BlazeMeter vs Functionize comparison

Perforce and Functionize are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Functionize is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0. Perforce holds a 0.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to Functionize’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Functionize users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,782 Views
335 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Functionize

Read 1 Functionize review

1,012 Views
1,012 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Functionize

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and Functionize based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (10th), Load Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Functionize

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Functionize is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

reviewer2541093

QA Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides efficient test automation for web applications and has good technical support services

The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process. Vision AI enhances image recognition capabilities, improving the accuracy and efficiency of visual testing. The audit trail feature helps track changes and maintain compliance, which is particularly important in regulated industries. Smart fix automatically resolves issues, reducing manual intervention, while the self-healing feature ensures that test cases remain accurate and functional, even when system changes occur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The on-the-fly test data improved our testing productivity a lot. The new test data features changed how we test the applications because there are different things we can do. We can use mock data or real data. We can also build data based on different formats."

"In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally."

"The stability is good."

"It's a great platform because it's a SaaS solution, but it also builds the on-premises hosting solutions, so we have implemented a hybrid approach. BlazeMeter sets us up for our traditional hosting platforms and application stack as well as the modern cloud-based or SaaS-based application technologies."

"BlazeMeter's most valuable feature is its cloud-based platform for performance testing."

"The orchestration feature is the most valuable. It's like the tourist backend component of BlazeMeter. It allows me to essentially give BlazeMeter multiple JMeter scripts and a YAML file, and it will orchestrate and execute that load test and all those scripts as I define them."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that BlazeMeter provides easy access to its users while also ensuring that its reporting functionalities are good."

"It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process."

Cons

"The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating. I would rate it as a seven because they respond once they are available."

"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"The product currently doesn't allow users to run parallel thread groups, making it an area that should be considered for improvement."

"We encountered some minor bugs, and I would like to have the ability to add load generators to workspaces without having to use APIs. We can't do that now, so we're beholden to the APIs."

"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."

"A possible improvement could be the integration with APM tools."

"Version controlling of the test cases and the information, the ability to compare the current version and the previous version within Runscope would be really nice. The history shows who made the changes, but it doesn't compare the changes."

More BlazeMeter cons

"The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"It is an averagely priced product."

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Functionize?

The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Functionize?

The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Functionize?

We use the product to transition customers from manual to automated testing, particularly for web applications. It involves reducing team sizes, accelerating testing strategies, and providing speci...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Testim vs Functionize

Compared 41% of the time

mabl vs Functionize

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Functionize

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Functionize

Compared 11% of the time

ACCELQ Automate vs Functionize

Compared 5% of the time

More Functionize Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

July 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

June 2025

Download Functionize product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

No data available

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Functionize delivers an autonomous testing platform that incorporates AI and machine learning technologies to automate the painstaking software testing process.

Functionize

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Salesforce, Mastercard, Google, HP Enterprise, Cisco, Farmers Insurance, The General

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.