Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Comodo cWatch comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (9th)
Comodo cWatch
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
25th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
CDN (12th)
 

Featured Reviews

Fernando Ortega - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2024
Simplifies our security management and enhances our ability to monitor and analyze logs effectively
By implementing Check Point CloudGuard WAF we aimed to address challenges related to enhancing security for web applications while leveraging powerful logging capabilities. We check false positives in CloudGuard WAF using logs and the interface, and we have had very few issues, which helps our business. Using preset policies, the solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies without requiring full data. The solution has cut our web application firewall costs because it is adaptable to our environment. My advice to new users would be to focus on the benefits of software as a service and ensure clarity in understanding pricing, particularly for DDoS protection. Overall, I would rate Check Point CloudGuard WAF as a ten out of ten.
Bernardo Murillo - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2024
Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly
I use the solution to detect vulnerabilities in the site The solution allows me to change my logo. It gives me a white-label portal because I am a partner. OWASP has been the most effective in malware prevention. It can detect if the headers are okay and do FTP scans. We get alerts if we have…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The portal is quite intuitive."
"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."
"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."
"Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI."
"On the endpoint side, the most valuable feature is undoubtedly the cloud-based management capability, along with the ransomware protection, despite not encountering any instances so far."
"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."
"The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"We get alerts if we have some malware."
 

Cons

"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."
"Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools."
"We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices."
"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."
"The trial version should be extended further so that QA test engineers can actually test the utilities in a real sense and can provide the maximum amount of feedback for enhancements."
"They need improved latency in the main window."
"The documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly."
"For the next release, I would suggest considering features like enhanced threat intelligence integration."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"The portal is a little slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."
"I find the pricing to be reasonable."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."
"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."
"The pricing is not that expensive considering what it offers."
"It is reasonable as compared to the other solutions."
"Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, costs $7."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Security Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Wholesaler/Distributor
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF. I would rate the cost of Check Point CloudGuard WAF as eight out of ten, with ten being the most costly.
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's code could be improved. While the GUI allows configuration for application-related features, specific definitions cannot be modified through the code. Ideally, we would...
What needs improvement with Comodo cWatch?
The portal is a little slow. I have to wait for it to load all the information. CDN's performance must be improved.
What is your primary use case for Comodo cWatch?
I use the solution to detect vulnerabilities in the site.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo cWatch?
Comodo cWatch’s price is very good compared to Cloudflare’s. The first level of Cloudflare costs us about $20. The next level costs $100. Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, cost...
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
cWatch
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto
Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Comodo cWatch and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.