Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BMC AMI DevX vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) comparison

BMC and Rocket Software are both solutions in the Software Configuration Management category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.7, while Rocket Software is ranked #6. BMC holds a 16.9% mindshare in SCM, compared to Rocket Software’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rocket Software users who would recommend it.
BMC AMI DevX
Read 19 BMC AMI DevX reviews
  • 4,427 Views
  • 974 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (forme...
Read 3 Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) reviews
  • 564 Views
  • 564 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF and BMC AMI DevX compete in enterprise software management. BMC AMI DevX has an edge in advanced features, whereas Rocket ChangeMan ZMF is favorable in pricing and support, presenting potential for better ROI.

Features: Rocket ChangeMan ZMF includes robust change management capabilities, seamless integration with existing mainframe environments, and effective support tools. BMC AMI DevX offers advanced automation, comprehensive monitoring features, and enhanced operational efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rocket ChangeMan ZMF provides a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer support, facilitating seamless integration. BMC AMI DevX offers a modern deployment model focusing on automation but may involve a learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Rocket ChangeMan ZMF generally comes with competitive pricing and lower initial setup costs, leading to potentially faster ROI. BMC AMI DevX may incur higher setup costs, but its advanced features justify the investment for those seeking extensive automation.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BMC AMI DevX vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 880,490 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Debugging (6th), Database Development and Management (17th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (6th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (7th)
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (forme...
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 16.9%, down from 29.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) is 8.8%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Configuration Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BMC AMI DevX16.9%
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)8.8%
Other74.3%
Software Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

Brian Westerman - PeerSpot reviewer
Brian Westerman
Director of R&D at Syzygy Inc.
Helps to make mainframe data management process easier and saves manhours
We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates.
Read full review
reviewer1527093 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1527093
Development Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Very flexible with Johnny-on-the-spot tech support
I would like to see them enable parallel development for online. It's available now for batch stuff on the mainframe. Jenkins, IBM, and Rocket all supposedly already have safe and workable version of Git for the mainframe. With that in mind, we need to know where our feature is. Unfortunately, as good as ChangeMan is, if we're listing downfalls, they should be talking to me about this. Not me having to go talk to them about it. Hopefully, they have this in the works and they are positioning their product for the future. That's just a straightforward comment. It really comes down to whether they are complacent or not. The other thing that should improve is cost. Git, even on the mainframe, a large part of the components "free". They're the way you set them up yourselves and they're self-sustaining and built into the infrastructure. You can't charge me for that. I gave ChangeMan an overall score of eight, but what could drive them to a nine is coming up with a way for all my code that belongs together to be tracked and moved together. Everything should move based upon the mainframe; it needs to be alerted and synchronized.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"From a user perspective, the GUIs make it easier for people to see and interact with files on the mainframe."
"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."
"Once we got the configurations and deployment rolled out, it was very stable. I haven't had any major issues with Eclipse or the Topaz Workbench plugins."
"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."
"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."
"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."
"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"
"Test data management capabilities are good."
More BMC AMI DevX pros
"Scalability is great. It has absolutely met every need for us so far. We do have some concurrent development paths and we're able to flexibly assign variables. At the same time, our skeletons assemble where we want them to, so the scalability is very good."
"We audit once a year for our ChangeMan access, accurate financial programs, and all of that. Auditors really love ChangeMan for how easy it is to get through and how tight the security is on it. Our internal auditors, external auditors, and SOX editors love this solution. We're in the healthcare business, so HIPAA regulations and all such things are a big deal, and this makes all that really simple."
 

Cons

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."
"The ability to edit source code that has special characters is limited. The ability to incorporate or convert REXX into macros that are usable under the Topaz software is not there. And the REXX macros that I have developed over 40 years of work are useless, so I have a toolbox I can't use or deploy using the Topaz technology, while I can use it under MVS."
"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."
"It's a very complicated tool."
"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."
"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."
"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."
"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."
More BMC AMI DevX cons
"As such, there's nothing wrong with the product. It is great, but there are small things that can be better to make it much more friendly. The way you navigate through fields can be improved. If I'm going to stage a component over something that exists and that I've created in another library, and I want to pull it in and write it over what I've got there in my package, I've got to type in that data set name every time. That can be aggravating. It is not a big deal. The way things are sorted can also be improved. If you're doing a delete of a bunch of components, you can't sort those out by type or anything. Some things are just standard, and you can't look at them in a way that would be helpful."
"I would like to see them enable parallel development for online. It's available now for batch stuff on the mainframe. Jenkins, IBM, and Rocket all supposedly already have safe and workable version of Git for the mainframe. With that in mind, we need to know where our feature is."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price point is great."
"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."
"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."
"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."
"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."
"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."
"It's on a yearly basis. I am not aware of any additional costs."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
880,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
34%
Insurance Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Insurance Company
11%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise16
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Compuware File-AID?
The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Compuware File-AID?
We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Compuware File-AID?
We use the solution clone test files.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 19% of the time
IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 11% of the time
InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 6% of the time
Rocket Enterprise Developer (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX Logo
Rocket Enterprise Developer (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX
Compared 5% of the time
More BMC AMI DevX Competitors
Endevor vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
Endevor vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 38% of the time
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 12% of the time
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 11% of the time
OpenText Dimensions CM vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Logo
OpenText Dimensions CM vs Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Compared 7% of the time
More Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BMC AMI DevX
January 2026
BMC AMI DevX reportDownload BMC AMI DevX product report
Buyer's Guide
Software Configuration Management
January 2026
Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) reportDownload Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) product report
 

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline
Open Text, Micro Focus ChangeMan ZMF
 

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?
  • Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
  • Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
  • Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
  • Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
  • Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
  • Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
  • Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
  • Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

Change management solutions that tackle the complexity of developing, deploying and maintaining software applications.

Rocket Software
 

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom
SPTS Technologies, Generali France, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH), Kutxa-Vital-Banco Madrid, Space and Naval Warfare Information Technology Center (SPAWAR ITC)
Buyer's Guide
BMC AMI DevX vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
December 2025
Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product)
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
880,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BMC AMI DevX vs. Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) report.
See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.