BMC AMI DevX vs Gen comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Application Development category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #3. BMC holds a 32.9% mindshare in MAD, compared to Broadcom’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 19 BMC AMI DevX reviews

4,709 Views
1,224 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Gen

Read 6 Gen reviews

623 Views
623 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Gen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Gen and BMC AMI DevX are competing in the enterprise software market. BMC AMI DevX has the upper hand in terms of feature richness, making it appealing for organizations needing comprehensive mainframe tools.

Features: Gen is known for robust code generation, model-driven development, and agility across platforms including COBOL, Java, and Windows. BMC AMI DevX offers advanced debugging, comprehensive mainframe support, and integrates seamlessly with DevOps environments.

Room for Improvement: Gen could enhance cloud integration, provide more customizable templates, and improve analytics capabilities. BMC AMI DevX could simplify its user interface, offer better real-time collaboration tools, and streamline its deployment across varied environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Gen allows straightforward deployment suitable for various business sizes, with responsive customer service. BMC AMI DevX offers more complex deployment tailored for large enterprises with extensive customer service coverage.

Pricing and ROI: Gen provides lower initial setup costs and favorable pricing enhancing ROI for budget-conscious organizations. BMC AMI DevX, while having higher initial costs, ensures significant long-term ROI with its advanced features and mainframe-centric value.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,606 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (7th), Database Development and Management (18th), Test Data Management (6th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (6th), AI Software Development (205th)

Gen

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Mainframe Application Development category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 32.9%, down from 43.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gen is 7.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Application Development Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BMC AMI DevX	32.9%
Gen	7.6%
Other	59.5%

Mainframe Application Development

Featured Reviews

RobertSamson

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Improves disaster recovery processes and offers an efficient CPU cycle optimization

Using BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS has greatly improved our database administration tasks. Although we don't test the database before production, we have experienced benefits in disaster recovery situations and capacity management. For instance, when facing capacity issues during peak transaction times, I've been able to quickly allocate additional resources to ensure smooth operations. This has been crucial, especially during times when the demand surges, such as peak flight hours.

Read full review

Ismo Remes

Consultant

Full packets enable software implementation on the mainframe and client sides

I rate it eight out of 10. It's just very powerful tool, very powerful product to use. Nowadays, there are a couple of mainframe companies, using mainframe products, so to be honest, I'm not recommending it. Of course, if you have mainframe and you have do something in the mainframe that’s different.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."

"From a user perspective, the GUIs make it easier for people to see and interact with files on the mainframe."

"We can develop in parallel today on ISPF, but it's giving us the advantage of the newer interface into the mainframe programming languages that younger programmers can use and are familiar with, rather than using the ISPF green screen."

"Test data management capabilities are good."

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."

"Once we got the configurations and deployment rolled out, it was very stable. I haven't had any major issues with Eclipse or the Topaz Workbench plugins."

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"CA Gen has provided us web development capability."

"Full packets, enable you to develop software and systems using these packets, and implement software on the mainframe side and the client side. You can use the same packets, so it's very powerful."

"You can easily manage the code, and you can easily find other changes, other group changes, other models, other components."

Cons

"It often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"It's a very complicated tool."

"We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates."

"DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

"One thing I would really like to see some improvement on is the promotion diagnostic messages. It invokes utilities "under the covers" to copy components, and it does not echo back any of the error messages from those utilities."

"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution."

"Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"I cannot use DB2 specifications, DB2 comments, easily."

"The product needs to be well marketed, then adopted. I am not seeing many customers using the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"The price point is great."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Application Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution. As someone involved in managing infrastructure, understandi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

From my perspective as an infrastructure guy, the most valuable aspect of BMC's data management solutions was their ability to optimize CPU cycles, improving IMS performance without directly impact...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 16% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 9% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

IBM Developer for z/OS Enterprise Edition (IDzEE) vs Gen

Compared 34% of the time

BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 vs Gen

Compared 29% of the time

More Gen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

February 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Endevor vs. Gen

February 2026

Download Gen product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA Gen

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

CA Gen provides a single, integrated development environment that can help your teams create and maintain large-scale business applications for multiple platforms. This streamlined environment can help reduce manual labor and speed migration time while ensuring the future relevance of existing environments and applications.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

Global bank

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

February 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. Gen report.

See our list of best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Application Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.