Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmk vs Cisco UCS Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.7
Cisco UCS Manager's excellent technical support excels in responsiveness and issue resolution, though upgrade processes may need multiple tickets.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.9
Cisco UCS Manager needs GUI improvements, better integration, simplified upgrades, enhanced security, and user-friendly, cost-effective deployment solutions.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Cisco UCS Manager offers scalability and adaptability, though it can require additional managers as environments grow and technology evolves.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.7
Cisco UCS Manager is costly but valued for reliability and stability, offering a comprehensive solution for enterprise data center management.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Cisco UCS Manager is highly stable, with minor issues effectively resolved, earning strong user confidence and high ratings.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Cisco UCS Manager enhances efficiency with flexible management, easy integration, and comprehensive control across network, storage, and compute resources.
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (14th), Server Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)
Cisco UCS Manager
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 2.9%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala - PeerSpot reviewer
A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring
The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.
Edwin Mwosa - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency
We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
32%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What needs improvement with Checkmk?
The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working. But basically, we're okay with it. The difficult part was adapting fro...
What is your primary use case for Checkmk?
We use it to monitor mainly Linux servers, including operating system metrics, processes, services, and so on. We also use scripting and monitoring logs.
What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?
When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?
Cisco UCS Manager pricing is on the expensive side. I would rate its affordability at three out of ten. It is not very affordable.
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?
I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself. This integration could prevent the need to switch betwee...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. Cisco UCS Manager and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.