BigFix vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery comparison

The compared HCLSoftware and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. HCLSoftware is ranked #33 in EPP , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 1.3% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #9 in eD , and holds a 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BigFix and OpenText EnCase eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed BigFix vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Report (Updated: January 2020).

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

January 2020

Download the complete report

Helped 889,955 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BigFix	1.3%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	7.2%
CrowdStrike Falcon	6.3%
Other	85.2%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

eDiscovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText EnCase eDiscovery	3.3%
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery	6.8%
kCura Relativity	5.4%
Other	84.5%

eDiscovery

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Anish_Mishra

RPA Developer at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Successfully manage endpoint security and compliance while facing integration challenges

I have not come across any difficulties. I integrated it with ILMT (IBM License Metric Tool). It lets us identify all software being used in my organization with BigFix. It provides input of all types of software being used, including details and information about hardware specifications. I am more involved in software licensing and procurement, so I utilize this tool for procuring more licenses if needed for our company. After integration, we get different dashboards showcasing our IBM infrastructure, highlighting various issues in our environment that we can mitigate. I recommend BigFix to others. I rate BigFix a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Alejandro Stromer

Director Consulting SAP OpenText en Entelgy at DCL Consultores EIM SL

A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup

The solution is scalable. It has three levels. You have the presentation area that can be escalated to the balance sheet. You have the back-end area that can be escalated using higher viability to configure more application servers. Also, the area of storage can be increased. We usually cater to enterprise solutions but have small- and medium-sized customers. It starts with 25 users and goes up to 100s and 1000s.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex is the best tool for endpoint detection, and I have used it to verify hashes or domains to identify malicious activity, trigger playbooks that automate and gather endpoint logs, block malicious processes, and update incident tickets, showcasing end-to-end processes with automation in investigation and reducing the analysis workflow."

"Cortex XDR can integrate the firewalls and determine the tendencies of the attacks. It's a new generation antivirus, with protection endpoints and detection response. It is very easy to use and everybody can operate the solution."

"I've found the solution to be highly scalable for enterprises."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"Cortex covers everything I need. It's a perfect solution. Cortex provides a different level of visibility because it's an extended EDR, allowing you to grab logs from the network and firewalls. Palo Alto invented the concept of the extended EDR or XDR."

"The multi-layered approach to the product gives you confidence that it will stop exploits, ransomware, worms, or viruses from compromising endpoints, essentially providing peace of mind."

"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."

"The stability of this product is very good."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"From a security standpoint, it allows us to make sure that we're not leaving ourselves vulnerable to exploits and things like that. That's the biggest advantage that we see to the product from a security standpoint."

"My company provides support services to a lot of customers and companies, and we have reduced a huge amount of man-effort and the timeline to fix the compliance and security gaps, with an unbroken record of patching newly released Microsoft and third-party patches on up to 80% of 25,000 endpoints within 72 hours of release, which has been a very massive benefit."

"Once you get over the learning curve, it is pretty easy to use."

"It enables us to patch our systems quickly and within expectations and to increase our volume as needed. It has also helped us compress our patch sites. We used to do it monthly but now we do it weekly."

"The older version of the tools that I use also included the connectivity aspect, and the fact that the tool now has it separate from the collection of usage data makes the deployment of these tools much easier."

"We are able to go from patching thousands of machines by twenty to thirty people to one person."

"The use of fast query has been extremely valuable providing insight in real time of the endpoints."

"Using BigFix and the automation we built we've been able to reduce patch time from three hours and 37 minutes on average to less than twenty minutes per server."

More BigFix pros

"Using Encase we are able to implement security and also Forensics."

"The solution is very stable."

"It is a very useful tool; it is worth buying irrespective of price."

"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."

"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."

"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."

"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts, as it allows me to customize the scripts and deploy them as and how I need them, for example to segregate and index files efficiently."

"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery pros

Cons

"In reporting they should have a customizable dashboard due to the fact that C-level people don't like reporting to the IT department. They prefer to have a real-time dashboard. That kind of dashboard needs to have various customizations."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"The product's pricing could be better."

"The solution should force customers to integrate with network traffic to see the full benefits of XDR."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"License management isn't quite as easy as it should be to deal with the licensing. You need to take the server down to import the new licenses which I find to be annoying."

"The setup was very complex."

"We would like to see a different license plan, e.g. to include features from lifecycle with Patch Management, as an example."

"IBM has not focused on the Web Reports capabilities."

"Needs to improve Network Access Protection (NAP) technologies to prevent computers with vulnerabilities from gaining access to networks."

"I would like to see the Self Service section made more user-friendly."

"I self-taught for this online, so the initial setup was a little difficult to pick up at first."

"I would eventually like to see a SaaS offering, a cloud-hosted BigFix instance where we only have to put a relay in our environment."

More BigFix cons

"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."

"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."

"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."

"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."

"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."

"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."

"I suggest that if the mobile phone acquisition is embedded in the Encase law enforcement version, it would be very useful."

"From a customer service standpoint, this is unacceptable."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"The price of the product is not very economical."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"When purchasing, buying with other IBM tools provided us with a very good discount in pricing."

"Compliance, inventory, and licensing are really pricey. They should lower the price. It discourages users from getting onboard."

"The tool's price continues to go up. The cost per endpoint can vary, ranging from approximately 30 to 80 dollars per year. Compared to other products, pricing is in the middle. You need to buy an additional database license, but most users already have it."

"I can estimate the reduced cost of servers maintenance to approximatively $500,000."

"The price of BigFix is better than the solutions. You are able to pay monthly or annually. There are not any hidden costs with BigFix. There is an additional cost for the SQL database."

"The price of the solution is high. There are not any additional fees from the standard license."

"The license is subscription-based."

"Its price is very reasonable."

More BigFix pricing and cost advice

"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."

"EnCase is an affordable solution."

"The product is affordable and user-friendly."

"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

12%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	67

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?

The pricing is pretty good and now follows a subscription model similar to other major software solutions, making it ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BigFix?

I have concerns about BigFix's pricing, which I find to be slightly on the higher side. While it may not be the most ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BigFix?

I have been working at Tech Data for the last 12 plus years.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Tanium vs BigFix

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs BigFix

Compared 3% of the time

NinjaOne vs BigFix

Compared 3% of the time

More BigFix Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 10% of the time

Nuix eDiscovery vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 9% of the time

kCura Relativity vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 9% of the time

Exterro vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

BigFix

April 2026

Download BigFix product report

Buyer's Guide

eDiscovery

April 2026

Download OpenText EnCase eDiscovery product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Tivoli Endpoint Manager

EnCase eDiscovery

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Palo Alto Networks

HCLSoftware

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HCL BigFix is a Unified Endpoint Management and automation platform that reduces risk, cost, and complexity in enterprise IT environments, managing 155M+ endpoints.

BigFix provides centralized management, security, and remediation for diverse IT infrastructures. It integrates infrastructural security, endpoint remediation, and digital employee experience automation. Built on a single-agent architecture, it ensures seamless policy enforcement across on-premises, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments. Organizations benefit by managing nearly 100 operating system variants through a unified platform, ensuring compliance and operational resilience. BigFix supports stringent regulatory requirements, making it suitable for highly regulated industries and public-sector environments.

What are BigFix's most important features?

Patch Management: Deploy patches across multiple OSs efficiently.
Integration: Works with leading vulnerability scanners like Tenable and Rapid7.
Central Console: Provides real-time capabilities and customization via APIs.
Automation & Inventory: Manages desktops and servers, offering detailed reporting.
Multi-Platform Support: Facilitates seamless patch deployment and monitoring.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Cost Reduction: Minimizes labor through automation and intelligent workflows.
Security Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Scalability: Supports large enterprises with expansive endpoint management.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces tool sprawl and simplifies management tasks.

In industries like telecom and finance, BigFix is used for automated patch management, software distribution, and security compliance. Companies leverage it for endpoint management and inventory tracking. It integrates with tools like ILMT to enhance endpoint data collection, aiding compliance and application deployment.

HCLSoftware

eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

OpenText

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation

Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

January 2020

Free Report: BigFix vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Find out what your peers are saying about BigFix vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BigFix vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery report.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.