Azure Site Recovery vs Carbonite Recover comparison

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 22 Azure Site Recovery reviews

1,229 Views
936 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Carbonite Recover

Read 1 Carbonite Recover review

83 Views
61 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

Carbonite Recover

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Carbonite Recover based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 825,399 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (2nd)

Carbonite Recover

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (25th)

Featured Reviews

Mike Douthitt

Senior System Administrator at Douthitt.net

Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time

Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Rias_Majeed

CTO at Exceed NetSec Computer Trd LLC

Allows you to test and schedule recovery tasks for multiple sites

The main weakness of Carbonite Recover is the fallback process, which can be time-consuming. However, the failover process works well when done properly. Similar to other software programs, there was a technical issue involving duplicates and small glitches. Over time, Carbonite recovery has improved. When I started working with Cyber, we had to double-check everything, and although it was challenging, the downtime wasn't extensive—one incident in a year, for example. Restoring data with Carbonite Recover can take time, mainly because the backup process occurs in real time. The main concern is the duration needed to restore data to the primary environment, which can be lengthy. However, once the failover is complete, there are no further issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."

"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."

"The setup is quite easy, just requiring the creation of a vault."

"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."

"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."

"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."

"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."

"Azure Site Recovery is obviously a time-saving solution, and I can write PowerShell scripts to automate failover on or off processes."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"We confirm the server failure before initiating recovery. Once started, this process takes half an hour to an hour, though it can be as fast as 15 minutes. After bringing up the server, we test connectivity to ensure everything is operational."

Cons

"Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options. Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services."

"The immutable backup could be better."

"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."

"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."

"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."

"The tool should improve synchronization."

"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."

"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"The main weakness of Carbonite Recover is the fallback process, which can be time-consuming. However, the failover process works well when done properly. Similar to other software programs, there was a technical issue involving duplicates and small glitches."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have a license to pay."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

Its bit costly for long term use

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options. Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services. Integrating these services would make the solution more a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Recover?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Carbonite Recover?

Carbonite Recover is an effective tool for testing and scheduling recovery tasks for multiple sites, whether they have primary servers or virtual machines. You can schedule jobs for recovery at the...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Carbonite Recover?

Carbonite Recover is a downtime reduction solution that minimizes the time employees cannot work. Carbonite Recover can accurately measure how much potential productivity or revenue is saved per ho...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 19% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 17% of the time

Zerto vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 17% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

VMware Live Recovery vs Carbonite Recover

Compared 100% of the time

More Carbonite Recover Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

December 2024

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

December 2024

Download Carbonite Recover product report

Learn More

Microsoft

OpenText

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Carbonite Recover securely replicates critical systems from your primary environment to the Carbonite cloud. This ensures that an up-to-date secondary copy is available for failover at any moment, minimizing downtime as well as costs. You pay for what you use, when you use it - and not for idle resources.

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.