Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Balbix BreachControl vs Brinqa comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Balbix BreachControl
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
62nd
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (15th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (22nd)
Brinqa
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
56th
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
18th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (48th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (49th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Balbix BreachControl is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Brinqa is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Brinqa0.5%
Balbix BreachControl0.3%
Other99.2%
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Balbix BreachControl?
Leave a review
RB
Cybersecurity Director at RB Consultancy
Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs
I would give the easiness of the initial setup a seven out of ten. It can be a bit complex. Some connections are straightforward, but some take a long time. Deploying Brinqa took time, as it was done in phases. Initially, it took about six months before we started getting valuable data from it. Then, it expanded from there. The deployment began with a product demo and contract negotiation. We connected some data sources to Brinqa's cloud service, which was straightforward. We used the default risk ranking algorithm but faced issues with the dashboards, so we customized them to fit our organization's needs over a few years. We depended a lot on Brinqa for the deployment. We had some internal resources, but they lacked the needed skills, so it took time to train our two-man team. Initially, it required one person for maintenance, and they spent most of their time on it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
882,744 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Retailer
15%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

BreachControl
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cavium
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Tenable, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: January 2026.
882,744 professionals have used our research since 2012.