BMC AMI DevX vs Gen comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Application Development category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #2. BMC holds a 27.3% mindshare in MAD, compared to Broadcom’s 12.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 21 BMC AMI DevX reviews

6,965 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Gen

Read 6 Gen reviews

1,422 Views
1,408 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Gen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Gen and BMC AMI DevX are competing in the enterprise software market. BMC AMI DevX appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive service.

Features: Gen offers robust integration, versatile development capabilities, and extensive lifecycle management. BMC AMI DevX provides specialized features for system operations, enhanced automation, and a broad feature set for competitive environments.

Room for Improvement: Gen could enhance user-friendly interfaces, offer more granular security features, and improve real-time analytics capabilities. BMC AMI DevX might focus on more straightforward customization, better integration with third-party tools, and more affordable pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX supports flexible deployment, backed by proactive customer engagement. Gen facilitates streamlined deployment with simple configurations, aligning with environments preferring minimal setup complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Gen is known for lower setup costs and balanced ROI with stable performance gains. BMC AMI DevX, despite higher setup costs, offers strong ROI through long-term gains thanks to its extensive feature set and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,258 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (4th), Database Development and Management (16th), Test Data Management (5th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (4th), AI Software Development (202nd)

Gen

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Mainframe Application Development category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 27.3%, down from 42.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gen is 12.3%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Application Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	27.3%
Gen	12.3%
Other	60.4%

Mainframe Application Development

Featured Reviews

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Tight deployment controls have secured production and simplified complex release rollbacks

The best feature of BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline that impresses me is the fallback functionality. The fallback functionality impresses me because when developers deploy large releases involving multiple components, such as COBOL programs, underlying copy books, and CICS modules, backing out changes would typically become a nightmare. With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package. If they deployed 100 components and want to back out everything, they can do so with one function and back out all components without worrying about backing out each individual component. They can back out the entire deployment set, which handles everything and brings them back to the previous versions. Developers can also selectively back out a subset of the deployed components. They also have the ability to revert to not just the most previous version but can go back several versions if they choose to do so. This gives them a lot of flexibility.

Read full review

Ismo Remes

Consultant

Full packets enable software implementation on the mainframe and client sides

I rate it eight out of 10. It's just very powerful tool, very powerful product to use. Nowadays, there are a couple of mainframe companies, using mainframe products, so to be honest, I'm not recommending it. Of course, if you have mainframe and you have do something in the mainframe that’s different.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

"We have seen an improvement in the rate and level of quality at which we deploy changes."

"I like that Compuware File-AID can actually map out control sections within load modules, or, as they're now known, program objects."

"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."

"The plugin ISPW integrated into Eclipse is a really valuable functionality for developers who already use it."

"ISPW is an excellent product; it does everything the developers need it to do, we were able to build it and customize it very simply as we became more familiar with how the system works during installation, and it doesn't need a lot of care and feeding once it's up and running."

"I think the most valuable features are code management, code deployment, and code generation. The fact that those three features are included makes BMC Compuware ISPW a robust product. If one of those features was missing, it would be less robust and less interesting. But because it has those three features, it is a very good solution for code development and management."

"The most valuable feature of Topaz is Xpediter. It's more flexible than Xpediter through MVS."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"Advantage Gen greatly enhanced productivity as well as development of solutions in mainframes, Client, and server applications."

"CA Gen has provided us web development capability."

"Full packets, enable you to develop software and systems using these packets, and implement software on the mainframe side and the client side. You can use the same packets, so it's very powerful."

"It has lived long beyond what people thought was its life expectancy as a product, largely because it is such a quality tool that people can't replace."

"If you’re writing a simple barebones COBOL program, it may take 20-30 hours, but with a solution like this it can be done in around four hours."

"If you want to be the first in market and you have a short time to generate, or to develop your application, and if you're looking for a platform that supports multiple frameworks, multiple platforms such as mainframe, Java, and .Net, or the others, you need a modelling tool, rather than a language or technology."

"Coding on CA Gen is easy."

"You can easily manage the code, and you can easily find other changes, other group changes, other models, other components."

Cons

"The only thing that bothers me about BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline is the screen movement."

"It would be good if the vendors would work together or at least have some collaboration between them, so they would know what would work and what wouldn't work. Right now, the way things are working, they're relying on the customer to make everything work."

"It would be nice to have an audit trail to see what mainframe developers are using what."

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing. I know they have some out there that we are not licensed for at this time, but it seems like some of the Eclipse tools that are used for other programming languages, they're all just built-in and they're a little more intuitive to the developers. Making those testing tools as intuitive as possible, and as integrated as possible into the workbench, would be really beneficial."

"I find it more cumbersome to use Topaz."

"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."

"The ISPW plugin could be improved to add some functionality which is already in ISPF panels and not in the plugin."

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"The weak side is, I cannot use the DB2 specifications, DB2 comments, easily."

"The world is changing, the technologies are changing - COOL:Gen needs to change as well."

"The product needs to be well marketed, then adopted. I am not seeing many customers using the product."

"If I look into the native COBOL language it can be more efficient, and CA Gen adds what seems to be some unnecessary lines of code; it’s not an apples to apples comparison."

"Nowadays, there are a couple of mainframe companies, using mainframe products, so to be honest, I'm not recommending it."

"Personally, I think the tool has taken a turn for the worse."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The price point is great."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Application Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	17

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

To improve BMC AMI DevX, consideration should be given to cloud-style provisioning and development models, as well as integration of more AI capabilities. Enhancements in VS Code extensions to deve...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

BMC AMI DevX solutions are primarily used for mainframe-based resources and application development, encompassing not only COBOL but also Workbench and VS Code for various purposes. Data management...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 7% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

IBM Developer for z/OS Enterprise Edition (IDzEE) vs Gen

Compared 27% of the time

BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 vs Gen

Compared 25% of the time

Endevor vs Gen

Compared 17% of the time

More Gen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

June 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Endevor vs. Gen

April 2026

Download Gen product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA Gen

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

Gen is a cutting-edge tool designed to streamline operations for tech-savvy audiences, focusing on diverse industries to optimize performance efficiently. Specifically crafted with advanced functionalities, Gen offers a unique approach to digital solutions, enhancing task management and boosting productivity.

Tailored to meet the demands of knowledgeable users, Gen integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, providing a robust platform that supports dynamic operations. Its intuitive interface, powered by innovative technology, facilitates smooth task execution and cultivates an agile working environment. Gen's adaptability allows users to leverage its capabilities across different industry sectors, ensuring optimal results and high productivity. It combines precision with user-friendly design, catering to the techno-savvy professionals who seek efficiency and speed without compromising on quality.

What key features define Gen's capabilities?

Seamless integration: Easily integrates with current systems to streamline workflows.
Scalability: Adapts to business growth, handling increased demand efficiently.
Automation: Automates repetitive tasks, freeing up time for strategic initiatives.

What benefits can users expect when exploring Gen reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational costs through process optimization.
Improved productivity: Enhances team performance by streamlining task management.
Enhanced flexibility: Offers adaptable solutions tailored to specific industry needs.

In industries such as logistics, healthcare, and finance, Gen implementation translates to tailored processes that align resources with precise requirements, ensuring substantial gains in efficiency. Through its strategic design, Gen meets industry-specific standards, streamlining processes and enhancing output quality and speed.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

Global bank

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

April 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen report.

See our list of best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Application Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.