ is 6.6%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is 5.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AttackIQ	6.6%
Tenable One Exposure Management Platform	5.6%
Other	87.8%

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783439

DevOps at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees

Continuous offensive testing has transformed our cloud security and prioritizes critical fixes

The continuous testing and continuous offensive testing are among the best features that AttackIQ offers, and being able to categorize it based on criticality such as very critical, emergency, high, medium, and low is valuable. AttackIQ allows us to resolve issues much quicker because these issues come in categories, enabling us to prioritize them and fix the emergency issues first. It has definitely reduced response time and improved our discoverability of these issues in the first place.

Read full review

Jaya Shanker

IT Security Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has improved our vulnerability tracking and supports cloud-based monitoring with scheduled scans

We don't have any issues with Tenable One Exposure Management Platform. It works well for us, but the only problem is the licensing aspect. In the license, it becomes problematic because when we go to cloud security for vulnerability management, it will take five licenses instead of the one-on-one license that vulnerability exposure management requires. The license needs to be reviewed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product."

"After using AttackIQ, it has helped the team and the company improve on false positives and reduce risk, as most people are now capable of identifying how to work on detection, improving fine-tuning and all those things."

"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."

"AttackIQ is solving a lot of the problems that I had before or that we as an organization had before, even the security team, so it is solving all my issues."

"We find Tenable One Exposure Management Platform vulnerability prioritization effective overall because, with the scheduled scan running on our set schedule, we can remediate any findings and check on the next schedule if issues are closed, making it much easier for us to monitor vulnerabilities."

"Tenable EP is a great overall product for our customers; it's great at helping customers to identify current risks, it helps customers manage their risk, users can effectively analyze risk and can assign team members to take a look at items as well, the solution is very easy to set up, technical support is very helpful and responsive, and the pricing is pretty good."

"For me, the setup has been an easy process."

"I think it's a good product for risk-based or exposure-based vulnerability management."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The product gives us a lot of insight."

"The feature of vulnerability management and discovery is what I use."

Cons

"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."

"The initial setup was difficult. It was not straightforward."

"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."

"Tenable needs to provide a better way to manage private clouds."

"The license needs to be reviewed."

"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address. Sometimes they behave abruptly, requiring me to rework reinstalling the sensors on the endpoints."

"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."

"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AttackIQ?

AttackIQ can be improved by implementing more of a security training platform focused on real-world scenarios, simulating real-world attack behavior aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK and NIST frame...

What is your primary use case for AttackIQ?

My main use case for AttackIQ is conducting breach and attack simulation or any kind of new ransomware simulation, basically for executing particular real-world attack scenarios. Regarding my main ...

What advice do you have for others considering AttackIQ?

In my current organization, we are not using AttackIQ; in my previous organization, I have used AttackIQ, and it was more of hands-on training rather than being deployed as a typical tool for impro...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.ep?

I think the price of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is reasonable for us.

What needs improvement with Tenable.ep?

What is your primary use case for Tenable.ep?

We use Tenable One Exposure Management Platform for vulnerability management in our internal application and external application, and also for cloud security. We are using the web application feat...

Picus Security vs AttackIQ

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Cymulate vs AttackIQ

Compared 11% of the time

Pentera vs AttackIQ

Compared 11% of the time

SafeBreach vs AttackIQ

Compared 10% of the time

Cybersixgill vs AttackIQ

Compared 4% of the time

More AttackIQ Competitors

XM Cyber vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Download AttackIQ product report

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

Download Tenable One Exposure Management Platform product report

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform report

Also Known As

DeepSurface

Tenable.ep

Overview

AttackIQ offers a cybersecurity platform focusing on security optimization through breach and attack simulation, enabling organizations to assess and improve their defense mechanisms effectively.

Using advanced technology, AttackIQ helps organizations evaluate security processes against real-world threat scenarios. Its platform provides continuous security assessments, which help in identifying vulnerabilities before exploitation by adversaries. It allows for the strategic allocation of resources towards enhancing security through actionable insights and reporting.

What key features make AttackIQ stand out?

Breach and Attack Simulation: Conducts realistic attack scenarios to test defenses.
Automated Testing: Regularly checks security protocols against evolving threats.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights into security performance metrics.
Threat Intelligence Integration: Incorporates global threat data for precise assessments.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Improved Security Posture: Leads to a reduction in potential system breaches.
Resource Optimization: Allows allocation of resources to high-risk areas.
Enhanced Awareness: Increases understanding of threat landscapes within teams.
Risk Mitigation: Identifies weaknesses before they result in data leaks.

Industries such as finance and healthcare, highly sensitive to data breaches, utilize AttackIQ for its rigorous testing capabilities. By simulating sophisticated cyber threats, organizations within these sectors can better protect critical data and maintain compliance with stringent regulatory standards.

AttackIQ

You can now translate technical asset, vulnerability and threat data into clear business insights and actionable intelligence for security executives. Combine broad exposure coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps and identity platforms, with threat intelligence and data science from Tenable Research. Focus efforts to prevent likely attacks and accurately communicate cyber risk to support optimal business performance.

Tenable One is an exposure management platform that combines risk-based vulnerability management, web application security, cloud security and identity security.

Tenable

AttackIQ vs. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform