SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer and Auvik Network Management are competing network management tools. Users generally prefer Auvik Network Management due to its feature set and ease of deployment.
Features: SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer offers detailed traffic monitoring, comprehensive traffic analysis, and customizable alerts. Auvik Network Management provides automated network discovery, real-time network insights, and comprehensive network mapping.
Room for Improvement: SolarWinds needs enhancements in scalability, performance during peak times, and user interface. Auvik requires better backup functionalities, fewer time-consuming updates, and improved reporting features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds has straightforward deployment but needs consistent customer support. Auvik is noted for easy installation and responsive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds setup cost is high but justified by functionality. Auvik offers competitive pricing and higher perceived ROI.
They were knowledgeable and responded quickly with accurate and useful information.
We were unable to integrate Auvik with a geographical map, which limited our ability to track issues to specific buildings on campus.
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
Auvik Core's ease of use also enhanced troubleshooting speed and efficiency.
Auvik is a network management software that provides real-time visibility and control over network infrastructure.
It automates network mapping, monitoring, and troubleshooting, allowing IT teams to easily identify and resolve issues.
With its intuitive interface and powerful features, Auvik helps businesses optimize their network performance and ensure smooth operations.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.