Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Citrix Gateway
Ranking in SSL VPN
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Universal Access Gateways (1st), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (11th)
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...
Ranking in SSL VPN
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (20th), Network Access Control (NAC) (7th), Remote Access (13th), Access Management (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the SSL VPN category, the mindshare of Citrix Gateway is 17.6%, down from 22.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is 15.6%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SSL VPN
 

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Citrix Gateway facititates remote access infrastructure to provide single sign-on across all applications in a data center, cloud. Easy-to-use product with data security features
The product is easy to use. I enter my user ID and password and start working There could be a faster connection, increased user-friendliness, and users connection/sign-in history. Although it is easy to use, it could benefit from being more intuitive. I would appreciate a more user-friendly…
Ashish Kumar Rai - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers remote access control, good GUI and easy to configure
I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal. In the APM interface itself, they could add direct hyperlinks to relevant online documentation. This would provide easy access to admin guides and other resources when working within the GUI.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Providing our organization the ability to work remotely was the most valuable feature of Citrix Gateway. I also enjoy that they are always adding features."
"For our use case, it was scalable. There were at least 25 end users using this solution from remote locations. And once the connection was established, there weren't any complaints."
"What I find most valuable about this solution, is that it runs seamlessly."
"It performs quite well."
"Provides good performance and speed."
"If you need to share resources across a corporation, I would recommend this solution."
"Citrix Gateway improved the security of the access of our applications outside the network."
"The solution is stable."
"We have seen a return on investment from F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. It provided access at a time when we didn't have it."
"In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work."
"Our organization is small - a college with about 3,500 students. We use F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager to protect our site, especially from the Iranian attacks we faced last year. We restrict access to only inside the country."
"Our customers have never complained about the stability"
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The tool is reliable and easy to configure."
"The portal access was very good."
"The most valuable feature is the virtual IP creation. It's our most frequently used feature."
 

Cons

"When it comes to the VDA environment, making it additionally stable is important."
"Technical support could be improved."
"It's extremely complicated and it's not intuitive. The solution requires a lot of training to get going on it."
"The tool must provide better integration and connectivity."
"Sometimes the input-output has issues."
"Their VAS product should be more productive because right now, we are using other VAS solutions but not using this one."
"As an organization, our initiative is to move to the cloud, Citrix Gateway needs to improve its cloud capabilities and make the cloud solution more robust."
"Lacks access through a mobile device."
"F5 BIG-IP APM disconnects when you leave it for long enough, but that is natural for IT solutions to do. That's a little bit frustrating."
"In my opinion, the GUI side needs some improvement based on my usage. Sometimes, it doesn't work as efficiently as the CLI side."
"Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control."
"F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has room for improvement in integration with other products."
"I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal."
"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better"
"We do not have knowledgeable support teams locally."
"The technical support’s response time must be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It costs about 4,000 a year."
"I believe the pricing is comparable to SaaS"
"Pricing is very high if you do a comparison with what is available in the market."
"It is expensive and requires proper planning with strategy."
"Citrix is quite expensive."
"There is a need to make yearly payments for licensing purposes. Also, it is not an expensive one."
"The price could be lower."
"The solution has a yearly licensing fee."
"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The tool is a little bit expensive."
"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"
"The product is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL VPN solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
48%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
5%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Gateway?
We can maintain our systems using the solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Gateway?
In the past, the pricing was a good point, but at this moment, the pricing is a bit high because the price has increased a lot. In many cases, companies don't want to renew their Citrix Gateway sol...
What needs improvement with Citrix Gateway?
The pricing could be better. In many cases, our customers are thinking of migrating to other products in the market, like F5 BIG-IP. In many cases, companies are looking to migrate their entire sol...
What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?
In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work.
What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?
Regarding price, I'm not directly involved in purchasing, but our CIO thinks the product is very expensive. He's considering moving from the tool to Citrix NetScaler WAF because it's cheaper, and w...
 

Also Known As

Citrix NetScaler Unified Gateway
F5 Access Policy Manager
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aeronamic, Avianca, Bechtel Corporation, Betfair UK, Catholic University Leuven (K.U. Leuven), Centene Corporation, Cerner, Charityshare, City of High Point, Clark Builders
City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix Gateway vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.