Azure Site Recovery vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD comparison

Microsoft and Precisely are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Precisely users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 23 Azure Site Recovery reviews

1,089 Views
801 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Read 2 Precisely Assure QuickEDD reviews

495 Views
336 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Precisely Assure QuickEDD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (2nd)

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (19th)

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

The time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes

First of all, we initially faced a challenge as Azure Site Recovery was not supporting shared disk options on SQL clusters with VMs, which are important for a Windows cluster mode. Additionally, the setup is quite easy, only requiring the creation of a vault. Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

Read full review

reviewer2325741

Director of Information Technology at a construction company with 1-10 employees

Trustworthy and provides good availability

Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over. It could be more of a knowledge transfer situation that didn't happen, but we didn't know if it was easy to use. Precisely Assure QuickEDD is deployed on the cloud in our organization. The implementation of QLED helped us with our recovery time objective and was a seamless transition. In order to utilize the product to its fullest potential, users should be knowledgeable of what it offers. They should also form a relationship with the person who is their representative. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."

"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."

"You can create automation to move workloads and redirect traffic to another region."

"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."

"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."

"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."

"Azure Site Recovery is obviously a time-saving solution, and I can write PowerShell scripts to automate failover on or off processes."

"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"Synchronous applications are valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."

Cons

"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."

"The tool should improve synchronization."

"Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options. Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services."

"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."

"we lack a straightforward method to automate the restart of services, which can be quite time-consuming."

"Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options."

"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."

"There should be more interactive dashboards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"They have a license to pay."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"It is expensive. The cost varies based on your requirements. If you want to manage it, there is an extra cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

The pricing of Azure Site Recovery is around a four out of ten, being somewhat cost-effective. Microsoft frequently restructures their pricing, causing us to adjust packages and subscriptions, whic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages. The support help desk needs to improve escalation procedures. Azure ( /products...

See all answers

What do you like most about Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

We used Precisely Assure QuickEDD for our backups.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 19% of the time

Zerto vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Rubrik vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 100% of the time

More Precisely Assure QuickEDD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

April 2025

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

April 2025

Download Precisely Assure QuickEDD product report

Also Known As

No data available

Syncsort Assure QuickEDD, Syncsort Quick-EDD/HA, Quick-EDD/HA

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Microsoft

Protecting critical IBM i applications from downtime and guarding against data loss with simple, scalable, full-featured high availability and disaster recovery products

Precisely

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Toyota Material Handling Australia, Westpac Pacific Banking, Symphony Health, Wimbledon, OCBC Bank

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

March 2025

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.