Checkmk vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor comparison

Checkmk and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.4, while SolarWinds is ranked #39 with an average rating of 7.8. Checkmk holds a 2.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmk and SolarWinds Network Device Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 800,688 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmk is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Shiva_Prasad

Senior Technical Consultant at Black Box Network Services

Jan 25, 2024

A cloud solution for warehousing with a troubleshooting feature

The initial setup is straightforward. It's based on user requirements. We also conduct heat mapping using a couple of tools. The only requirement is to understand the technical or configuration aspects from the user's end and then configure it. Mist takes no more than 15 to 20 minutes for a particular deployment. You need to understand the end user's environment and have a concrete plan on whether it's a greenfield installation or an existing one, considering the density and height. Based on that, we need to develop a passive heat map. Then, you need to discuss with the user to understand exactly what needs to be configured and what they require in their environment. Based on that, you can proceed with the installation. Additionally, you can perform post-installation heat mapping to ensure it matches the earlier heat map. I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

Read full review

Marvin Nielson

Systems Programer at Box Elder School District

Nov 16, 2023

A highly scalable product that helps businesses monitor servers

I think those evaluating Checkmk need to run through its docs and do the simple stuff, and then start looking at the data after turning off all notifications, to begin with, and start slowly with the tool's usage, or else it will overwhelm you. The tool's potential users need to consider its prices since it consists of services and hosts. If you have the kind of nature where you want to gather all the data because you are not sure what you need and don't need initially, the number of services you use can go up quickly. Once you figure out what you really need and what is nonsense, the tool becomes easy, which is probably true with anything you use. I rate the overall tool a nine to nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Usman Shafeeq

Student at The Islamia University of Bahawalpur

Jul 26, 2024

Offers lower ping delay times and provide network monitoring and dashboard creation

I have some suggestions for improving the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor. First, consider enhancing the visual appeal of the graphs. You could include options for different types of graphs, such as network bandwidth, and add a scanning feature. By entering an IP address, SolarWinds could retrieve comprehensive information about the device, including the MAC address, device name, and image. Additionally, expanding the range of graphs available in SolarWinds would be beneficial, particularly for bandwidth monitoring. Implementing a notification system that sends alerts via email when a device goes down would also be valuable. Lastly, ensuring that SolarWinds remains lightweight could help organizations with less powerful machines, making the software more accessible. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."

"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"The deployment process is quick."

"I rate the product's initial setup process a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is a difficult phase and ten is an easy process."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is monitoring."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is it can alert you when a device is not working."

"I like the mapping that you could do and the dashboards were very pretty."

"The alerting functionality in SolarWinds Network Device Monitor helps us stay informed during off-hours by sending alerts if our main links or devices are impacted, allowing us to quickly address any issues."

"The product is useful for switches and IP phones."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pros

Cons

"The technical support needs improvement."

"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"The security could always be improved."

"If everything were in the package so that everything was ready to go out of the box, that would be ideal."

"The solution is not user-friendly."

"The reporting feature needs improvement because we are unable to configure reports that were included during initial implementation."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor lacks the granularity of other monitoring tools like LiveNX."

"The security needs improvement, which is why we are moving away from Solar Winds. We have security concerns."

"There is no mobile version of this product, and our team should be able to access it using a mobile device."

"Although I haven't explored all of the features available, I wouldn't mind if the software were made to be a bit more customizable."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"The product is affordable."

"The product is expensive."

"When compared with other solutions SolarWinds is more expensive."

"The enterprise license is good for the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor. However, it is expensive, they should reduce their price."

"Thankfully, it doesn't take a lot of manpower to install and deploy."

"I rate the product's price as three to three and a half or on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price, and ten means high price."

"I find the cost of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reasonable for our company. Though, I'm not aware of the exact licensing cost."

"The price of the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is good."

"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is not an expensive solution."

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Retailer

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The technical support needs improvement.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

Checkmk has been constantly improving the tool. I am quite impressed that Checkmk has been keeping up with changes. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

My company uses Checkmk to monitor our core servers, and we also use it for our network devices for more of a storing...

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

I rate the product's initial setup process a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is a difficult phase a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

It has a yearly license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?

It should provide user-friendly pages and device environment. When adding devices, you can view devices easily in a l...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 36% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 27% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 24% of the time

InfluxDB vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Competitors

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 47% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 19% of the time

Netdata vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Observium vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

FortiMonitor vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 36% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 29% of the time

ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 21% of the time

ThousandEyes vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2024

Download Juniper Mist Premium Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

September 2024

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

August 2024

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Network Device Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

Network Device Monitor

Learn More

Juniper

Checkmk

SolarWinds

Overview

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is a comprehensive network analytics solution that provides organizations with valuable insights into their network performance and user experience. The primary use case of this product is to enable IT teams to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their network infrastructure.

The most valuable functionality of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is its AI-driven insights and recommendations. Leveraging machine learning algorithms, it analyzes vast amounts of network data to identify anomalies, predict potential issues, and suggest remediation actions. This proactive approach helps organizations minimize network downtime, improve user experience, and optimize network performance.

By providing real-time visibility into network performance, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics helps organizations quickly identify and resolve network issues. It offers detailed analytics on network traffic, application performance, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to pinpoint the root cause of problems and take immediate action. This not only reduces troubleshooting time but also enhances overall network reliability.

Furthermore, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics enables organizations to optimize their network infrastructure. It provides insights into network capacity utilization, application usage patterns, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to make informed decisions about network design, resource allocation, and capacity planning. This helps organizations to ensure that their network is efficiently utilized and can support the growing demands of their users.

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Network Device Monitor is a free tool that makes it easy to monitor the real-time performance and health of a single device on your network with a desktop dashboard that alerts you when your device is in trouble.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Air Rarotonga

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

September 2024

Free Report: Checkmk vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.