Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
6th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
22nd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is 2.6%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer4572384 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 11, 2023
Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering
We used to use other security solutions (Windows Defender and Kaspersky), however, we had security incidents that affected us (viruses and ransomware) and they were very difficult to identify or when we did identify them it was already a long time after the incident occurred and we did not know the cause and therefore affected the operability of our company considerably. Since we made the decision to move to Check Point Harmony we have had greater visibility of everything that happens on our devices and take a preventive approach rather than a reactive strategy, in addition to being more confident that we have Check Point protecting us.
Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 7, 2022
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its ease of use is the most valuable feature. We had existing endpoints and it was an easy upgrade process. The interface board is also easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is it can be used for all kinds of endpoints, including mobile phones."
"It is easy to install from the cloud."
"Check Point Endpoint Security helps us ensure device control and security. It helps us make sure users can access only the network resources they should be accessing and keep malware to a minimum."
"Data security analytics enable us to prepare and take suitable precautions before landing in trouble and exposing confidential information."
"I found the fact of working across multiple attack vectors easy and more beneficial."
"The license plans are also very nice and distributed - allowing for a separation between types of users with more basic or more advanced options."
"The standout features are primarily EDR and MDR."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."
"The agents are easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."
"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."
 

Cons

"I would like to see them add features where we can use this license for mobile browsers, too."
"We would also like the application control module to be further developed in future versions to include applications commonly used or maintained by Check Point in order to be able to configure blocking policies more quickly."
"I think some work needs to be done to improve the integration with other third-party products, namely SIEM solutions."
"The solution has limitations if it's hosted on-prem or as a SaaS."
"The remote deployment with Check Point Endpoint Security requires improvement. We have to depend on some of their deployment tools. I would like a system endpoint protection management tool or a remote deployment tool."
"There are still functionalities that I have not been able to fully test and I would like to spend more time using the tool before offering an opinion to the IT Central community on this point."
"Off the top of my head, I can't think of a way it has improved my organization."
"Check Point Harmony is definitely pricier compared to other endpoints."
"The solution lacks device control."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."
"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."
"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are three different licensing models including basic, advanced, and complete, and it needs to be selected according to the endpoint."
"In comparison to other software solutions available on the market, it comes at a higher price point."
"In terms of licensing, have a buffer zone around your projects in terms of the amount of endpoints that you want to have. You can always have more, but it is best to leave room for a little increase or growth."
"The licensing cost for Check Point is $3 USD or $4 USD per end-user."
"I rate Check Point Harmony Endpoint's pricing a seven out of ten because it is a little high."
"We pay on an annual basis. There are no additional fees, they mostly tell us what we have to pay. We have budgeted for it."
"I bought them for 12 months and I genuinely cannot remember what I paid for them. I think it's about 100 pounds per user per year, so about 10 pounds a month per person."
"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It costs around ₱2,200 per endpoint."
"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
It scans all the endpoints in your cloud and on-premises for vulnerabilities, threats, and malware attacks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
The pricing is okay. It is in the enterprise range. It is not middle range. It is not so costly, but it is an enterprise.
What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
The only drawback is the integration process. For example, I want to integrate with my source platform. It took some time. That's the only concern regarding the integrations. Check Point Harmony En...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Endpoint Security, Endpoint Security, Check Point SandBlast Agent
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Boston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.