Bonita vs QPR ProcessDesigner comparison

Bonitasoft and QPR Software are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Bonitasoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2, while QPR Software is ranked #25. Bonitasoft holds a 4.7% mindshare in BPD, compared to QPR Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

2,533 Views
1,866 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

QPR ProcessDesigner

Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews

196 Views
135 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bonita

QPR ProcessDesigner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

QPR ProcessDesigner and Bonita compete in the business process management market. QPR ProcessDesigner is favored for its pricing and support, while Bonita's robust features and capabilities justify its cost, making them stand out in different aspects.

Features: QPR ProcessDesigner is known for comprehensive modeling capabilities, compliance management, and extensive documentation. Bonita is recognized for flexibility, integration capabilities, and business IT alignment, offering a broader feature set that enhances adaptability for complex enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR ProcessDesigner offers straightforward deployment, with accessible support and detailed documentation easing initial setup. Bonita has a more complex setup but offers exceptional customer service, extensive training, and community support ensuring smooth operations despite the initial challenges.

Pricing and ROI: QPR ProcessDesigner offers attractive pricing models with a lower initial setup cost, suggesting a quicker ROI. Bonita's setup is more expensive, indicating a longer ROI period, but its comprehensive functionality and efficiency potential could lead to significant long-term ROI, appealing to businesses with complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. QPR ProcessDesigner Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Design

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (14th), Process Automation (12th)

QPR ProcessDesigner

Ranking in Business Process Design

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Bonita is 4.7%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

it_user211722

Solution Architect at Vodafone New Zealand

FactView was easy to use and integrate.

Process simulation Performance monitoring Business intelligence I was a consultant mainly at Standard Bank, I worked for the supplier of the QPR Suite. It was used mainly for balanced scorecard to track organisation performance, but also for process mapping and monitoring as part of their Six…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."

"Development of forms and flows."

"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."

"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

"The solution is easy to use."

More Bonita pros

"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."

"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."

Cons

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"It is missing some important features that other products have."

"The dashboard has limited features."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"There is a considerable learning curve."

"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

More Bonita cons

"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 58% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 18% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 50% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 50% of the time

More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

March 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

March 2025

Download QPR ProcessDesigner product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

ALPLA

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

March 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. QPR ProcessDesigner and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. QPR ProcessDesigner report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.