Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Heimdal Patch and Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th)
Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Patch Management (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Heimdal Patch and Asset Management aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is designed for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and holds a mindshare of 2.8%, down 3.1% compared to last year.
Heimdal Patch and Asset Management, on the other hand, focuses on Patch Management, holds 0.5% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AMBARISH PATKAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized control effectively manages devices while updates require powered-on systems
I use Bitdefender GravityZone EDR for the grooming industry. It is primarily utilized for the office environment The features I find most effective for threat detection include centralized control policy distribution and the control of independent devices, such as printers, laptops, and desktops…
Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have had no issues with the support and consider it to be good, even when it comes to accredited resellers."
"The installation is straightforward."
"We like the dashboard, the console, the reporting. It's very easy to deploy."
"It's easy to deploy."
"The most valuable features are the anti-malware and firewall policies. The runtime scans and execution have been beneficial to our business."
"The nice thing about Bitdefender is that it has modules and layers that you can add as the requirement becomes more sophisticated and dangerous or threatening."
"It is stable."
"The tool alerts about lateral internet movements."
"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
 

Cons

"This solution would be improved if it included antivirus functionality. You currently need to install a plug-in to Outlook for each email to be scanned."
"The installation is not straightforward and should be easier to do."
"The interface could be improved."
"In terms of improvement of the solution, it could have better features. For example, having a firewall within. This way we would only need one solution."
"While the solution is secure, it could have better integration."
"The on-premises setup for Bitdefender sometimes faces issues with connectivity. Management of Windows Defender is a bit easier compared to Bitdefender."
"For many, the problems come mostly when they start tweaking or short-cutting - particularly for patch management."
"If we could directly push the agent to the script, it'll be very good."
"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has a reasonable price."
"There are different packages available that vary in terms of licensing fees."
"The pricing is competitive."
"The price is per license per endpoint. The price is different for everyone, but we find the price is cheap for us."
"There is a fully functional trial that we used and we didn't have any issues."
"We take the subscription. Only we're taking that GravityZone and protection of the environment and the system. We didn't subscribe to the detection response."
"Each endpoint device we purchased came with its own license."
"The licensing cost has been manageable for our small team."
"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
8%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra?
The cost is reasonable, with the license costing approximately six to eight dollars per user.
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra?
When patching devices for updates, if a device is not switched on, it does not provide information dynamically.
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, Bitdefender GravityZone
Thor Foresight Enterprise
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mentor Graphics, Rudersdal Kommune
Brother, Symbion, CPH West
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.