Camunda vs QPR ProcessDesigner comparison

Camunda and QPR Software are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while QPR Software is ranked #25. Camunda holds a 12.5% mindshare in BPD, compared to QPR Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

7,546 Views
5,125 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

QPR ProcessDesigner

Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews

196 Views
135 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

QPR ProcessDesigner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

QPR ProcessDesigner and Camunda are competing products in process management and orchestration. Camunda has an advantage due to its advanced features and developer-friendly tools, while QPR ProcessDesigner offers better support services for immediate customer assistance.

Features: QPR ProcessDesigner is known for its visualization capabilities, integration options, and tools for modeling, analyzing, and enhancing processes. Camunda offers robust automation and scalability with BPMN support, extensible APIs, and a comprehensive feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR ProcessDesigner is appreciated for its easy deployment and comprehensive support, appealing to businesses requiring quick implementation. Camunda allows for flexible deployment in complex environments but may require more technical expertise, making QPR more attractive for those needing ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: QPR ProcessDesigner provides a predictable pricing model with lower initial setup costs, benefiting budget-conscious organizations. Camunda's setup costs may be higher, but its features support significant ROI for companies focused on long-term automation and customization, making it ideal for scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st)

QPR ProcessDesigner

Ranking in Business Process Design

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 12.5%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

it_user211722

Solution Architect at Vodafone New Zealand

FactView was easy to use and integrate.

Process simulation Performance monitoring Business intelligence I was a consultant mainly at Standard Bank, I worked for the supplier of the QPR Suite. It was used mainly for balanced scorecard to track organisation performance, but also for process mapping and monitoring as part of their Six…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"

"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."

"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."

"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."

"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."

"The use of Java is a big plus for our intern developers, and Camunda scales well, as many of our departments are already using it in production with dedicated teams."

"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."

More Camunda pros

"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."

"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."

Cons

"I would like to see better pricing."

"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."

"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."

"There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible."

"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."

"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."

"The initial setup can be complex for business users."

"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."

More Camunda cons

"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."

"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"We use the free version."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 12% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 50% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner

Compared 50% of the time

More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

March 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

March 2025

Download QPR ProcessDesigner product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

ALPLA

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

March 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. QPR ProcessDesigner report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.