AWS Secrets Manager vs Bitwarden comparison

"AWS Secrets Manager is used for storing secret information that has to be a secret from your customer and your employees."

"Integrating with other services was straightforward, especially within the AWS environment."

"The API is fine and works well."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Secrets Manager is the ability to keep data secret and assign access permissions to people to grant or restrict access."

"The solution is very scalable."

"The most valuable feature is usability, as it is quite user-friendly."

"The product is easy to use and is inexpensive."

"The most valuable feature is security."

"Having all the passwords in one place is helpful."

"In our organization, we use Bitwarden for managing product credentials. Bitwarden's collection feature enables us to securely create and store credentials, and we can easily provide team members with access to the relevant collections."

"The product has a very friendly community."

"I've found something else that is extremely valuable. Bitwarden refers to it as "emergency access". It's essentially a digital legacy where you can assign approved users who can request access. If you don't decline within a certain timeframe, they can access it in case you're incapacitated or deceased. When I last checked, only a few services offered this feature. Bitwarden had the simplest and best implementation."

"Its integration capabilities and versatility, like the ability to securely save passwords and other critical information, make it incredibly useful."

"The customer service and support are good. The technician is on time and the follow-up is amazing."

"It is open source and the premium package is reasonable."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"An area for improvement in AWS Secrets Manager could be expanding integration options beyond AWS services."

"AWS Secrets Manager could support hybrid infrastructure."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"There is room for improvement in terms of integrating with certain other platforms."

"We occasionally have problems with rate limits, although that is a problem more generally with AWS."

"If you add one more layer of security to AWS Secrets Manager, even the programmer will not be able to see the secrets."

"It would be good if the AWS Secrets Manager were more customizable."

"The product could be cheaper."

"The product must be a bit more unified and refined."

"The solution should be made more secure as it has the banking sector and assets saved."

"I often use another password manager as well to keep my passwords separate, ensuring redundancy. But one simple thing Bitwarden could improve is providing an option to duplicate credentials. Often, you're creating many sets of credentials for the same thing. If they all have the same information, notes, login, collection, and naming - all you're changing is the password. The ability to duplicate credential records quickly would be a big win. It doesn't do that right now."

"It would be ideal if the application could be seamlessly integrated into our open-source software, especially for the purpose of enabling straightforward logging."

"I would like to log in with a master account using a passkey, that would be easy."

"Enhancing the tool by including additional security variables would be a valuable improvement."

"We purchase a monthly license for the product."

"I don't believe there is a license cost for the solution."

"The cost is somewhat high."

"The solution is expensive."

"We've observed that AWS Secrets Manager pricing is based on a per-secret-per-month model. As a result, we prefer to divide our secrets into individual pieces to increase security and grant specific access permissions to certain secrets, systems, or individuals. However, this approach results in higher costs. Therefore, we have been exploring ways to combine our secrets into groups to reduce expenses and simplify management. Nonetheless, we acknowledge that this issue may not be related to the secret manager's functionality."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The product is not costly. I pay $10 per month."

"It is an open-source tool."

"In our region, it comes at an affordable price."

"I use a free version and it works well for me."