AutoSys Workload Automation vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Broadcom and Salesforce are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Salesforce is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 16.8% mindshare in WA, compared to Salesforce’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 79 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

8,554 Views
6,274 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 55 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

211 Views
191 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and AutoSys Workload Automation are two robust solutions in the integration and automation space. Users prefer the comprehensive features and ease of use of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, while AutoSys Workload Automation stands out for its solid performance in workload automation.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API management, connectivity, and integration capabilities. User reviews highlight its ability to connect various applications seamlessly. AutoSys Workload Automation is praised for its scheduling and batch processing functionalities. Users find it reliable for automating complex workflows. MuleSoft’s breadth in integration fosters broader use cases, whereas AutoSys specializes in depth within workload automation.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that MuleSoft could benefit from enhanced documentation and simplified licensing. AutoSys users express the need for a more modernized design and increased compatibility with newer systems. While MuleSoft users request more supportive resources, AutoSys users look for better adaptability to current technology trends.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform receives positive feedback for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Users appreciate its cloud integration support. In contrast, AutoSys Workload Automation users experience a steeper learning curve during deployment but praise its robust service once operational. MuleSoft simplifies initial setup, while AutoSys emerges as dependable post-deployment.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform users report satisfaction with pricing given its extensive functionality, though some find it premium-priced. AutoSys Workload Automation users consider the pricing justified based on the product’s reliability, despite recognizing higher upfront costs. MuleSoft offers a balanced cost for its comprehensive tools, whereas AutoSys sees higher initial investment offset by operational sturdiness.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 801,634 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Workload Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 16.8%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Mar 18, 2024

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Khedkar Bhagyashree

Technical Lead at DFS Singapore Pte Ltd

Mar 18, 2024

Easy to set it up, good support but we need to use APIs for external integration

When it comes to external systems, we need to use APIs. So, it needs some extra effort. When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward. We need to use RESTful APIs to get and push messages. While it's doable, it's not as simple as using the pre-built connectors. In future releases, Anypoint MQ can increase the message size limit a little bit. We faced issues while working with SAP integrations. SAP can have very large files, and we couldn't handle those within the Anypoint MQ limit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives us flexibility when doing releases. We can make changes for one day in a PDS member, since we stage our jobs by date, and the next day the normal job definitions are run."

"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."

"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."

"The flexibility in solving job scheduling challenges allows us to successfully integrate an acquired business’ fiscal close with our own, even though there is a lot of variance as to when they run in the calendar month."

"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."

"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."

"Automation of patch process."

"We automate recurring processes, keeping track of IT processes controlled worldwide."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"Initially, we faced challenges managing numerous scheduled jobs and duplicate entries in our SAP system. To address this, we developed a reusable component in Mule that all applications could use to interact with SAP."

"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."

"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."

"API management."

"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."

"The tool helps with order management and automates the enterprise's orchestration, invoice creation, product maintenance, and product life cycle. The API manager feature helps us configure, secure, and call APIs."

"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."

"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"The WCC could be improved."

"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."

"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."

"The graphical interface can be improved."

"More benefits with the agent upgrades, and that's about it. Other than that we have no complaints with it. It's been awesome."

"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."

"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."

"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."

"Information on monitoring could be improved."

"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."

"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."

"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."

"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."

"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."

"The stability could be better."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The solution has a high price."

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

47%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

We paid to use the solution monthly.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 42% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

September 2024

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

August 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Learn More

Broadcom

Salesforce

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

September 2024

Free Report: AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.