AuditBoard vs IBM Blueworks Live comparison

The compared AuditBoard and IBM solutions aren't in the same category. AuditBoard is ranked #3 in G , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 7.4% mindshare in the category. IBM is ranked #12 in BPD , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

1,535 Views
768 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Blueworks Live

Read 20 IBM Blueworks Live reviews

2,520 Views
1,636 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

IBM Blueworks Live

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AuditBoard and IBM Blueworks Live based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, AuditBoard and others in GRC.

To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GRC

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (3rd), IT Vendor Risk Management (4th)

IBM Blueworks Live

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (12th)

Mindshare comparison

AuditBoard and IBM Blueworks Live aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AuditBoard is designed for GRC and holds a mindshare of 7.4%, up 4.6% compared to last year.
IBM Blueworks Live, on the other hand, focuses on Business Process Design, holds 3.6% mindshare, up 3.2% since last year.

GRC

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar

IT GRC Manager at Capgemini

User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features

There are lots of features. We like the reviewer and auditor, where they support you if you want to upload evidence. At the same time the reviewer or auditor can also put their remark. The solution is user-friendly. It's easy to set up. You can easily find out how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload that evidence, and how you can put in a remark. Everything is a single console where you can easily track what you need. It's stable. The product is scalable. They provide a demo to customers to allow them to explore the tools.

Read full review

AjarMathur

Global Innovation Director at Ernst & Young

An easily scalable and affordable solution that enables users to document and digitize processes with ease

IBM Blueworks is BPMN 2.0 compliant, but it does not adapt to the overarching BPMN 2.0 concepts. There is only one kind of BPMN 2.0 diagram. It is a process diagram. It doesn't have the concept of separate tools, which other products offer. If I had to do a hardcore BPMN 2.0 modeling, the product would have its own reservations. There were features we could not explore from a BPMN 2.0 perspective. Most of the time, people who are shifting from Microsoft Office tools to a digitized way of working still want the reporting capabilities to be strong. Some tools, like ARIS or Signavio, offer customized solutions from the reporting perspective. If I have documented my whole finance process and want to fetch out a complete SOP report in a very customized manner, IBM Blueworks cannot provide it. We have to rely on some other services. So that's one area in which we always struggled, how to really customize the reporting aspects. I understand that we need to keep the tool a little more asset-light. It's very difficult to keep adding many options, but at least a few BPMN 2.0 options were needed. We have been suggesting to IBM that we should have some way of customizing the reporting. At least we should get a custom way of reporting it into different formats like Excel or putting up a logo for one of the clients so that their SAP can be printed that way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

"Considering the solution's return on investment, it has been extremely helpful since we were doing a lot of documentation. Previously, in our company, we were using an Excel sheet which made things quite messy."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."

More AuditBoard pros

"For me the most valuable feature is that it's one depository for our bank. So it's not like everybody has their critical processes on SharePoint or on their desktops. Everything is centrally located. It's very intuitive, easy to use. The support that I get from IBM is always great."

"It's very easy, very quick to create a process map. It has templates. The look and feel is very nice. What we want to achieve out of the process map, we can achieve it using Blueworks."

"It enables decisions based upon processes that we do model, and ultimately move forward with."

"For me, what I find to be the most valuable is its simplicity and the association with Microsoft Office."

"The business process discovery is excellent. The diagram or blueprinting functionality of the solution are very good. It's quite easy. You can link the sub-processes and get a big overview of the whole process then."

"The solution is stable. All the refreshes run very well."

"I like the two-tiered approach, that is, discover and then drill down to the main steps. You can right click and attach risk, policies, and much more. It is a user-friendly solution."

"This solution is good at utilizing standards rules for connectivity."

More IBM Blueworks Live pros

Cons

"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"Everything is there, and I have no disadvantage to note as of now."

"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."

"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

More AuditBoard cons

"The initial setup is neither straightforward nor complex however you do need to know what you are doing."

"The user interface is quite easy at first but process analysts soon run into roadblocks of limited functionality, which is disappointing."

"We would like the ability to add additional custom colors. We would like to color additional items to add notes to the blueprint."

"IBM Blueworks is BPMN 2.0 compliant, but it does not adapt to the overarching BPMN 2.0 concepts."

"In the solution Signavio, they have a customer journey mapping feature that should be added to IBM Blueworks Live. It's valuable to map or document the customer journey to identify the pains and opportunities in this process."

"We'd also like to see it be Six Sigma or Lean compatible, a lot of people have asked about that."

"Sometimes, the tool is automatic, which can complicate it, but once you're accustomed to manipulating it, you can use it very effectively."

"It is BPMN-compliant but the tool needs to be more involved to get into a completely 2.0 oriented tool. It has a few things but it's not the complete BPMN model."

More IBM Blueworks Live cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Based on the licenses purchased, from a footprint perspective, you can have as many people as you want. You have multiple different categories of licenses to keep the cost low."

"Price wise, IBM Blueworks Live is in the middle range, and I would give it a five out of ten."

"Making it less expensive would be good."

"There are editor licenses that are around 50 euros per month, and contributor licenses that are around 30 euros per month."

"The solution is very, very cost-effective."

"The solution is not very expensive."

"We are seeing ROI from this solution. The solution has saved us time."

"They have a free subscription model that gives a lot of power to the users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuditBoard?

I believe the license is based on the number of key controls that will be tested regularly. You can also pay extra for additional modules, like risk testing and operational audits, etc.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Blueworks Live?

The solution is easy to operate. Also, there is an automatic mode to make the business flow. You don't have to put any lines or arrows in a decision point in IBM Blueworks Live; it's very automatic.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Blueworks Live?

The solution costs around 600-700 dollars/year, which is quite affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Blueworks Live?

Sometimes, the tool is automatic, which can complicate it, but once you're accustomed to manipulating it, you can use it very effectively.

See all answers

Comparisons

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 45% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 22% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 21% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

Visio vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 35% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 17% of the time

Lucidchart vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 16% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 10% of the time

ARIS BPA vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Blueworks Live Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

February 2025

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Blueworks Live

February 2025

Download IBM Blueworks Live product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Lombardi Blueprint

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

IBM Blueworks Live is a cloud-based business process modeling tool that helps you discover, map and document your processes. It is easy to use, allowing you to learn and perform business process modeling in minutes.

With Blueworks Live you can:

Simplify business process modeling
Quickly build business processes in a straightforward, cloud-based interface designed for both IT and business users.

Improve process efficiency and accuracy
A central process repository eliminates version control and consistency issues by providing users real-time access to process workflows.

Enhance cross-team collaboration
A shared team workspace engages all business process owners, encouraging cross-team participation and continuous process improvement.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cloudsoft Corp. Ltd., Bayer, S¾SS, Essex County Council

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, AuditBoard and others in GRC. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.