Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Barracuda Message Archiver vs KerioConnect comparison

Barracuda Networks and GFI are both solutions in the Email Archiving category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while GFI is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Barracuda Networks holds a 7.3% mindshare in EA, compared to GFI’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 57% of GFI users who would recommend it.
Barracuda Message Archiver
Read 2 Barracuda Message Archiver reviews
  • 234 Views
  • 57 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
KerioConnect
Read 10 KerioConnect reviews
  • 39 Views
  • 25 Comparison Views
57% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Barracuda Message Archiver and KerioConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Email Archiving solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Message Archiver vs. KerioConnect Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Message Archiver vs. KerioConnect
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Message Archiver
Ranking in Email Archiving
4th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
KerioConnect
Ranking in Email Archiving
7th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Email Applications (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Email Archiving category, the mindshare of Barracuda Message Archiver is 7.3%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KerioConnect is 3.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Email Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

SK
Easy to use with helpful email backup and search capabilities, but it needs to support SIEM integration
Integration with ArcSight would be very helpful. The user mailbox management is poor. For example, if I want to restore a complete mailbox then it doesn't keep the structure of the inbox intact. When the emails are restored, they are in a single folder that we have to extract and restructure. At times, the restoration doesn't work properly. It would be difficult to opt-out of the services because it would require the transfer of a lot of data from the cloud to on-premises storage. Technical support should be more available to the Indian market.
Read full review
David Bloomer - PeerSpot reviewer
Lightweight, simple, and robust; easy to maintain and doesn't require a lot of system resources to run
Kerio Connect does as advertised, so there are no real issues with the product itself. It's developed regularly, so there are constant updates. Possibly, the support and development have lessened since they've sold the company, but as far as the product itself is concerned, there isn't anything that I would suggest needs improvement. If I'm being picky, Kerio Connect uses a proprietary, mappy atom for Outlook, and it would be nice if they used a native mappy connection instead, but that's the only additional feature that I would like to see in its next release. If they have native Outlook map integration, that would be great, but other than that, it's got all the functions that I think a mail server should have.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to use."
"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface. It has many security features able to be controlled from one place, such as anti-spam. I have found it very convenient. Additionally, you can analyze log files and share folders which is helpful."
"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."
"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."
"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."
"The solution is easy to maintain, unlike Exchange. It's easy to create multiple domains and back up and restore if needed. It also has good security features like anti-spam and antivirus."
"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."
"It's relatively simple to use."
"KerioConnect has integration with 365. We can use Outlook, which has its client and can be used with Apple devices. It integrates with the App Store and Microsoft Office. It has a smart router. The spam filtering and antivirus are good."
More KerioConnect pros
 

Cons

"It's a little bit more expensive than the others."
"The user mailbox management is poor."
"KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval."
"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"
"KerioConnect is stable as long as you use a strong password."
"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason."
"We are considering switching to Microsoft Exchange. One reason is that it doesn't improve our workflow and doesn't integrate well with Microsoft 365 applications."
"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."
"I would like to see better support from their support team."
"You cannot integrate with other services like Google Docs, Google Assistant, Google Calendar, etc."
More KerioConnect cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are satisfied with the pricing and the service is bundled so there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"They're a little bit more expensive than the others."
"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."
"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."
"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."
"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
78%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Message Archiver?
We use Barracuda Message Archiver to keep a copy of our users' emails, both inbound or outbound. Our goal in using it is that from a compliance perspective, we can provide access to our auditors. I...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Message Archiver?
They're a little bit more expensive than the others.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Barracuda Message Archiver?
It's a little bit more expensive than the others. It's like anything. You got to log in when you want stuff nowadays. Other than that, it's pretty good.
See all answers
What do you like most about KerioConnect?
The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?
KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with KerioConnect?
KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval. In larger organizations, the server's capabilities and the da...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect Logo
Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect
Compared 52% of the time
Zimbra Collaboration vs KerioConnect Logo
Zimbra Collaboration vs KerioConnect
Compared 29% of the time
IceWarp vs KerioConnect Logo
IceWarp vs KerioConnect
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Exchange Online vs KerioConnect Logo
Microsoft Exchange Online vs KerioConnect
Compared 7% of the time
Google Workspace vs KerioConnect Logo
Google Workspace vs KerioConnect
Compared 4% of the time
More KerioConnect Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Email Archiving
March 2025
Barracuda Message Archiver reportDownload Barracuda Message Archiver product report
Buyer's Guide
KerioConnect
March 2025
KerioConnect reportDownload KerioConnect product report
 

Overview

Barracuda Message Archiver is a cloud-integrated message archiving solution that is easy to deploy and manage. It dramatically reduces your email storage requirements while boosting user productivity. And it makes regulatory and e-discovery compliance practically effortless.

With Barracuda Message Archiver, all users can instantly access, search, retrieve, and export archived messages using any device, whether on-site or on the go.

Barracuda Message Archiver integrates with all standards-based email servers, and with cloud email services such as Office 365 and Gmail.

Barracuda Networks

Kerio Connect, a messaging and collaboration solution, meets the needs of small and mid-sized businesses while offering a robust feature lineup. Business users enjoy support for their favorite email client and easy web-based access. Kerio Connect is highly stable—so you can focus on business rather than unexpected downtime and recovery.

GFI
 

Sample Customers

Alfa Romeo, Texas A&M University, Time Warner, Nintendo, Boeing 
Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Message Archiver vs. KerioConnect
March 2025
Free Report: Barracuda Message Archiver vs. KerioConnect
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Message Archiver vs. KerioConnect and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Barracuda Message Archiver vs. KerioConnect report.
See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.