Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS WAF vs FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
FortiWeb Web Application Fi...
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of AWS WAF is 13.7%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2024
A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks
We use AWS WAF to protect our application from different kinds of attacks. We use AWS WAF for retail customers Our retail application is vulnerable to a lot of bot attacks. AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry. The…
Nitith Unarat - PeerSpot reviewer
May 13, 2024
Identifies potential DDoS attacks and suspicious domain activity
My company is a Fortinet partner and specializes in FortiWeb. We often compete against cloud-native solutions like Azure Application Gateway WAF. We typically conduct proof-of-concept tests for potential clients. They are usually looking for API protection and bot mitigation, which FortiWeb excels…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules."
"What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
"The interface is good."
"It is a one-click WAF with no effort needed."
"The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
"The platform's stability is good."
"The tool secures our critical applications, especially the mobile money application, which is often targeted by attacks. The solution provides rapid protection and has proven reliable against various threats."
"The product is easy to configure."
"The initial setup was easy since it was possible to get remote support for the product."
"We use it to secure VMs and applications. It protects against DDoS attacks. It's very user-friendly."
"It is good for web tracking applications."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall blocks attacks from application layers and provides protection."
"The solution's technical support is good."
 

Cons

"The setup is complicated."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"In a future release I would like to see automation. There's no interaction between the applications and that makes it tedious. We have to do the preparation all over again for each of our other applications."
"They should make the implementation process faster."
"The cost management has room for improvement."
"For uniformity, AWS has a well-accepted framework. However, it'll be better for us if we could have some more documented guidelines on how the specific business should be structured and the roles that the cloud recommends."
"The product must provide more features."
"One area for improvement in AWS WAF could be the limitation on the number of rules, particularly those from third-party sources, within the free tier."
"The technical support team is bad."
"The product is complicated to set up."
"I don't see any issues with the tool apart from the pricing aspect of the product. The price of the product is an area where improvements are required."
"We have encountered issues with webhooks and management of FortiWeb Web Application Firewall's on-premise version."
"The tool's price and performance are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"The documentation is poor."
"The price is a little higher than the competitors."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall needs to improve its performance."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"The price of AWS WAF is expensive if you do not know how to manage your software up or down. I price of the solution is average amongst the other competitors but it would be better if it was less expensive."
"There are no separate licensing costs we pay for since it is included in the plan we purchase."
"I would rate AWS WAF's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The product is moderately priced."
"The price is average."
"For Kubernetes microservices, AWS is more expensive compared to OCI. AWS costs approximately 70 cents per hour, while OCI is 50% cheaper."
"The price of AWS WAF is reasonable, it is not expensive and it is not cheap."
"The licensing cost of the product is pretty high compared to other OEMs in the market."
"The tool is really expensive."
"The product provides very good prices to customers. The price is set well and offers great value for money."
"It is a cheap solution."
"FortiWeb WAF is priced well for customers compared to other vendors' solutions."
"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall's pricing is suited for small or medium organizations."
"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."
"It is a cost-effective product. If you need an extra module in the product, there will be an extra cost in addition to the licensing fee."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are the limitations of AWS WAF vs alternative WAFs?
Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud WAF is t...
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...
What do you like most about AWS WAF?
The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system.
What do you like most about FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)?
The most valuable features of the solution are SD-WAN, filtration, web filter, application filter, and IPS.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)?
The product provides very good prices to customers. The price is set well and offers great value for money.
What needs improvement with FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)?
Regarding areas for improvement, the documentation needs work. We had issues with a customer because the documentation didn't clearly show which devices can connect with FortiWeb WAF, leading to mi...
 

Also Known As

AWS Web Application Firewall
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.