BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs HP Wolf Security comparison

BlackBerry and HP are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while HP is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. BlackBerry holds a 1.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to HP’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of HP users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

2,960 Views
2,664 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

13,108 Views
10,749 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

HP Wolf Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and HP Wolf Security are competing products in the cybersecurity space, focused on protecting organizational digital assets. BlackBerry Cylance may have the edge in pricing and support, while HP Wolf Security is noted for its robust features, making it a preferred choice for those valuing comprehensive protection.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance emphasizes AI-driven threat detection and prevention with a lightweight footprint, ensuring minimal system resource use. Its ability to protect against zero-day threats through advanced machine learning is significant. In contrast, HP Wolf Security offers extensive endpoint security and focuses on hardware-based protection, providing a unique defense layer. Additionally, HP is recognized for its advanced threat containment and monitoring capabilities, making it well-suited for environments requiring thorough security measures.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could enhance its features by incorporating more comprehensive threat containment capabilities. Additionally, improving its hardware-based protection levels might make it more competitive. Moreover, expanding its integration capabilities with other security solutions could provide added value. HP Wolf Security can improve by simplifying its initial setup to accommodate a broader range of users. Additionally, reducing its resource intensity could appeal to businesses with limited IT resources. Enhancements in its AI-driven threat detection might also strengthen its offering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance offers straightforward deployment with cloud-managed solutions backed by commendable customer service. Its simplicity benefits resource-limited environments. Conversely, HP Wolf Security provides advanced setup options requiring more initial configuration. However, it is supported by responsive customer service, appealing to users with complex needs. BlackBerry's ease of deployment is a notable advantage, while HP's adaptability is attractive for enterprises with diverse security requirements.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is praised for cost-effective implementation with a favorable ROI due to its efficient protection capabilities. It provides a budget-friendly solution for businesses looking to optimize costs. On the other hand, HP Wolf Security often incurs higher setup costs, yet the comprehensive security features justify the investment for businesses prioritizing extensive protection. While BlackBerry offers a more economical choice, HP's enhanced security infrastructure delivers value for enterprises willing to invest in robust protection systems.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,346 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 5.4%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HP Wolf Security	5.4%
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.3%
Other	93.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very quick at easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and the server."

"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."

"What's most valuable in CylancePROTECT is the optics feature. I also like its easy-to-use and user-friendly dashboard and monitoring system."

"We chose the solution because it doesn't have daily updates, which is important for us in healthcare IT, where network usage and connectivity to hospitals matter."

"I've found the AI engine in CylancePROTECT to be particularly effective for technology and in preventing unknown threats."

"CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices."

"Very easy to deploy. It can be done one by one or deployed by customizing an MSI file for GPO push."

"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

Cons

"Enhancing the product's detection rates and streamlining the user interface for easier management in daily operations would be beneficial improvements."

"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."

"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."

"It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated."

"rom my experience interacting with the primary or the central administrative console, it's quite complex. You would need a fair bit of technical experience to set it up, implement and maintain it. That would be one area for improvement."

"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."

"We would like to see secure integration and multi-factor authentication to be able to access the administration dashboard."

"It is hard to manage."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

More HP Wolf Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution provides me with competitive pricing."

"Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc."

"The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is around the same as most EDRs but slightly behind some of the major ones."

"This cost of the license is approximately $5 USD monthly per user."

"Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is reasonable."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 2% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 12% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 10% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

January 2026

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

January 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

Bromium vSentry

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.

What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Valspar

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security

December 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. HP Wolf Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.