Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) comparison

Cisco and F5 are both solutions in the SSL VPN category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while F5 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 8.2% mindshare in SV, compared to F5’s 14.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of F5 users who would recommend it.
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Read 47 Cisco IOS SSL VPN reviews
  • 689 Views
  • 420 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...
Read 14 F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) reviews
  • 737 Views
  • 623 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Cisco IOS SSL VPN and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) are major competitors in the secure remote access market. Cisco IOS SSL VPN holds an advantage in ease of use and scalability, whereas F5 BIG-IP APM is often preferred for its comprehensive features and advanced customization capabilities.

Features: Cisco IOS SSL VPN is recognized for its simple user-based authentication, robust encryption, and high scalability, making it reliable and straightforward for quick configuration creation. F5 BIG-IP APM shines with advanced network integration abilities, offering customizable user portals and solid performance, favorable in large enterprise settings for managing complex networking challenges.

Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS SSL VPN could improve its pricing, support for multi-layered networks, and integration with newer technologies, as its graphical interface is seen as outdated. F5 BIG-IP APM faces criticism for its complex initial setup, with users seeking better reporting and operational deployment, along with enhancements in pricing, automation, and integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS SSL VPN is stable and easy to deploy, especially in hybrid and on-premises environments, with strong local and partner support. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager provides versatile deployment choices and good customer support, though its cloud capabilities require further advancement. Both receive favorable technical support feedback, with Cisco noted for consistent and globally responsive service.

Pricing and ROI: Both Cisco IOS SSL VPN and F5 BIG-IP APM are considered expensive. Cisco’s various licensing options align with its comprehensive security features, yet users demand more flexible pricing. F5 BIG-IP APM is straightforward in licensing but perceived as costly. Users report strong ROI for each, with Cisco's bundled security features particularly validating its higher cost.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Ranking in SSL VPN
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (9th)
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...
Ranking in SSL VPN
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (19th), Network Access Control (NAC) (8th), Remote Access (13th), Access Management (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the SSL VPN category, the mindshare of Cisco IOS SSL VPN is 8.2%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is 14.6%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SSL VPN
 

Featured Reviews

Rupesh Kolhapurkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers easy setup phase but needs to improve connectivity
For our company's remote workforce connectivity, the tool was very useful during the COVID-19 situation. In general, the VPN functionality offered by the product was very useful during the COVID-19 situation. In terms of the product's ability to secure third-party access, the tool works very well. The most valuable feature of the product in terms of network security stems from the fact that the tool provides access to the whole network, and even if users give access to some special applications, it is still really helpful. The clientless access feature is not available for clients. My company installed the product for its clients. If the product offers a clientless access feature, then it is okay and can be very helpful for our company. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is a reliable product. The product is very helpful for a work-from-home setup as the tool can be used to access our company's internal network, which Falls outside the network of our organization. I rate the tool a seven to eight out of ten.
Read full review
Ashish Kumar Rai - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers remote access control, good GUI and easy to configure
I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal. In the APM interface itself, they could add direct hyperlinks to relevant online documentation. This would provide easy access to admin guides and other resources when working within the GUI.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It helps us access networks from anywhere."
"The multicast feature is useful for us."
"The setup and installation was easy."
"The solution is very reliable."
"I have found that Cisco IOS SSL VPN is stable."
"The solution is very stable."
"The solution's environment is stable and doesn't get disconnected every now and then."
"The solution's technical support is very good."
More Cisco IOS SSL VPN pros
"The tool is reliable and easy to configure."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Our customers have never complained about the stability"
"In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work."
"The portal access was very good."
"F5 BIG-IP APM is relatively easy to use."
"We have seen a return on investment from F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. It provided access at a time when we didn't have it."
"Our organization is small - a college with about 3,500 students. We use F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager to protect our site, especially from the Iranian attacks we faced last year. We restrict access to only inside the country."
More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) pros
 

Cons

"It can be difficult to find service and at times we cannot connect with the internet easily."
"I have no notes in terms of areas of improvement."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN doesn't support the configuration of multiple VPNs."
"The solution's configuration could be made easier."
"The only issue with Cisco IOS SSL VPN is on the price point. Price is an area of the solution where improvements are required."
"It would be helpful if Cisco IOS SSL VPN could help us set up devices on our iPads and phones."
"In addition to Cisco, we work with other solutions on behalf of our customers, such as Fortinet for FortiGate, but this latter solution can achieve the same results at a lower price."
"I would like for it to have support for the Dutch language. I typically use English in 99% of our communications but for some people, it matters."
More Cisco IOS SSL VPN cons
"The technical support’s response time must be improved."
"The price of this product can be improved."
"The solution’s GUI looks very old."
"I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal."
"Regarding price, I'm not directly involved in purchasing, but our CIO thinks the product is very expensive. He's considering moving from the tool to Citrix NetScaler WAF because it's cheaper, and we already have Citrix for VDI. We got NetScaler almost free as part of our VDI deal. Three years ago, I convinced him to use the solution because it's better, but now, with budget constraints, he may want to switch."
"F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has room for improvement in integration with other products."
"We do not have knowledgeable support teams locally."
"The solution is quite costly."
More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost of the solution is on a yearly basis, and it is expensive compared to other solutions in the market."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN comes with a cost-effective subscription."
"With Cisco, there is a free solution or a licensed version of the solution with a set of endpoint services."
"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Cisco IOS SSL VPN."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is more expensive than the Aruba VPN, but it is worth the money."
"The solution is reasonably priced, and we have around 50% to 60% discounts from Cisco."
"The product costs less."
"I would say it is a bit expensive, but I think it is worth the price."
More Cisco IOS SSL VPN pricing and cost advice
"The tool is a little bit expensive."
"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The product is very expensive."
"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL VPN solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Educational Organization
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
The solution is pretty fast.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
It is an expensive product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
Sometimes, the product does not connect with the Wi-Fi. It usually does, but sometimes, if I'm using another Wi-Fi apart from my work Wi-Fi, it does not connect. It shows some error. If I have to w...
See all answers
What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?
In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?
I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?
Regarding price, I'm not directly involved in purchasing, but our CIO thinks the product is very expensive. He's considering moving from the tool to Citrix NetScaler WAF because it's cheaper, and w...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN Logo
Ivanti Connect Secure vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Compared 34% of the time
Citrix Gateway vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN Logo
Citrix Gateway vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Compared 13% of the time
Fortinet FortiClient vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN Logo
Fortinet FortiClient vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Compared 11% of the time
Zyxel VPN Client vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN Logo
Zyxel VPN Client vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Compared 10% of the time
OpenVPN Access Server vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN Logo
OpenVPN Access Server vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Compared 10% of the time
More Cisco IOS SSL VPN Competitors
Citrix Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Citrix Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Compared 12% of the time
Ivanti Connect Secure vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Ivanti Connect Secure vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Compared 10% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Compared 9% of the time
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Compared 6% of the time
BeyondTrust Remote Support vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
BeyondTrust Remote Support vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Compared 4% of the time
More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
January 2025
Cisco IOS SSL VPN reportDownload Cisco IOS SSL VPN product report
Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
January 2025
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) reportDownload F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) product report
 

Also Known As

Cisco SSL VPN
F5 Access Policy Manager
 

Learn More

Cisco
F5
 

Overview

Cisco SSL VPN solutions help you easily and securely extend the network to users who have access to the Internet and a web browser. You can customize access and extend the reach of your corporate network to individuals based on their roles, including teleworker contractors and business partners.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is an access management proxy solution for managing global access to the enterprise networks, cloud providers, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Through a single management interface, BIG-IP APM consolidates remote, mobile, network, virtual, and web access. 

BIG-IP APM can also serve as a bridge between modern and classic authentication and authorization protocols and methods. For applications which are unable to support modern authentication and authorization protocols, like SAML and OAuth with OIDC, but which do support classic authentication methods, BIG-IP APM converts user credentials to the appropriate authentication standard supported by the application.

BIG-IP APM Benefits:

  • Ease of use
  • Flexibility
  • Ability to integrate with other systems
  • Security features
  • Granular access control
  • Responsive and helpful support team

BIG-IP APM Features:

  • Support for Identity Aware Proxy (IAP) enabling Zero Trust application access
  • Context-based authorization with dynamic L4/L7 ACLs
  • Integration with third-party MFA solutions
  • DTLS 2.0 mode for delivering and securing applications
  • SAML 2.0 identity federation support
  • Support for OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol
  • SSO support for classic authentication (Kerberos, header- based, etc.), credential caching, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, and FIDO2 (U2F)
  • AAA server authentication and high-availability
  • Integration with leading IAM vendor products (Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity)
  • BIG IP Edge Client and F5 Access integrate with VMware Horizon ONE (AirWatch), Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360
  • Risk-based access leveraging third-party UEBA and risk engines (HTTP Connector)

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by BIG-IP APM users.

Mahmmoud Rabie, Senior Site Reliability Engineer, writes that BIG-IP APM is "A highly stable solution for load balancing, but the initial setup is complex."

Clyde Livingston, Senior Process Specialist at Telstra, says that BIG-IP APM is "Easy to use, useful access remotely, but lacking stability."

Chris Lam, Senior Solution Consultant at Macroview Telecom Limited, states that BIG-IP APM is "Useful for remote access VPN and VPI integration with VMware.

 

Sample Customers

MST Systems
City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office
Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
January 2025
Free Report: Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors.

We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.