Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Auth0 vs Ubisecure Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
Auth0 provides secure, scalable JWT-based authentication with easy integration, enterprise appeal, customization, and strong developer support.
No sentiment score available
The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
Auth0 is praised for its stability, performance, strong integration, and support, with users rarely experiencing disruptions or issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
Auth0 efficiently scales for large users, swiftly handling issues, though on-premise setups may need more detailed guidance.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Auth0 support is valued for responsiveness and helpfulness, though engineer changes and outreach issues exist for smaller accounts.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.1
Auth0's pricing is seen as generally cost-effective but can be confusing and costly, especially with extra features.
No sentiment score available
The cost of the solution itself was cost-effective enough that I didn't even need to compare it with EntraID.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.2
Auth0 needs better documentation, customization, pricing clarity, multi-tenancy, advanced authorization, IoT integration, and robust MFA capabilities.
No sentiment score available
By default, the user profile does not contain the name, first name, or address, which I would expect.
 

Categories and Ranking

Auth0
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Access Management (2nd)
Ubisecure Identity Platform
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (42nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Auth0 is 27.6%, down from 32.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubisecure Identity Platform is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Anees Shoukat - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing security and flexibility with runtime API keys
We use the solution for API security and management. We implement our solution with almost ten to fifteen vendors' APIs, like Salesforce and HubSpot.  It involves generating leads, invites, adding contacts, and opportunities, mostly challenging with Salesforce integration due to limited…
Use Ubisecure Identity Platform?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Media Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Auth0?
It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auth0?
The pricing depends on the tier you are in. If you’re in enterprise support, there’s always someone who can support you. But if you’re in lower tiers or starter tiers, we have crossed that barrier ...
What needs improvement with Auth0?
There is no immediate need for improvement. However, better documentation for Salesforce integration is suggested. Multi-factor authentication could be considered for future research.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota
S Group, SokoPro, Finnish Goverment, Ecraft, Grano
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.