

Chef and Nolio Release Automation are competing in IT automation. Chef shines with extensive community support, while Nolio excels in advanced release management capabilities, making them suitable for different enterprise needs.
Features: Chef offers flexibility and scalability with a powerful infrastructure automation language and integrates well with various ecosystems. Its community support allows for handling complex configurations. Nolio, however, provides detailed application deployment capabilities, reducing downtime and enhancing deployment speed. Its comprehensive release management tools support complex enterprise environments.
Room for Improvement: Chef may face challenges with rollback processes and requires more intuitive user interface elements for less technical users. Some users find Chef's initial setup complex and in need of simplification. Additionally, smaller teams might struggle with scaling Chef operations efficiently. Nolio could improve on the complexity of its initial setup and streamline its UI to make it more user-friendly for beginners. Its dedicated support could offer enhanced self-service features, and the system may require a more straightforward approach to integrate newer technologies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Chef offers a straightforward deployment model, benefiting from widespread community resources, which helps in seamless integration. Nolio, however, offers powerful automation capabilities tailored for large-scale deployments. Its dedicated customer support is beneficial for enterprises needing efficient and reliable technical assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Chef tends to have lower setup costs, appealing to startups and mid-sized companies looking for cost-effective automation solutions. Its open-source nature promises substantial ROI when fully utilized. Nolio demands a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI through its advanced, enterprise-grade functionalities, attracting larger organizations that value comprehensive release automation.
The return has been far more hours saved than spent.
Chef has provided a return on investment, particularly in needing fewer employees, as the tool significantly reduces the amount of human work required for many tasks.
We have seen significant improvement in the time and the way we make changes to the infrastructure.
We usually work with the Chef teams and community support, who are always willing to assist.
We leverage both to achieve the best option possible for scaling.
Chef's scalability handles a large number of nodes easily, allowing us to manage hundreds of servers consistently using the same set of cookbooks.
Chef's scalability is evident as the public sector organization I work at serves a population of 5 million, and we have had no problems with scaling.
It is a good tool to work with, offering a strong developer experience and community support.
Chef is stable.
In my experience, Chef is quite stable most of the time.
This might be because it is a six-year-old version, and we are supporting nearly 1,500 applications and 15,000 to 16,000 agents.
On support, I think there should be more focus on how we can achieve AI automations in answering questions for beginners and addressing deep concerns without general manual management.
Self-healing infrastructure continuously verifies that the system matches the desired state and can auto-correct configuration changes during the next run.
To improve Chef, making an interface with another language such as Python or Java that is well understood, as capable as Ruby, and even more widely adopted would demystify it a bit.
It is one of the greatest tools for continuous deployment, yet its popularity remains limited.
Licensing looks reasonable compared to the manual work of managing whole data centers with even 10,000 servers.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that we sidestepped it by using Cinc because none of the functionality that is exclusive to the paid version was actually in use in the organization.
Security is a key aspect that Chef can automate, monitor new features that are available, and even do patches without you getting involved.
Chef can manage hundreds or thousands of servers effortlessly, allowing for easy rollout of a single cookbook change to all machines.
When you have infrastructure as code and you already have everything apart from the environment-specific config, which you can specify in variables, then it is not only more repeatable and reliable, it is faster.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Chef | 1.5% |
| Nolio Release Automation | 1.8% |
| Other | 96.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 39 |
Chef, is the leader in DevOps, driving collaboration through code to automate infrastructure, security, compliance and applications. Chef provides a single path to production making it faster and safer to add value to applications and meet the demands of the customer. Deployed broadly in production by the Global 5000 and used by more than half of the Fortune 500, Chef develops 100 percent of its software as open source under the Apache 2.0 license with no restrictions on its use. Chef Enterprise Automation Stack™, a commercial distribution, is developed solely from that open source code and unifies security, compliance, infrastructure and application automation with observability. Chef provides an unequaled developer experience for the Coded Enterprise by enabling users to express infrastructure, security policies and the application lifecycle as code, modernizing development, packaging and delivery of any application to any platform. For more information, visit http://chef.io and follow @chef.
CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.