Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Nyotron PARANOID comparison

BlackBerry and Nyotron are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nyotron is ranked #49 with an average rating of 9.0. BlackBerry holds a 1.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Nyotron’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nyotron users who would recommend it.
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...
Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews
  • 4,410 Views
  • 3,293 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Nyotron PARANOID
Read 2 Nyotron PARANOID reviews
  • 296 Views
  • 139 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

BlackBerry Cylance and Nyotron PARANOID compete in the cybersecurity category. BlackBerry Cylance leads in terms of pricing and support, while Nyotron PARANOID stands out with its features, appealing to users valuing advanced security despite higher costs.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance's AI-driven threat detection and prevention integrates smoothly with systems, offering robust protection. Its ability to operate without frequent updates is a distinct advantage. Nyotron PARANOID provides effective endpoint security, leveraging proactive threat handling to enhance protection, which users find innovative.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could improve reporting tools and offer more flexible configurations. Users desire better customization options to meet diverse needs. Nyotron PARANOID needs a simplified setup process, as initial complexity impacts user experience. Users suggest enhancements in setup intuitiveness for better onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance ensures swift deployment, supporting a broad range of systems effectively. It offers reliable customer service, catering to technical needs. Nyotron PARANOID's deployment process is more complex but is offset by responsive customer service, providing tailored support, enhancing the user experience.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance offers a cost-effective solution with favorable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious users. Nyotron PARANOID, though involving higher initial costs, presents a strong ROI through comprehensive security, attracting users prioritizing long-term protection over immediate cost savings.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Nyotron PARANOID Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Nyotron PARANOID
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nyotron PARANOID
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
49th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nyotron PARANOID is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry - PeerSpot reviewer
Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.
Read full review
Abel Browarnik - PeerSpot reviewer
A cost-effective security solution for endpoint protection
The initial setup is complex. It is rare to see an effective endpoint protection system that does not require some effort. It is neither on the cloud nor on-premises. You deploy it on every endpoint or server, irrespective of perimeter. You must use a deployment tool unless you prefer to do it manually on every endpoint or server. We used an automation tool to deploy it. Since we had MSI with us. We had to verify that everything worked, but it didn't take more than two weeks for 1000 endpoints.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."
"CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices."
"The most valuable features are script blocking and macros within Word documents for stopping unwanted applications from running in the background."
"We chose the solution because it doesn't have daily updates, which is important for us in healthcare IT, where network usage and connectivity to hospitals matter."
"It secures different entry points into the network."
"It does a good job of protecting us."
"Endpoints are protected in real-time without the need of a centralized server."
"The non-daily requirement to update signatures is the most valuable feature. From a functional point of view, it is pretty spot on. For instance, we compared an algorithm from five years ago to today's algorithm, and it was 98% accurate. It has the ability to detect and mitigate. In the industrial environment that we work in, there's what we call OT versus IT. You are IT Central, but this is OT. Generally, we don't have the same level of skillset as IT individuals or IT professionals have. This particular product doesn't require you to be a computer scientist to be able to understand its proprietary algorithm and to be able to deploy, use, and work within it. It integrates well with a robust SIEM or SOAR solution, and it plays nice with others. We use other detection solutions like CyberX or site provision with Cisco, and it plays nice. That's one of the things we really liked about it."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros
"Nyotron protects your users and does not acquire any threat intelligence."
"First of all, it does the job. It prevents harm to the operating system. Also, the visibility it gives to the user and to the administrator is very good."
 

Cons

"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."
"I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable."
"The solution needs better dashboards that are easier to use."
"It could have integration with industrial base HMIS or Human Machine Interfaces Solutions. This is the industrial environment where you have a control center for all the automation that's happening, whether it is oil, gas, or chemical manufacturing. They often have to set up a computer at the back and watch the other stuff to get alerts. In these autonomous or on-premises environments, they often don't have access to email readily. Integration with other industrial solutions, such as HMIS, will allow them to communicate and get an alert that something has been found. This way, they can react to it sooner than having somebody watch the screen and keep checking the screen. Rockwell has its own suite. Similarly, Honeywell has its own suite. There's also an independent HMI/historian solution provider out there called VTSCADA. We actually get asked if we can get it to show up on a screen, which is difficult. Getting those alerts to work within an industrial environment would be a huge plus."
"It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."
"The stability could be improved."
"​Work on the math model. We are catching a lot of false positives, which gets to be a pain at the start of a deployment."
"The price for this EPP platform is expensive and could be improved."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons
"The solution should be available on Linux and other platforms, including mobile platforms such as Android and iOS."
"The main feature that is missing is to have the same solution on servers. Currently it's only protecting the client side, not the server. If they would add the server in the same solution, that would be great."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
"CylancePROTECT is an affordable solution."
"CylancePROTECT's pricing is reasonable, at about €18 per user, per year."
"We went through a third party initially to do the renewal, but we won't be renewing, we will move on to something else."
"I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is."
"The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market."
"The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."
"The solution provides me with competitive pricing."
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?
It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?
The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immedi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Nyotron PARANOID?
Nyotron protects your users and does not acquire any threat intelligence.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nyotron PARANOID?
Users were willing to pay because of the peace of mind that comes with the solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nyotron PARANOID?
There was an initial problem, we had to run the system in detection mode rather than prevention mode. The solution should be available on Linux and other platforms, including mobile platforms such ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 22% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 17% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 5% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 5% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
Compared 5% of the time
More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
December 2024
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reportDownload BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
November 2024
Nyotron PARANOID reportDownload Nyotron PARANOID product report
 

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect
No data available
 

Learn More

BlackBerry
Video not available
Nyotron
 

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance provides endpoint security, threat protection, and antivirus capabilities, using AI and machine learning for protection against malware and ransomware on desktops, servers, and virtual machines worldwide. Its AI-driven threat detection operates even with limited internet, facilitating effective threat management.

BlackBerry Cylance's centralized dashboard simplifies threat management and vulnerability protection for organizations globally. The platform combines AI and machine learning to deliver superior zero-day threat protection and minimize CPU usage, offering stable and accurate threat detection without frequent updates. It includes tools like CylanceOPTICS and CylancePERSONA for enhanced user behavior monitoring and adopts a proactive approach that effectively manages threats at various lifecycle stages. Renowned for stability and performance, it efficiently prevents unauthorized applications while maintaining system productivity.

What are the main features of BlackBerry Cylance?
  • Minimal CPU Usage: Efficiently operates without taxing computer resources.
  • AI and Machine Learning: Advanced technology for zero-day threat protection.
  • Lightweight Design: Functions without constant updates for simplified usage.
  • Centralized Management: Offers a user-friendly, intuitive dashboard.
  • CylanceOPTICS and PERSONA: Tools for in-depth user behavior analysis.
What are key benefits to look for in user reviews?
  • Effective Malware Detection: Recognized accuracy in identifying security threats.
  • Proactive Threat Mitigation: Actively detects and manages threats.
  • Stability and Performance: Consistent protection without hampering system performance.
  • Reduced Unauthorized Access: Limits unpermitted application activity.

In the professional sector, BlackBerry Cylance is leveraged to protect crucial infrastructure through a robust approach accommodating environments with limited connectivity. Its widespread deployment in industries, including healthcare and finance, is attributed to its ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. However, enhancements in reporting, pricing structures, and technical support are avenues for development, reflecting user feedback for improving detection rates and overall dashboard usability.

PARANOID is a game-changing endpoint protection solution that works seamlessly with your existing endpoint security solutions to create an almost impenetrable defense against even the most sophisticated attacks. Acting as the last line of defense – after threats bypass all perimeter and endpoint security layers – PARANOID protects your data from deletion, exfiltration, encryption, sabotage and more.

Delivering the first-ever OS-Centric Positive Security, PARANOID distinguishes between legitimate activities carried out by a program or user and threatening activities carried out by attacks.

 

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
El Al Airlines
Buyer's Guide
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Nyotron PARANOID
December 2024
Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Nyotron PARANOID
Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Nyotron PARANOID and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Nyotron PARANOID report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.