AWS CodeBuild vs CircleCI comparison

Read 9 CircleCI reviews

1,158 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

CircleCI and AWS CodeBuild compete in the continuous integration and delivery domain. AWS CodeBuild has the upper hand due to its extensive feature sets and integration capabilities, making it especially appealing to those within the AWS ecosystem. CircleCI is favored for its ease of use and robust customer support.

Features: CircleCI offers strong capabilities with customizable workflows and seamless integration with popular development tools. AWS CodeBuild provides broad integration options and extensive scalability, particularly beneficial for extensive AWS users. CircleCI is known for its straightforward setup, while AWS CodeBuild offers features critical to enterprises requiring complex integrations.

Room for Improvement: CircleCI could improve by offering more extensive integrations beyond popular tools and enhancing scalability for larger enterprise requirements. It might also benefit from offering a wider variety of pre-configured environments. AWS CodeBuild could enhance its user-friendliness for non-AWS users and streamline its setup process. Additionally, it could improve its integration flexibility to accommodate non-AWS services efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CircleCI provides a rapid deployment process with comprehensive support, which is efficient for quick setup times. AWS CodeBuild offers vast integration within the AWS suite, resulting in a more involved setup but with extensive documentation and support suitable for larger projects. CircleCI’s ease of use is a distinct difference from AWS CodeBuild’s robust integration capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: CircleCI is praised for its transparent pricing and beneficial ROI, appealing to smaller to mid-sized businesses. AWS CodeBuild is noted for competitive pricing within the AWS ecosystem, offering value through its comprehensive feature set and potential long-term savings for large-scale deployments, despite higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI Report (Updated: February 2026).

AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI

Download the complete report

Helped 882,606 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

13th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (203rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CircleCI is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS CodeBuild	2.2%
CircleCI	3.5%
Other	94.3%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

SomdipRoy

Solution Architect at Skillnetinc

Has enabled automated deployments through continuous integration and supports multi-environment delivery

My recommendation for AWS CodeBuild to make it better for the next release would be something within AWS CodeBuild which can support the repository functions as well. It may not be as powerful as GitHub Actions, but it provides a very competitive price compared to GitHub Actions. GitHub Actions, if you want to use the YML CI/CD pipeline, gives a free tier of around three thousand hours per month. AWS CodeBuild is a little more expensive than that. However, if it supports the repository function as well along with it, then it will be a complete package. Everything would be in AWS, including the code versioning, code commit to the code infrastructure, to the code database, to the networking, and how the applications are accessed. Everything would be in one place, which would be very helpful. I believe AWS CodeBuild is a bit expensive because GitHub provides around three thousand minutes free, plus it has the free repository function as well. At the enterprise level, it charges maybe around nineteen dollars per user, though I do not remember exactly. In terms of AWS CodeBuild, I believe it is a bit expensive because it is providing only the deployment features. It is not providing the repository. In that comparison, I would say it is a little bit expensive.

Read full review

Manas Kashyap

DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automated parallel pipelines have accelerated deployments but complex configs still need simplification

CircleCI can be improved by making it less costly, as it is very expensive. The config complexity, like the YAML config, can become messy in complex projects. Making it simpler, much like having a Docker Compose YAML or Kubernetes YAML, is necessary from that perspective. Rather than keeping it a SaaS project, they can think of it through a Jenkins approach, where we can also self-host it into our environment, but it is acceptable. It is very expensive, and many organizations cannot afford it. The config complexity, like the YAML configs, can become messy in complex projects. A better DevOps person can only handle it, not a normal person. For that reason, I chose a rating of seven. It is quite expensive, to be honest. As mentioned, many organizations cannot afford it because of the parallel execution prices as well as the config complexity.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."

"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

"The integration is a good feature."

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"The integration is a good feature."

"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"It's a stable product."

"Running parallel jobs where dev gets automatically updated every time has helped our team significantly."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"CircleCI has positively impacted the organization, as it has been used for many years and serves as the main source for application deployment."

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

More CircleCI pros

Cons

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."

"I believe AWS CodeBuild is a bit expensive because GitHub provides around three thousand minutes free, plus it has the free repository function as well."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

"Billing is a mess."

"I rated CircleCI six out of ten because I think they need more transparency in pricing, as there are instances of unclear network data transfer and storage costs related to caching and workspaces."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"CircleCI can be improved by making it less costly, as it is very expensive."

"A return on investment with CircleCI has not been observed, and no relevant metrics such as time saved or fewer employees needed can be shared."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Media Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I only used CircleCI on the free tier.

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

I think CircleCI can improve in terms of pricing and needs to bring more unique selling points to stay competitive as there are many other cloud solutions such as GitHub Actions and Azure DevOps th...

What advice do you have for others considering CircleCI?

I really appreciate the good speed, which is faster and definitely the most important feature for me.To ensure that security and compliance requirements are met while using CircleCI, we utilize res...

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 14% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 10% of the time

TeamCity vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 9% of the time

Harness vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Tekton vs CircleCI

Compared 10% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 8% of the time

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 8% of the time

Bazel vs CircleCI

Compared 4% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeBuild

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Download CircleCI product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that automates software development, streamlining the process for engineers and developers. It's valued for its ability to enhance development speed while maintaining high software quality.

Known for its robust CI/CD capabilities, CircleCI supports a wide range of programming languages and integrations, allowing teams to build and deploy code with efficiency and reliability. Its flexibility and automation features help teams quickly adapt to changing project requirements. CircleCI's cloud-based architecture ensures scalability and accessibility, making it an attractive option for modern development environments.

What are CircleCI's key features?

Continuous Integration: Automates code integration with testing to catch errors early.
Continuous Deployment: Simplifies the process of deploying code to production environments.
Customizable Workflows: Offers flexibility in defining build, test, and deployment stages.
Parallel Execution: Speeds up builds by running multiple tasks at once.
VCS Integration: Seamlessly integrates with platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket.

What benefits can users expect when using CircleCI?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines development workflows, reducing the time to market.
Improved Code Quality: Early error detection through automation increases overall quality.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing workloads as development needs evolve.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared visibility and control over development processes.

In tech-driven industries, CircleCI enables efficient software development pipelines. Its ability to run automated tests and manage deployments effectively is particularly beneficial in fast-paced, innovation-driven fields like fintech, mobile app development, and SaaS platforms. Offering tools that meet high-demand environments, it supports teams in delivering timely and quality software products.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

AWS CodeBuild vs. CircleCI