BrowserStack and ReadyAPI are key competitors in software testing. BrowserStack has an edge in usability and accessibility, providing seamless integration, whereas ReadyAPI excels in API testing and data-driven testing capabilities for comprehensive testing needs.
Features: BrowserStack provides live cross-browser testing, automated testing on numerous real devices, and seamless integration with development pipelines. ReadyAPI offers robust API testing functionalities, integration with CI/CD tools, and advanced test scenario creation capabilities.
Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could enhance its API testing support, offer more detailed reporting options, and improve performance analysis features. ReadyAPI could simplify its setup process, enhance its user interface for accessibility, and expand its mobile testing functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BrowserStack offers straightforward cloud-based deployment with minimal setup, alongside responsive customer service. ReadyAPI requires a more complex on-premises setup, with extensive customization options, but may require more resources for deployment and support.
Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack's pricing reflects good ROI for browser compatibility testing on varied devices. ReadyAPI, while more expensive initially, provides significant ROI through powerful API testing tools, justified for high-quality API performance focus.
BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.