Azure Private Link vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0, while Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 0.2% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Azure Private Link

Read 1 Azure Private Link review

81 Views
53 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 57 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

3,925 Views
2,533 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Azure Private Link

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 8, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Azure Private Link are solutions competing in the application connectivity and integration space. While MuleSoft excels in providing comprehensive connectivity and API management, Azure Private Link takes the lead in secure connectivity due to its robust security features and seamless integration with Azure services.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides comprehensive API management, facilitating connectivity across diverse applications. It offers extensive integration capabilities suitable for complex enterprise environments. MuleSoft also includes tools for lifecycle management. Azure Private Link provides secure, scalable access to Azure services, focusing on private connectivity to Azure resources. It prioritizes cybersecurity and ensures seamless integration within Azure while supporting scalable access points for enhanced security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform ensures straightforward deployment for API integrations with supportive service frameworks to assist implementation. Azure Private Link benefits from its native Azure integration, making it simpler for Azure-focused operations. MuleSoft offers API-centric support, whereas Azure emphasizes service compatibility and secure connections within its ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform typically involves higher upfront costs but could deliver substantial ROI for businesses leveraging its expansive API management capabilities. Azure Private Link offers cost-effective Azure service access, utilizing existing Azure infrastructure to reduce expenses and improve ROI through decreased security overhead and increased operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Private Link

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

16th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (9th), Cloud Data Integration (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Private Link is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 12.0%, down from 16.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Soumen Dey

Technical Architect at LTIMindtree

It acts as a dedicated VIP channel for communication between two private IP addresses, allowing only restricted users to access it

The setup of Azure Private Link within SQL Server could be made much easier. If there was a simple button for setup, that would be helpful. The process of setting up the private link and connecting the database with the correct naming convention is a complex process. I would recommend to allow access to restricted public access and private endpoint functionality. Currently, it's either public or private, but having the option for both would be beneficial. This allows public users to work through the public channel and vice versa.

Read full review

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Azure Private Link ensures that any kind of transaction or activity on the cloud uses private IPs and is detached from the external world, preventing malicious access."

"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."

"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."

"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."

"The tool’s API management capabilities are excellent."

"The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API."

"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."

"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"The setup of Azure Private Link within SQL Server could be made much easier. If there was a simple button for setup, that would be helpful. The process of setting up the private link and connecting the database with the correct naming convention is a complex process."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

"The tool requires programming language."

"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."

"Information on monitoring could be improved."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Azure Private Link?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Private Link?

The client has hosted all of his data on cloud, whereas we work on-premises. On a specific request from the client we have transitioned to Azure cloud and hence, require Azure Private Link. This cl...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Azure Private Link?

It is highly recommended because it's efficient and easy to use to establish a secure and private route. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2025

Download Azure Private Link product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

January 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Azure Private Link provides private connectivity from a virtual network to Azure platform as a service (PaaS), customer-owned, or Microsoft partner services. It simplifies the network architecture and secures the connection between endpoints in Azure by eliminating data exposure to the public internet.

Microsoft

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.