Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AttackIQ vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AttackIQ
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (9th)
Tenable One Exposure Manage...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (14th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

AttackIQ and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AttackIQ is designed for Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) and holds a mindshare of 7.1%, down 9.4% compared to last year.
Tenable One Exposure Management Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM), holds 0.8% mindshare, down 1.3% since last year.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

BN
Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up
I can't think of any features that are lacking just now. It does everything I need it to do. I don't have too much experience with the solution. I need more time to really study the solution to see if there are any shortcomings. The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time.
Wanderley Viana - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly scalable and reasonably priced solution that provides insight into user activities
Access management must be improved. The access manager, security tool, and access control need very big improvements. It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies. For now, we can detect the violations but not respond. If we could enforce policies, it would be a quicker way to block something.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"For me, the setup has been an easy process."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The product gives us a lot of insight."
 

Cons

"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."
"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."
"Tenable needs to provide a better way to manage private clouds."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Tenable.ep?
The product gives us a lot of insight.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.ep?
It's very expensive. I would give it an eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with Tenable.ep?
Tenable has to improve its cloud solution. They're only supporting AWS and Azure. Tenable partially supports Google Cloud but not fully. Tenable needs to give private cloud also. So, Tenable needs ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.ep
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.