Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Everest Blueriq comparison

Boomi and Everest are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Boomi is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.8, while Everest is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0. Boomi holds a 0.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to Everest’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Everest users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Read 6 Boomi AtomSphere Flow reviews

492 Views
408 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Everest Blueriq

Read 2 Everest Blueriq reviews

205 Views
138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Everest Blueriq

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Everest Blueriq and Boomi AtomSphere Flow compete in application integration and automation. Everest Blueriq has an advantage in terms of customization and flexibility, while Boomi AtomSphere Flow leads with integration capabilities and scalability.

Features: Everest Blueriq provides a robust rule engine, customization options, and comprehensive control over processes. Boomi AtomSphere Flow includes extensive pre-built connectors, simplified integration processes, and broad connectivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everest Blueriq offers a flexible deployment model adaptable to complex environments and responsive customer service. Boomi AtomSphere Flow focuses on rapid deployment with a user-friendly platform and extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Everest Blueriq typically has higher initial setup costs due to customization, delivering strong ROI for businesses with specific requirements. Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing to those seeking quick value realization and lower upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (13th)

Everest Blueriq

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Everest Blueriq is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets

From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.

Read full review

ChrisBiemans

Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.

Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities

We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."

"The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients."

"Boomi enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."

"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

Cons

"Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility."

"Its stability could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."

"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."

"The technical support is rated around 6.5 to seven out of ten. It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness."

"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."

"Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...

See all answers

What do you like most about Everest Blueriq?

The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everest Blueriq?

The platform's initial setup process could be better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Everest Blueriq?

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 18% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 16% of the time

Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 14% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Competitors

Pega Platform vs Everest Blueriq

Compared 100% of the time

More Everest Blueriq Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Everest Blueriq product report

Also Known As

Boomi Flow

Blueriq, Aquima

Overview

Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

Boomi

Blueriq is the software platform for organizations with knowledge-based, rule-driven business processes. By modeling these processes in one central area, automate and integrate, you can respond quickly to changes, creating the ultimate customer experience and streamline your services.

Everest

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Automation Anywhere and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.