Citrix Gateway vs Ivanti Connect Secure comparison

Citrix and Ivanti are both solutions in the SSL VPN category. Citrix is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Ivanti is ranked #3 with an average rating of 6.7. Citrix holds a 13.1% mindshare in SV, compared to Ivanti’s 21.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Citrix Gateway

Read 38 Citrix Gateway reviews

1,907 Views
687 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Ivanti Connect Secure

Read 28 Ivanti Connect Secure reviews

3,584 Views
1,039 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Citrix Gateway

Ivanti Connect Secure

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Citrix Gateway and Ivanti Connect Secure compete in the network security space. Citrix Gateway takes the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and strong security capabilities, while Ivanti Connect Secure excels in ease of use and reliability.

Features: Citrix Gateway is noted for its security capabilities, including VPN and Web Application Firewall, multi-format support, and scalability with Azure and AWS. Ivanti Connect Secure is valued for its ease of use, VPN tunneling, and multi-factor authentication, making it secure and customer-friendly.

Room for Improvement: Citrix Gateway needs to enhance user-friendliness, streamline its dashboard, and improve training resources and support. Ivanti Connect Secure should focus on faster connection speeds, better third-party integration, and pricing improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix Gateway supports both on-premises and cloud deployments with mixed reviews on technical support. Ivanti Connect Secure offers hybrid deployment but also receives mixed feedback regarding support responsiveness and helpfulness.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix Gateway is perceived as expensive, but users find value in its security and features, requiring careful licensing evaluation. Ivanti Connect Secure is similarly high-priced, particularly in licensing costs, yet both solutions are seen as valuable network security investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix Gateway vs. Ivanti Connect Secure Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Citrix Gateway vs. Ivanti Connect Secure

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Citrix Gateway

Ranking in SSL VPN

2nd

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Universal Access Gateways (1st)

Ivanti Connect Secure

Ranking in SSL VPN

3rd

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the SSL VPN category, the mindshare of Citrix Gateway is 13.1%, down from 17.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Connect Secure is 21.5%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

SSL VPN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Citrix Gateway	13.1%
Ivanti Connect Secure	21.5%
Other	65.4%

SSL VPN

Featured Reviews

VivekKumar10

Co-Founder at Virajo

Enables secure remote access and load balancing with enhanced protection features

I find Citrix Gateway valuable for its capabilities as a reverse proxy, providing security to applications exposed to the Internet. Key features include load balancing, dual-factor authentication, clientless VPN, and Web Application Firewall (WAF). The product effectively helps me protect the organization's network from potential threats, thereby securing our environment from hackers and ransomware attacks.

Read full review

Johan Derycke

Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reliable remote access and tunneling enhance work efficiency, but upgrade processes need improvement

Ivanti needs improvement in its seamless upgrade and migration procedures, particularly with the browser components, which are fragile and sometimes cause issues depending on the Windows version, the browser version, and the different modules being used. On the client side, browser-initiated sessions are complex and require a more robust approach for non-admin users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product enables us to collect logs from the systems."

"The solution is scalable and can go from a very small deployment to handling 10,000 transactions a second."

"We can maintain our systems using the solution."

"Citrix Gateway is stable once I am connected."

"The most valuable feature is that it is secure."

"The initial setup is simple. Normally with all setups, it's not very complicated. It really depends on the customer."

"It's a stable solution while it's running. We don't have to work on it a lot. There are not many bugs, so it's easy to use if you deploy successfully. You can be sure of an uninterrupted solution for quite a long time. Citrix is a good product."

"I didn't have any hiccups or issues with it."

More Citrix Gateway pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of Pulse Connect Secure is its ease of use."

"The new UI that they are providing right now is very good."

"The most valuable features of Pulse Connect Secure are multi-factor authentications, and VPNs and SSL VPNs we are using."

"The product is easy to use."

"I like the host checker, which thoroughly checks the security posture of the machine before allowing access. I also like application-based access and its seamless operations."

"VPN tunneling is a very valuable feature of Pulse Connect Secure. I also like that it is straightforward to use, and you can see traffic logs on it."

"The solution helps with principal decisions. It also helps with the security and configuration of many technologies."

More Ivanti Connect Secure pros

Cons

"The initial setup is not straightforward."

"Citrix Gateway could improve the speed of the VPN. I sometimes have to wait for 10 to 15 minutes to get connected and other times when I am connected I have to abort, and reconnect."

"As Citrix Gateway is a third party solution, we wish to have one which is more integrated and involves less administration."

"The tool must provide better integration and connectivity."

"If there is an increase in the customer infrastructure, it is not stable."

"Their VAS product should be more productive because right now, we are using other VAS solutions but not using this one."

"As an organization, our initiative is to move to the cloud, Citrix Gateway needs to improve its cloud capabilities and make the cloud solution more robust."

"Technical support could be improved."

More Citrix Gateway cons

"Pulse Connect Secure could improve by having better integration with NAC solutions, such as Cisco ClearPass integration with Pulse Connect Secure. Additionally, they need better integration with Microsoft Azure AD and Azure Authenticator."

"This solution normally works but at times, we have had trouble with connectivity."

"I would like the solution to be more secure and compatible. It also needs to improve integration with other systems."

"Setup is complex. A few users had some issues with it."

"We need to know how many live active users there are and we can't. We even updated the server, however, we still can't see the proper level of live connections. Right now, it's showing as 300 users and my customer does not have that many users in his organization."

"Connection-wise, Pulse Connect Secure could be faster, and this is its area for improvement."

"User experience and after-sales support could be better. For example, over the last couple of years, when this COVID scenario was going on, there were multiple attacks on these types of solutions. SQL has been attacked numerous times, and there were a lot of vulnerabilities, and our customers had to update and upgrade the devices every two weeks or every month. This was a headache. It could also be more scalable."

"The stability could be better. There are sometimes bugs in the system."

More Ivanti Connect Secure cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a need to make yearly payments for licensing purposes. Also, it is not an expensive one."

"It is expensive and requires proper planning with strategy."

"The solution has a yearly licensing fee."

"Usually with Citrix the issue is the pricing, especially for the African region. We believe it's really expensive."

"I consider Citrix Gateway to be an expensive solution, generally ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 yearly, depending on the model."

"I believe the pricing is comparable to SaaS"

"There is a license to use Citrix Gateway and it is less expensive to use when compared to other solutions."

"Citrix is quite expensive."

More Citrix Gateway pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product price a six to seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"A license is required for you to use Pulse Connect Secure, but I'm not aware of how much it costs."

"Pulse Connect Secure is relatively cost-effective."

"The pricing is quite nominal. We pay on a yearly basis."

"The cost of the product is high, but worth it because of the utility and great product support."

"The pricing for Pulse Connect Secure is not low and not high, so it's good. It's a six out of ten for me, price-wise."

"The price of Pulse Connect Secure is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Gateway?

We can maintain our systems using the solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Gateway?

I consider Citrix Gateway to be an expensive solution, generally ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 yearly, depending on the model. It is seen as a premium product compared to competitors like F5, and ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Citrix Gateway?

In the past, I submitted some support tickets, and while the support did resolve the problems, the time taken was sometimes long. They can perhaps improve the time for solutions in the support tick...

See all answers

What do you like most about Pulse Connect Secure?

From an end-user perspective, the setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pulse Connect Secure?

Ivanti has always been known to be pricey, making it a rather high-cost solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pulse Connect Secure?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenVPN Access Server vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 17% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 17% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Citrix Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

More Citrix Gateway Competitors

Ivanti Secure Access vs Ivanti Connect Secure

Compared 20% of the time

OpenVPN Access Server vs Ivanti Connect Secure

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Ivanti Connect Secure

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Ivanti Connect Secure

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs Ivanti Connect Secure

Compared 4% of the time

More Ivanti Connect Secure Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Citrix Gateway

October 2025

Download Citrix Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Connect Secure

October 2025

Download Ivanti Connect Secure product report

Also Known As

Citrix NetScaler Unified Gateway

Pulse Connect Secure

Overview

Citrix Gateway is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. Citrix Gateway provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.

Citrix

Ivanti Connect Secure provides a seamless, cost-effective SSL VPN solution for remote and mobile users from any web-enabled device to corporate resources— anytime, anywhere.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Aeronamic, Avianca, Bechtel Corporation, Betfair UK, Catholic University Leuven (K.U. Leuven), Centene Corporation, Cerner, Charityshare, City of High Point, Clark Builders

Axcient, Baloise Group, Cygate, Catholic University of America, Datec Inc, Revlon, Santa Monica Networks, 7-Eleven

Buyer's Guide

Citrix Gateway vs. Ivanti Connect Secure

September 2025

Free Report: Citrix Gateway vs. Ivanti Connect Secure

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix Gateway vs. Ivanti Connect Secure and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Citrix Gateway vs. Ivanti Connect Secure report.

See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.