Catchpoint vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) comparison

Catchpoint and Google are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Catchpoint is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.0, while Google is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0. Catchpoint holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Google’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,020 Views
614 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

2,456 Views
2,209 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Google Cloud's operations s...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Catchpoint and Google Cloud's operations suite compete in the monitoring and performance management category. Catchpoint tends to have an edge in pricing and support, while Google Cloud's operations suite is often preferred for its feature set, which many feel justifies the higher price point.

Features: Catchpoint offers comprehensive external monitoring capabilities, synthetic tests, and a broad view of internet performance. Google Cloud’s operations suite features seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, extensive logging, and robust alerting functions.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint can be complex to configure and has occasional data discrepancies. Google Cloud's operations suite could improve real-time monitoring and intuitive configuration processes, and support responses could be faster.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint is straightforward to deploy but can be challenging during initial setup, with positively rated customer service. Google Cloud's operations suite is easy to deploy, especially for existing Google users, though support can be slow.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint is noted for competitive pricing and strong ROI, while Google Cloud's operations suite, though more expensive, justifies its cost with powerful features and integration benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

40th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (59th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (9th)

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

26th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 1.1%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Carl Funk

Senior Manager at a training & coaching company with 10,001+ employees

The UI is well designed, so it's easy to get the visibility you want.

There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing. The other issue is the cost. The more data you collect, the more expensive it becomes. You sell your organization by saying we can get this feature set, but then you have to walk that back because we'll need more money to run every test. This is something hard to get out in your initial scoping. You provide Catchpoint with a series of tests and get a cost estimate, not realizing all the data you might have to collect long term. That was a big deal for us because we partly switched on the promise of saving money.

Read full review

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or BigQuery can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

More Catchpoint pros

"I like the monitoring feature."

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"

"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."

"Google's technical support is very good."

"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

Cons

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

More Catchpoint cons

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"The logging functionality could be better."

"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."

"It could be more stable."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The cost could be lower."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

53%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive simila...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?

If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Stackdriver?

I use the solution for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring. Our company's Java and Python logging teams mainly use it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Stackdriver?

The Ops Agent and logging transport feature of the solution have had a major impact on improving application performance. The solution also allows the transport of logs into log buckets, which is h...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 24% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 18% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 21% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Prometheus Group vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

April 2025

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

Real-time log management and analysis

Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

Built-in metrics observability at scale

Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

Monitor and improve your application's performance

Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

April 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.