Cisco Compute Hyperconverged vs VMware vSAN comparison

Cisco and Broadcom are both solutions in the HCI category. Cisco is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.0, while Broadcom is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Cisco Compute Hyperconverged

Read 1 Cisco Compute Hyperconverged review

266 Views
266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware vSAN

Read 234 VMware vSAN reviews

15,097 Views
9,662 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cisco Compute Hyperconverged

VMware vSAN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

VMware vSAN and Cisco Compute Hyperconverged are competing products in the hyperconverged infrastructure space. Cisco Compute Hyperconverged emerges with an upper hand due to its expansive features and superior support infrastructure.

Features: VMware vSAN offers seamless integration with VMware environments, robust storage solutions, and scalability. Cisco Compute Hyperconverged provides integrated networking capabilities, flexibility across different environments, and diverse configuration options. Cisco's broader feature set gives it an edge for those needing extensive network integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware vSAN is noted for straightforward deployment in VMware settings with comprehensive support. Cisco Compute Hyperconverged provides a flexible deployment model with strong customer support, suitable for complex network setups. Cisco's deployment flexibility and strong service surpass VMware vSAN for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: VMware vSAN is recognized for competitive pricing and efficient ROI due to minimal integration overhead. Cisco Compute Hyperconverged has a higher initial setup cost but offers satisfying ROI through extensive features and adaptable deployment, proving worthwhile for many despite the initial expense.

To learn more, read our detailed HCI Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HCI

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Compute Hyperconverged

Ranking in HCI

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware vSAN

Ranking in HCI

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Ashok Dwivedi

Sr. Manager Network Operation & Deployment Working with Airtel India at Airtel

Improved telecom control functions and security have exposed user plane performance gaps

I see that the hardware side and performance concerns are prevalent, even in Cisco hardware used in the card platform. We have observed the same issues with Cisco Compute Hyperconverged platforms as well, indicating a performance issue. Regarding the stability rating, it should be around seven because the support from Cisco is nice, but the performance of the product does not meet our preferences. For additional features to enhance competitiveness, Cisco needs to improve their hardware utilization performance specifically. There is a significant gap between the throughput they recommend and what commercial enterprises experience, which is around a thirty percent gap. If we talk about Red Hat or other external platforms, in that scenario, it is better for enterprises that want a complete support package to go with Cisco. However, if the enterprise has the capability to maintain in-house, it may be better to consider different hyperscalers. Another concern with Cisco is that they are trying to bind customers to specific hardware.

Read full review

ShyamikaThamel

Associate Tech Specialists at Seatrium

Managing mixed RAID workloads has improved data protection and delivers strong performance

VMware vSAN can be improved in certain areas. In cases involving our large data stores with large VMs, we experience some latency, not during normal operation, but during database backup operations. We observed latency due to buffer issues from the top-of-the-rack switches. These issues are mostly network-related because all storage data traffic travels through the network. I have recently used Nutanix, and I observed that Nutanix provides better performance than VMware vSAN due to its data locality features. VMware vSAN is now providing data locality, but we did not use that option. If VMware vSAN provides additional features in the next release, such as the VM balancing feature called DRS on the cluster that VMware previously had, it would be beneficial. With DRS, VMs can move easily from one node to another within the same cluster. Nutanix does not provide that flexibility. When placing a VM on a cluster in Nutanix, the placement uses a balancing component. After that, the VM remains on the same host. If any contention occurs on the CPU or memory side, the VM stays in place until contention happens. If issues occur, the VM migrates to another host while transferring all objects to the same host. This is how their data locality is maintained. When a VM moves to any host, it moves with all VM objects. VMware vSAN does not currently offer this option. If a VM moves to another host, it accesses the disk object through the network, which increases latency. VMware vSAN now offers an option to select data locality, but it does not function like Nutanix. This is why some latency remains. If VMware vSAN can improve this feature, it would be very helpful and VMware would regain its top position.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Regarding Cisco Compute Hyperconverged's data protection capabilities in terms of business continuity and protection, I would rate them as a nine, as there are no concerns concerning protection."

"Now it is stable, and we trust it more."

"It's completely hyper-converged, so it's very convenient; we get everything in a bundle."

"The most important functionality is the ability to extend cluster storage and cluster computing power securely without loss of data."

"The high availability is very good."

"What VSAN allows us to do is give them an enterprise-class array, enterprise-class solution at usually half the cost of the traditional arrays."

"Being hyperconverged, it simplifies what equipment we have to buy."

"I like the tolerance of VMware vSAN."

"In general, VMware customer support is world class."

More VMware vSAN pros

Cons

"Regarding the stability rating, it should be around seven because the support from Cisco is nice, but the performance of the product does not meet our preferences."

"We want see a better monitoring tool in vSAN. Monitoring is not that great as of now because it shows us false alarms in the Health status."

"This solution could be improved by having more than one controller for the environment. VMware depends on one controller for the whole environment, whereas Nutanix has one controller for each node. Because there is only one controller with VMware, if there was any drop, then the whole environment would stop working. In Nutanix, I have five nodes—there is one controller for each node and it depends on a virtual controller—so if the controller of any node is down, the whole environment will still work."

"Room for improvement would be support for more NVMe-based devices and especially firmware combinations; that's sometimes a problem."

"They can package it in a way that is specific to the hardware infrastructure and the hardware platform. It should stay fairly up to date with the drivers and the manufacturer issues. The problem with uncoupling the proprietary technology and component capabilities is that by uncoupling them, you run into some concerns or challenges over the poor performance model. These concerns really come when you start talking about high performance, high bandwidth, and high availability types of environments. While vSAN is a leader, in a critical view, it is not about being cost-effective. It is more about the immediate impact of money loss to the business in critical applications where we want to maintain a continuous operational 59 model. It is, however, good for QA/QC tasks. I don't necessarily know how it works in regards to VDI or virtual desktop infrastructure."

"We would really like them to look at what Nutanix did for day-one/day-two operations deployment: Bringing in the equipment, getting it deployed, getting it setup, and ease of use of one-click for deploying our 30-node solution."

"During some intensive I/O workloads, and on a configuration that had SSDs sub-sized, we reached the limit of the system."

"The implementation of VSAN along with the implementation of all hyper-convergence technology is tricky."

"Its integration with a hybrid cloud can be improved. Its scalability can also be improved so that it can be integrated with more than 32 nodes."

More VMware vSAN cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is a license required for this solution, it is a one-time payment. However, if they want support for the solution, it can be paid annually or for three years."

"The product is quite expensive, regarding the open source solution."

"The vSAN is somewhat expensive to license."

"The cost is expensive. I purchased two servers. The hardware cost was $19,000. The software cost for these two servers, including the vSAN, was $30,000, which is $11,000 more than the hardware. Then I had to pay another $5,000 for installation and implementation for professional services. In total, it was $54,000 for two vSAN Servers."

"The licenses are very expensive. The renewal of licenses has extra costs attached to it."

"I feel the pricing to be reasonable."

"It is expensive. It should be cheaper. It has a perpetual license as well as a subscription-based license, but they are moving towards subscription-based licenses."

"It is an expensive solution. There should be more flexible with licensing to allow small businesses the essentials of the solution's features."

More VMware vSAN pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	100
Midsize Enterprise	58
Large Enterprise	129

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Compute Hyperconverged?

Their pricing is acceptable because they are trying to match the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Compute Hyperconverged?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Compute Hyperconverged?

I have only used Cisco Compute Hyperconverged for telecom equipment, specifically telecom network functions. I cannot comment on other applications, but when using the hyperscaler for telecom, part...

See all answers

What Is The Biggest Difference Between vSAN And VxRail?

While both run on the vSAN technology from VMware, vSAN needs to be deployed on vSAN ready nodes while VxRail is an engineered system. The choice to choose which technology depends on two major fac...

See all answers

How does HPE Simplivity compare with VMware vSAN?

HPE SimpliVity is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution that is primarily geared to mid-sized companies. We researched VMware vSAN but found HPE was a better option for us. HPE SimpliVity has ...

See all answers

How does VMware vSAN compare with Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct?

We found VMware’s vSAN was easy to set up, configure, and manage compared to other solutions we considered. It is best suited for small- to medium-sized organizations. It is easy to create load bal...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Cisco Compute Hyperconverged

Compared 68% of the time

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure vs Cisco Compute Hyperconverged

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Compute Hyperconverged Competitors

VxRail vs VMware vSAN

Compared 16% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs VMware vSAN

Compared 11% of the time

HPE SimpliVity vs VMware vSAN

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs VMware vSAN

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp AFF vs VMware vSAN

Compared 6% of the time

More VMware vSAN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCI

March 2026

Download Cisco Compute Hyperconverged product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware vSAN

March 2026

Download VMware vSAN product report

Also Known As

No data available

vSAN

Overview

Cisco Compute Hyperconverged offers a highly integrated infrastructure solution that seamlessly combines computing, storage, and networking resources into a single platform, making it a preferred choice for businesses seeking streamlined IT operations.

Ideal for organizations looking to optimize their IT ecosystem, Cisco Compute Hyperconverged enhances data center management and provides scalability. It allows businesses to reduce their footprint while increasing flexibility, enabling rapid deployment and simplified management. This approach supports digital transformation by integrating advanced technologies, delivering substantial efficiencies in processing and storage, and supporting a diverse set of workloads across different environments.

What are the key features of Cisco Compute Hyperconverged?

Scalable Architecture: Supports growth with ease, allowing businesses to expand infrastructure as needs increase.
Integrated Management: Centralizes control for efficient management of resources.
High Availability: Ensures continuous operation with minimal downtime.
Data Protection: Offers robust security features to safeguard critical information.
Performance Optimization: Delivers enhanced processing power to meet demanding application needs.

What benefits can users expect from using Cisco Compute Hyperconverged?

Reduced Costs: Minimizes infrastructure expenses through streamlined resource management.
Improved Efficiency: Increases IT productivity by automating routine tasks.
Enhanced Agility: Allows quick adaptation to changing business requirements.
Lowered Risk: Provides reliable data protection reducing operational risks.
Future-Proofing: Keeps businesses ready for technological advancements.

In industries such as healthcare and finance, Cisco Compute Hyperconverged is implemented to handle critical workloads efficiently, maintain stringent data security standards, and meet the high-performance demands of data-intensive applications. Its ability to deliver reliable, scalable, and secure solutions makes it ideal for organizations committed to innovation and growth.

Cisco

VMware vSAN is a software-defined storage product that is used in collaboration with VMware ESXi hypervisor and that provisions and manages storage based on policies, regardless of the underlying hardware. The solution enables you to prime your business for growth through its seamless evolution (it is integrated with vSphere and requires no new tools), its flexibility, and its multi-cloud capabilities. As an industry-leading software, VMware vSAN provides high levels of performance with minimal impact on CPU and memory.

VMware vSAN Features

VMware vSAN has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Storage policy-based management (SPBM): VMware vSAN supports storage policy-based management for automated management of storage profiles.

Software-defined data-at-rest encryption: With this VMware vSAN feature, you can prevent unauthorized access of data at rest.

Multiple nodes: VMware vSAN provides clusters that can include as few as 2 nodes or as many as 64 nodes.

High security and availability: VMware vSAN offers stretched clusters, allowing more than one virtualization host server to be used in the same setup, promoting higher security as well as availability.

Deduplication: VMware vSAN’s deduplication compresses data to ensure efficient storage management and security.

HCI mesh updates: VMware vSAN clusters can share storage capacity with non-HCI Sphere clusters and can adopt HCI without having to scale computing resources and storage or replace existing servers.

Simplified file services: With VMware vSAN’s file services, backup of file shares is simplified. You can use APIs that allow backup and recovery software vendors to integrate with your VMware vSAN file services, which enables backup software to track new data and add scalability enhancements to files.

VMware vSAN Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing VMware vSAN. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Reduced total cost of ownership (TCO): VMware vSAN helps you reduce upfront costs for businesses because it can be easily deployed on inexpensive x86 servers. In addition, its highly scalable infrastructure and quick deployment also save organizations time and money, making it an efficient storage solution.

Good manageability: VMWare vSAN is easy to set up, manage, and provision, without sacrificing performance.

Scalability: VMware vSAN is agile and allows administrators to scale storage on demand, quickly, and efficiently via policies and rules.

Simplicity: VMWare vSAN is simple to configure since it is embedded in the vSphere hypervisor. Installing it using the vSphere Web Client can be done quickly.

Reduced risk: VMWare vSAN reduces the risk associated with digital transformations by utilizing existing tools, skill sets, and solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the VMware vSAN solution.

PeerSpot user Yves S., CEO, Cloud Evangelist at Comdivision Consulting GmbH, says, “vSAN gives us a lot of advantages when we need to expand resources. We have an overall larger host infrastructure, and we split that up for specific customer test and use cases. In that specific scenario, we can easily add more hosts or reduce the number of hosts in the environment.”

A reviewer who works in Infrastructure Security explains, “The ease of use is great. The initial setup and upgrade process was pretty straightforward. And, technical support is great.”

Laurent N., Director at Softlogic, comments, "The feature that I have found most valuable is that it is easy to deploy. It is easy to create and delete virtual servers. It is easy to create the load balancing and the clustering."

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Read Some Case Studies At Home Cloud CaribCINgroupDiscovery Check out the Rest of our Customer Stories Here

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Broadcom, Nutanix and others in HCI. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best HCI vendors.

We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.