BMC AMI DevX vs IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BMC and IBM are both solutions in the Test Data Management category. BMC is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0. BMC holds a 12.2% mindshare in TDM, compared to IBM’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 23 BMC AMI DevX reviews

8,760 Views
1,226 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test D...

Read 15 IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) reviews

1,518 Views
1,397 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test D...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management and BMC AMI DevX are competing products in the test data management category. IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM appears to have an advantage in data management efficiency, whereas BMC AMI DevX is superior in integration capabilities.

Features: IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM includes automated test data generation, comprehensive data privacy features, and a sophisticated approach to data compliance. BMC AMI DevX offers extensive development tool integration, enhanced data masking capabilities, and flexibility with integrations for diverse development environments.

Room for Improvement: IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM could improve user interface design, reduce complexity in advanced functions, and enhance integration options with non-IBM tools. BMC AMI DevX may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving data privacy features, and expanding its data compliance functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM features a straightforward deployment model and comprehensive support that eases setup and onboarding. BMC AMI DevX, although slightly more complex to deploy, provides extensive customer support to quickly resolve technical challenges.

Pricing and ROI: IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM has a higher initial setup cost but yields a favorable ROI due to long-term efficiencies in data compliance and management. BMC AMI DevX features a more affordable initial investment with integration benefits, ensuring a rapid return on investment in development-heavy environments.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,351 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Test Data Management

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (2nd), Database Development and Management (11th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (3rd), AI Software Development (29th)

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test D...

Ranking in Test Data Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 12.2%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) is 6.0%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Data Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	12.2%
IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)	6.0%
Other	81.8%

Test Data Management

Featured Reviews

Wisdom Mbiza

Product Engineer at Absa Group

Modern tools have boosted mainframe file extraction speed and simplified everyday workflows

I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts you for passwords. Then when you have to switch sessions, because we usually have to switch between production and UAT, there's no quick way of switching between the two. Every time you try to switch, it prompts you to log in. Additionally, there's a pop-up that I always receive. When you click X on it, it doesn't disappear. Eventually, I just end up minimizing it. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads. It doesn't just immediately start up and it's ready. It takes a good solid two to three minutes before it's ready so that you can work on it. BMC AMI DevX's logins and the other ones I can understand because security has to be there, but I do feel that once I've logged in, I shouldn't need to log in again. The startup problem is the annoying one because if I want to do something, I need to open it two or three minutes earlier to give it time to load up. The startup problem is the one that definitely needs to be addressed.

Read full review

Ajai Lal

Project Manager at Mphasis

Supports both legacy and non-legacy systems

The solution's initial setup is neither complex nor too easy. Around six or seven people, including database administrators, were involved in the solution's deployment. On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup a four to five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that Compuware File-AID can actually map out control sections within load modules, or, as they're now known, program objects."

"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."

"It does our CICS NEWCOPYs and our Db2 binds for us, whereas before, that was a manual process. It takes a lot of the workload off of the operations folks and off the DBAs."

"Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development."

"For bank applications, DB2 is the best on the market."

"Our intention is to use Topaz for the next generation of mainframe developers to maintain mainframe applications."

"I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout."

"My guess is this would have taken twice as long, or we would have had many more issues without using Xpediter."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"Data masking with consistency across databases and applications is the most valuable feature."

"I like the features compared to other tools, as this tool is more flexible to use than other tools like an Oracle product or SAP product, and I think IBM tools are more flexible, and this tool is also a good product."

"Data archiving saved much storage and improved production performance."

"Data archiving reduces application performance issues and storage."

"Reduces the need to keep expanding data storage Faster query performance with shorter batch execution times Consistent data masking and data integrity in non-production environments Efficient test data management"

"Optim is a great tool for enterprise data movement, data masking, data sub-setting, data comparison, and data aging."

"The solution can be used on both legacy and non-legacy systems."

"The product has helped to streamline the Test Data Management (TDM) process."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) pros

Cons

"We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates."

"The ability to edit source code that has special characters is limited. The ability to incorporate or convert REXX into macros that are usable under the Topaz software is not there. And the REXX macros that I have developed over 40 years of work are useless, so I have a toolbox I can't use or deploy using the Topaz technology, while I can use it under MVS."

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing. I know they have some out there that we are not licensed for at this time, but it seems like some of the Eclipse tools that are used for other programming languages, they're all just built-in and they're a little more intuitive to the developers. Making those testing tools as intuitive as possible, and as integrated as possible into the workbench, would be really beneficial."

"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"Improvisation in the area of the self-service user interface for test data management is required to cater to test data needs."

"The tool needs to have more test data management features like synthetic data generation and data reservation."

"Data masking with InfoSphere Optim products creates intermediary extract files and writing the data to persistent storage, which means that extraction, masking, and insertion happen being separate processes, taking more for the process to run."

"Licensing could be improved. The PVU licensing mechanism is a limiting factor to expanding the use of the tool."

"In the IBM Optim tool, the Synthetic Test Data Generation feature is lagging behind."

"Installation is too cumbersome."

"Pricing and licensing is higher compared to other products."

"I would like to be able to combine different masking functions on the same column map, making more complex masking without the need of writing an Lua procedure."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"The price point is great."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"We purchase TDM's yearly license."

"You have to pay yearly for the license, which comes at a reduced cost. The monthly payment option for a shorter project duration is also good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

My understanding is that BMC AMI DevX is an enterprise product with custom licensing, so pricing is typically negotiated based on factors such as the modules purchased, organization size, and usage...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

BMC AMI DevX is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve, such as simplifying the initial installation and configuration, especially for first-time users. It could also i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

My main use case for BMC AMI DevX is to work with COBOL and JCL development on IBM. I mainly use it for editing, browsing data sets, submitting jobs, and debugging applications. I appreciate the Ec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

Gen vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 21% of the time

Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) vs IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 16% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 15% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 8% of the time

Accelario TDM vs IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

September 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

September 2026

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) report

Download IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

IBM Optim Test Data Management, Optim Test Data Management, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management focuses on data masking, test data management, and GDPR compliance, offering benefits like performance and storage optimization through data archiving.

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management is essential in managing data across non-production environments. It supports data extraction, sub-setting, and load processes, facilitating PII and PHI data protection. Organizations benefit from its flexibility, masking consistency, and cross-database applicability. Despite the need for enhanced data masking options and a more modern interface, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management provides robust capabilities for handling data through its life cycle, working with popular databases like Oracle, MS SQL Server, and DB2 without direct DB2i connectivity. Efficiency in data validation and transformation is acknowledged though improvements in test data generation and licensing terms are sought.

What key features does IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management offer?

Data Masking: Ensures GDPR compliance with comprehensive masking techniques.
Test Data Management: Streamlines extraction, sub-setting, and loading of test data.
Data Archiving: Improves performance and storage efficiency for better system management.
PII and PHI Protection: Safeguards sensitive information in non-production environments.
Cross-Database Applicability: Supports data management across multiple database systems.

What benefits and ROI should organizations consider?

Enhanced Security: Offers powerful protection for sensitive data, mitigating potential breaches.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse data environments and organizational requirements effectively.
Performance Optimization: Provides significant improvements in data processing and storage management.
User-Friendly Design: Ensures ease of use across different systems and applications.

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management is utilized in industries like financial, healthcare, and automotive for data archiving, masking, and test data management. It facilitates production-like data management, addressing data validation and transformation needs throughout the data life cycle, utilizing platforms such as Oracle, MS SQL Server, and DB2.

IBM

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

Dignity Health

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

September 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) report.

See our list of best Test Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.