Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Trusted Advisor vs CloudCheckr comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Users quickly achieved ROI with IBM Turbonomic by optimizing resources, reducing costs, and improving performance and efficiency.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.8
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is praised for prompt, knowledgeable support and efficient issue resolution, maintaining high overall satisfaction.
Sentiment score
8.0
AWS Trusted Advisor is praised for excellent customer support, focusing on needs and prevention, despite additional cost.
Sentiment score
7.4
CloudCheckr's customer service is generally praised but sometimes requires account representative intervention for in-depth assistance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM Turbonomic scales effectively, managing large environments and thousands of virtual machines with flexible licensing and strong support.
Sentiment score
8.2
AWS Trusted Advisor is scalable, widely used for compliance, and ideal for large organizations, particularly benefiting security teams.
No sentiment score available
Trusted Advisor is extremely scalable, making it ideal for large businesses, especially those requiring government or compliance-based applications.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Turbonomic is highly stable, with minor issues quickly resolved, maintaining strong performance and reliable recovery from disruptions.
Sentiment score
8.6
AWS Trusted Advisor is highly stable and reliable, with no reported issues or downtime, ensuring consistent operational performance.
Sentiment score
8.2
CloudCheckr is praised for its stability and reliability despite minor performance issues, making it a trusted cloud optimization tool.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Turbonomic needs an updated user interface, enhanced reporting, better documentation, and improved integration with third-party tools.
AWS Trusted Advisor needs improved automation, lower costs, expanded cloud support, AI integration, and enhanced metrics and security rules.
Integrating AI features that not only provide recommendations yet also implement them on behalf of the user would enhance the product.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, cost-effective pricing, with significant savings over additional VMware hosts; negotiate for tailored deals.
AWS Trusted Advisor offers free basic features, with comprehensive plans up to $15,000 monthly, pricing more suitable for larger companies.
Trusted Advisor offers various packages, with the most comprehensive costing $15,000 per month.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency through automation, resource optimization, workload management, integration, and efficient cost-performance balance.
AWS Trusted Advisor optimizes costs, improves security, and offers user-friendly monitoring with packages for various company sizes.
It is especially beneficial for larger companies, as the tool provides a comprehensive view of account security, open ports, buckets, and offers recommendations for protection.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Turbonomic
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Management
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st), AIOps (5th)
AWS Trusted Advisor
Ranking in Cloud Management
21st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CloudCheckr
Ranking in Cloud Management
29th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Cost Management (10th), Managed Cloud Services (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 6.3%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Trusted Advisor is 1.1%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management
 

Featured Reviews

SubashSubbiah - PeerSpot reviewer
It can tell us where performance is lagging on the hardware layer, but the reporting on the application layer is lacking
The automation area could be improved, and the generic reports are poor. We want more details in the analysis report from the application layer. The reports from the infrastructure layer are satisfactory, but Turbonomic won't provide much information if we dig down further than the application layer. I would like them to add some apps for physical device load resourcing and physical-to-virtual calculation. It gives excellent recommendations for the virtual layer but doesn't have the capabilities for physical-to-virtual analysis. Automated deployment is something else they could add. Some built-in automation features are helpful, but we aren't effectively using a few. We want a few more automated features, like autoscaling and automatic performance optimization testing would be useful.
Labhesh Hase - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and easy-to-use product that provides excellent cost optimization features and technical support
The cost optimization features are valuable. The product is easy to use. We can watch each metric and take corrective actions. It keeps fetching environmental information all the time. If someone makes any changes, we get updates from the tool. Even a person who does not have any idea of AWS can use the product.
Nigel Mullings - PeerSpot reviewer
Beneficial granular reporting, highly stable, and excellent support
I have worked in the cost-management tools from many cloud providers, such as Amazon AWS, Google Cloud Services, and Azure. CloudCheckr CMx High Security has a lot more detail than the native cloud service cost-management tools. If you want an enterprise-grade solution, CloudCheckr CMx High Security would be a good fit. If you want something simple, out of the box, then you can use the cloud service's native tools.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Healthcare Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is...
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting...
What do you like most about AWS Trusted Advisor?
The Security Advisor is the most valuable feature. It instantly informs you about any system misconfigurations, and t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Trusted Advisor?
As long as you have a corporate AWS account, which most companies do. Personal accounts wouldn't have it, but any cor...
What needs improvement with AWS Trusted Advisor?
Maybe adding more security rules would be great. It comes with around 20-25 baseline rules. If you want more, like 30...
What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?
The recommendation section is pretty helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?
The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.
What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?
We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security comp...
 

Also Known As

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
No data available
CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Trusted Advisor vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.