Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Glue vs Informatica PowerCenter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Glue
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (1st)
Informatica PowerCenter
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (2nd), Data Visualization (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Ajaykumar Myana - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management
We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure. This allowed us to focus on the code and application logic without concerns about scaling, CPU management, or handling fluctuations in flow. The serverless nature of Glue jobs relieved us from these infrastructure-related worries.
Lars Borchers - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and reliable product that provides a variety of features for data integration
The solution is not for newcomers. It has an old touch. The solution must improve the integration with new services. It was part of the program at Informatica when they moved to their cloud platform. It is integrated. However, from an on-premise perspective, we need to buy licenses for PowerExchange. If we want a native driver to access a special service, we need to extend our license to those services. It is expensive. I don't like that it's not all included in the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"The AWS Glue Data Catalog provides metadata management and schema discovery. AWS Glue simplifies data transformation with automatic schema detection, incremental data updates, and integration with other AWS services."
"AWS Glue's best features are scalability and cloud-based features."
"AWS Glue is a good solution for developers, they have the ability to write code in different languages and other software."
"Glue is a NoSQL-based data ETL tool that has some advantages over IIS and ISAs."
"You do not need many frameworks to run Glue."
"The key role for Glue is that it hosts our metadata before rolling out our actual data. This is the major advantage of using this solution and our clients client have been very satisfied with it."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is its ease of use and good documentation. Additionally, we can do all the transformations that we need."
"The performance and design of Informatica have been very valuable. I find the performance faster than, say, Oracle Data Integrator or DataStage."
"The setup is straightforward."
"It provides monitoring and we can therefore be aware of what is happening when we are handling jobs."
"Informatica PowerCenter has good user feedback. The developers can easily make mappings in the solution."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring tools and the reporting manager."
"Once you have learned Informatica, it is very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the new Data Lake feature, which provides the basic capabilities needed."
"It's a complete package, which is why we use this solution."
 

Cons

"AWS Glue's error handling is difficult."
"The start-up time is really high right now. For instance, when you start up a new job, you have to wait for five or eight minutes before it starts. If the start-up time is reduced to one or two minutes, it will be great. It will be better to have a direct linkage to Redshift in AWS. If we can use data catalogs from Redshift, it will be so easy to create some data catalogs. Currently, we can only use data catalogs from S3."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."
"While working on AWS Glue, I could not find any training material for it."
"Setting up pipelines is challenging, especially with version control and testing requirements."
"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."
"The solution could have better documentation on basic steps or blocks that specify what to do."
"We had stability issues, mostly with JVM size."
"I would like to see it be able to import data from NoSQL."
"There is a need to buy a separate license if one wishes to connect with some kind of SAP system, such as SalesForce."
"I would like to see an improvement in the digital adoption."
"The solution's commercial cost is very high. Other open-source tools can do the tool's functions for free. The world is moving to the cloud, but the solution hasn't updated its drivers. I presume that its downfall will start soon. The tool is trying to cross-sell or upsell without helping customers derive benefits from the existing products. They have multiple tools and licenses. It is better to bring the smaller tools in one umbrella."
"The only problem with this product is the level of complexity with the number of levels of transformation that you have to go through."
"While Informatica is great for data-integration, it does not have any analytics features. Thus, organizations have to always look for another product for their BI needs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is good in terms of the financial planning of the company, and it is a good way to estimate the cost. It is also simple for our clients. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools in the market for ETL processes because of the fact that you pay as you use, which separates it from other big tools such as PowerCenter, Pentaho Data Integration, and Talend."
"AWS Glue is a high-priced solution that bills the client $150,000 to $250,000 annually."
"AWS Glue uses a pay-as-you-go approach which is helpful. The price of the overall solution is low and is a great advantage."
"I rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."
"It is an expensive product. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."
"I rate the tool an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is expensive."
"I rate pricing an eight out of ten."
"AWS Glue is a paid service that doesn't come under the free trial of AWS."
"The licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"Licensing costs are excessive and pose an obstacle to someone who lacks familiarity with the solution and wishes to have a proper understanding of it."
"I am not sure about the most recent price, but I think it should be $100,000 or more."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"It's much more expensive, almost three times more expensive than most other solutions."
"We are using an annual license for Informatica PowerCenter."
"Our client has purchased the license, and we are using it."
"The price could be better. It's very expensive. On a scale from one to five, I would give Informatica PowerCenter's price a one."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user90069 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2014
Informatica PowerCenter vs. Microsoft SSIS - each technology has its advantages but also have similarities
Technology has made it easier for businesses to organize and manipulate data to get a clearer picture of what’s going on with their business. Notably, ETL tools have made managing huge amounts of data significantly easier and faster, boosting many organizations’ business intelligence operations…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?
AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?
We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...
What are the most common use cases for AWS Glue?
AWS Glue's main use case is for allowing users to discover, prepare, move, and integrate data from multiple sources. The product lets you use this data for analytics, application development, or ma...
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?
Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...
Which is better - SSIS or Informatica PowerCenter?
SSIS PowerPack is a group of drag and drop connectors for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, commonly called SSIS. The collection helps organizations boost productivity with code-free compo...
Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?
Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...
 

Also Known As

No data available
PowerCenter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, LexisNexis, Rabobank
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Glue vs. Informatica PowerCenter and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.