BMC AMI DevX vs Gen comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Application Development category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #3. BMC holds a 29.2% mindshare in MAD, compared to Broadcom’s 11.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 20 BMC AMI DevX reviews

6,230 Views
1,371 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Gen

Read 6 Gen reviews

1,206 Views
1,194 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Gen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Gen and BMC AMI DevX are competing in the enterprise software market. BMC AMI DevX appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive service.

Features: Gen offers robust integration, versatile development capabilities, and extensive lifecycle management. BMC AMI DevX provides specialized features for system operations, enhanced automation, and a broad feature set for competitive environments.

Room for Improvement: Gen could enhance user-friendly interfaces, offer more granular security features, and improve real-time analytics capabilities. BMC AMI DevX might focus on more straightforward customization, better integration with third-party tools, and more affordable pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX supports flexible deployment, backed by proactive customer engagement. Gen facilitates streamlined deployment with simple configurations, aligning with environments preferring minimal setup complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Gen is known for lower setup costs and balanced ROI with stable performance gains. BMC AMI DevX, despite higher setup costs, offers strong ROI through long-term gains thanks to its extensive feature set and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,611 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (6th), Database Development and Management (16th), Test Data Management (5th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (4th), AI Software Development (217th)

Gen

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Mainframe Application Development category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 29.2%, down from 43.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gen is 11.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Application Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	29.2%
Gen	11.5%
Other	59.3%

Mainframe Application Development

Featured Reviews

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Tight deployment controls have secured production and simplified complex release rollbacks

The best feature of BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline that impresses me is the fallback functionality. The fallback functionality impresses me because when developers deploy large releases involving multiple components, such as COBOL programs, underlying copy books, and CICS modules, backing out changes would typically become a nightmare. With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package. If they deployed 100 components and want to back out everything, they can do so with one function and back out all components without worrying about backing out each individual component. They can back out the entire deployment set, which handles everything and brings them back to the previous versions. Developers can also selectively back out a subset of the deployed components. They also have the ability to revert to not just the most previous version but can go back several versions if they choose to do so. This gives them a lot of flexibility.

Read full review

Ismo Remes

Consultant

Full packets enable software implementation on the mainframe and client sides

I rate it eight out of 10. It's just very powerful tool, very powerful product to use. Nowadays, there are a couple of mainframe companies, using mainframe products, so to be honest, I'm not recommending it. Of course, if you have mainframe and you have do something in the mainframe that’s different.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline is a solid product that any company can benefit from if they want to have tight control and a standard way of deploying applications into production in a secure manner."

"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."

"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."

"I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout."

"With the use of ISPW, we were able to reduce our deployment time for specific applications by utilizing the auto-deploy features."

"The most valuable feature of Topaz is Xpediter, it's more flexible than Xpediter through MVS."

"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."

"Our intention is to use Topaz for the next generation of mainframe developers to maintain mainframe applications."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"If you want to be the first in market and you have a short time to generate, or to develop your application, and if you're looking for a platform that supports multiple frameworks, multiple platforms such as mainframe, Java, and .Net, or the others, you need a modelling tool, rather than a language or technology."

"If you’re writing a simple barebones COBOL program, it may take 20-30 hours, but with a solution like this it can be done in around four hours."

"It has lived long beyond what people thought was its life expectancy as a product, largely because it is such a quality tool that people can't replace."

"Advantage Gen greatly enhanced productivity as well as development of solutions in mainframes, Client, and server applications."

"The so-called full packets, so you can develop software and systems using these packets, and implement software on the mainframe side and the client side."

"You can easily manage the code, and you can easily find other changes, other group changes, other models, other components."

"Full packets, enable you to develop software and systems using these packets, and implement software on the mainframe side and the client side. You can use the same packets, so it's very powerful."

"Coding on CA Gen is easy."

More Gen pros

Cons

"One thing I would really like to see some improvement on is the promotion diagnostic messages."

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

"It often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"The ability to edit source code that has special characters is limited. The ability to incorporate or convert REXX into macros that are usable under the Topaz software is not there. And the REXX macros that I have developed over 40 years of work are useless, so I have a toolbox I can't use or deploy using the Topaz technology, while I can use it under MVS."

"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."

"The ability to incorporate or convert REXX into macros that are usable under the Topaz software is not there, and the REXX macros that I have developed over 40 years of work are useless, so I have a toolbox I can't use or deploy using the Topaz technology, while I can use it under MVS."

"One thing I would really like to see some improvement on is the promotion diagnostic messages. It invokes utilities "under the covers" to copy components, and it does not echo back any of the error messages from those utilities."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"The product needs to be well marketed, then adopted. I am not seeing many customers using the product."

"The weak side is, I cannot use the DB2 specifications, DB2 comments, easily."

"The world is changing, the technologies are changing - COOL:Gen needs to change as well."

"Personally, I think the tool has taken a turn for the worse."

"Nowadays, there are a couple of mainframe companies, using mainframe products, so to be honest, I'm not recommending it."

"I cannot use DB2 specifications, DB2 comments, easily."

"If I look into the native COBOL language it can be more efficient, and CA Gen adds what seems to be some unnecessary lines of code; it’s not an apples to apples comparison."

"The product needs to be well marketed, then adopted. I am not seeing many customers using the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"The price point is great."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Application Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Insurance Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

It's a very complicated tool. Sometimes the customer wants better, faster transaction times. They want the solution to move as fast as possible. We're trying to scale and grow our application with ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

We do development for our customers and we use Topaz to do backend systems for some Latin American banks. It's for enterprise data. It runs on AWS. I'm working on performance testing to do batch pe...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 9% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 vs Gen

Compared 27% of the time

IBM Developer for z/OS Enterprise Edition (IDzEE) vs Gen

Compared 25% of the time

Endevor vs Gen

Compared 14% of the time

More Gen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

April 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Endevor vs. Gen

April 2026

Download Gen product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA Gen

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

Gen is a cutting-edge tool designed to streamline operations for tech-savvy audiences, focusing on diverse industries to optimize performance efficiently. Specifically crafted with advanced functionalities, Gen offers a unique approach to digital solutions, enhancing task management and boosting productivity.

Tailored to meet the demands of knowledgeable users, Gen integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, providing a robust platform that supports dynamic operations. Its intuitive interface, powered by innovative technology, facilitates smooth task execution and cultivates an agile working environment. Gen's adaptability allows users to leverage its capabilities across different industry sectors, ensuring optimal results and high productivity. It combines precision with user-friendly design, catering to the techno-savvy professionals who seek efficiency and speed without compromising on quality.

What key features define Gen's capabilities?

Seamless integration: Easily integrates with current systems to streamline workflows.
Scalability: Adapts to business growth, handling increased demand efficiently.
Automation: Automates repetitive tasks, freeing up time for strategic initiatives.

What benefits can users expect when exploring Gen reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational costs through process optimization.
Improved productivity: Enhances team performance by streamlining task management.
Enhanced flexibility: Offers adaptable solutions tailored to specific industry needs.

In industries such as logistics, healthcare, and finance, Gen implementation translates to tailored processes that align resources with precise requirements, ensuring substantial gains in efficiency. Through its strategic design, Gen meets industry-specific standards, streamlining processes and enhancing output quality and speed.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

Global bank

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

April 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen report.

See our list of best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Application Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.