AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Synology DSM comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Synology are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.6, while Synology is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to Synology’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Synology users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 16 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

548 Views
450 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Synology DSM

Read 10 Synology DSM reviews

1,810 Views
1,510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Synology DSM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Synology DSM offer disaster recovery solutions with distinct features, user reviews, and deployment processes; preferences depend on user priorities in each category. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and seamless cloud integration.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery features include scalability, seamless cloud integration, compatibility, and automated recovery options. Synology DSM features comprehensive data management, backup capabilities, robust NAS capabilities, and flexibility.

Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users seek enhancements in setup complexity, documentation, and learning curve. Synology DSM users note improvements needed in mobile app functionality, firmware updates, and streamlined updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery benefits from a straightforward cloud-based deployment model backed by strong customer support, though some find it initially complex. Synology DSM offers easier on-premises deployment with an intuitive setup process but receives mixed feedback on the responsiveness of customer service.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery entails higher setup costs but delivers strong ROI through efficient disaster recovery. Synology DSM offers more affordable upfront costs with consistent ROI, appealing for budget-conscious users. Both have loyal user bases, with AWS seen as a long-term investment and Synology popular for cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Synology DSM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Synology DSM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (19th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th)

Synology DSM

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Synology DSM is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Managed services with seamless integration and good reliability

Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status. I have to calculate whether my data is replicated to the Adarabad region or not. These features, if available in AWS, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Michael Adejoh

Solutions Manager at Excel Connect Ventures

Reliable and cost-effective

One area where Synology DSM could improve is in enhancing its ability to detect and respond to security threats during backups and replication. Currently, it lacks the capability to automatically stop backups if it detects a virus or suspicious network activity, as some third-party solutions can. Having AI-driven analytics to identify anomalies and halt backups during potential attacks, along with notifications to administrators, would be valuable. Additionally, providing a dashboard for monitoring the backup environment's security would be a beneficial feature. These improvements would help address security concerns and make Synology more competitive in this aspect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We went from an organization with minimal to no disaster recovery. I was able to spin up the disaster recovery environment with AWS rather quickly and meet business requirements."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a robust and reliable solution for disaster recovery needs."

"It provides our disaster recovery solution. It works fine in our tests."

"The most valuable aspect of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is its instant block replication feature. This allows us to perform live block verification and eliminates the need to concern ourselves with recovery point objectives. This capability is particularly advantageous for critical workloads."

"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."

"It offers seamless integration with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate for deploying containerized applications."

"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."

"The initial setup is really straightforward."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"Because of its simplicity and the wide array of features it offers, I would recommend DSM for both tech-savvy individuals and those who prefer a straightforward file-serving solution."

"Synology DSM is very easy to work and operate."

"It offers a variety of software options through its package center, allowing users to customize their NAS device to serve multiple purposes."

"The most valuable aspect is its ability to handle multiple disks."

"The most valuable features of Synology DSM are its security and connectivity."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it serves as a backup for our company's virtual machine."

"The product performs well. It is easy to use and implement."

"The most valuable features are the basic storage, file management, Btrfs file system, and built-in backups that come with the solution."

More Synology DSM pros

Cons

"The cost of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is seen as expensive."

"The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

"Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information."

"An improved AWS pricing model is needed."

"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."

"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"Synology DSM is a good enough solution for small and medium companies, but I have not seen a big configuration of the solution for a big organization."

"The only bothersome aspect is that the device is aging."

"Users may lose their data if they don't configure the solution properly."

"There's a surveillance application that allows you to connect IP cameras and stream footage to Synology and it is a great feature, but it's not always clear that adding more cameras may require purchasing additional licenses."

"The platform could be much more cost-effective and flexible for integrating third-party products."

"Synology DSM's user interface is not quite intuitive."

"The product's only shortcoming is pricing, as it is an expensive solution."

"Even though Synology provides a backup solution, it does not recognize the VM movement across cluster hosts."

More Synology DSM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"The pricing varies widely, catering to a broad range of needs."

"Synology DSM is a cheap solution."

"The licensing part of the solution is free. The hardware is more expensive than the other solutions in the market, but it's okay in the long run."

"Synology DSM is a free tool."

"The solution’s pricing is neither cheap nor expensive."

"It is quite an affordable solution."

"The price of the solution is very good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The setup is actually managed by our partner. I have taken a rate of per user. Licensing is completely managed by the partner. I am paying per user and per GB storage cost, while the infrastructure...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as pu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Synology DSM?

The most valuable features of Synology DSM are its security and connectivity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Synology DSM?

The solution’s pricing is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Synology DSM?

Users may lose their data if they don't configure the solution properly.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 40% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 20% of the time

Zerto vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Synology DSM

Compared 20% of the time

NetApp SnapCenter vs Synology DSM

Compared 9% of the time

UrBackup vs Synology DSM

Compared 7% of the time

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Synology DSM

Compared 6% of the time

LiteSpeed for SQL Server vs Synology DSM

Compared 5% of the time

More Synology DSM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

April 2025

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Synology DSM

March 2025

Download Synology DSM product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM)

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Synology DSM (DiskStation Manager) is a comprehensive software platform designed for Synology NAS (Network Attached Storage) devices. It serves as the operating system for these devices, providing a wide range of features and functionalities.

The primary use case of Synology DSM is to centralize and manage data storage for organizations. It allows businesses to store, access, and share files securely across multiple devices and platforms. With its intuitive user interface, DSM simplifies the management of data, making it easy to create shared folders, set access permissions, and monitor storage usage.

One of the most valuable functionalities of Synology DSM is its robust data protection capabilities. It offers various RAID configurations, including SHR (Synology Hybrid RAID), which ensures data redundancy and safeguards against drive failures. DSM also supports advanced backup and disaster recovery solutions, such as Snapshot Replication and Hyper Backup, enabling organizations to protect their critical data effectively.

Furthermore, Synology DSM provides a wide range of productivity and collaboration tools. It offers applications like Synology Drive, which allows seamless file synchronization across devices, and Synology Office, a web-based suite for document editing and collaboration. DSM also supports various third-party applications, including popular cloud services like Dropbox and Google Drive, enabling organizations to integrate their existing workflows seamlessly.

Synology

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Synology DSM

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Synology DSM

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Synology DSM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Synology DSM report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.